Then he needs to get players who do.
At the end of the day the GM, Coach and Players are all accountable
What players would you ‘get who do’?
People too often act as though this stuff exists in a vacuum, that a GM can just go and pluck whatever talent exists. But they obviously cannot do that.
What people often ignore, is that players are not just their stat sheets. No GM exists in the head of their players. If Dubas could trade the entire team for the Lightning’s roster, let’s say. Do you do it? They have proven they are able to win.
Let’s say Dubas does that. He trades the entire maple leaf roster for the lightnings roster. Is that a good idea? Did Dubas do a good job? Since nothing has to do with the players and the idea is just to get guys who win, that sounds like the right thing to do.
Now what if that team doesn’t win the cup this year? Is that Dubas’ fault? He did exactly what you’re saying should end in the best result.
But what if in this hypothetical Florida won. Does that mean it’s the Florida GM who won the cup? Because he didn’t trade his roster for the Tampa roster? Is he the only GM who is good?
Or even worse, what if Tampa won with the Leafs old roster?
At some point the players need to actually do the thing. And no one is omniscient, no one can predict what’s going to happen. It doesn’t mean they’ve done a bad job. It doesn’t even mean it’s their fault.
If the Leafs win the whole damn thing this year, does that mean Dubas was only a good GM this year? And he was a bad gm all the other years?
What if Marner wins the conn Smyth? He’s good enough to do that. Does that make Dubas a clown for not trading him last year when he sucked? Or does it make him a genius for not trading him?
It’s like Dubas is both a moron and a genius at the same time, and until the players execute or don’t execute we don’t know which one he is.
It’s a really silly way to look at the team.