We're all in agreement that he's a generational winger right ?
I don't think Malkin 09 was very far off Mcdavid 24. 36 points in 24 games vs 42 points in 25 games in a lower scoring year.Peak Malkin was every bit as good as peak Crosby, based on the half season he was capable of immediately following 2010-11; 33-32-65 in 41 vs. 32-34-66 in 41. Playoffs are more or less the same story both had 28 points in 17 games after 3 rounds, then Crosby had Lidstrom and Zetterberg stapled to him in the finals allowing Malkin to run wild and dominate. I think if anything Crosby would’ve strung together a few more of these super dominant seasons in his age 23-25 frame than Malkin would’ve, and possibly didn’t even get to reach his true potential even on a per game basis, we’ll never really know for sure.
To Kucherov’s credit he seems primed to have two of these seasons in a row right now which actually not even McDavid has done. One last thing though, none of these players have reached the playoff peak of McDavid in 2022 or 2024, that’s firmly the best player I’ve seen since Lemieux.
Kucherov is incredible and has the best vision/iq in the league. Think he ages better than any of the guys mentioned in this thread due simply to that. At his performance level it's inevitable he gets compared to other greats.You literally just said to enjoy Kucherov. The unique issue is to him, not TB. Tell me this without entire Crosby, MacKinnon and McDavid stat lines dominating full pages here
Crosby missed a lot of games, not the same.I mean you're the one that said he was peak Crosby over a full season. Peak Crosby lapped the field, no one was even close. A 99 game sample size is pretty telling that no one was in his league. If you want to go to prime instead, 07-14, it's Crosby again.
Crosby 1.42
Malkin 1.22
Ovechkin 1.18
St Louis 1.07
Thornton 1.05
And adjusted stats are only adjusted based on league averages. They are absolutely not a good way to compare the two eras for scorers. The increase in scoring disproportionately helps scorers, not your average 3rd liner. Smaller goalie pads, more empty net points, high pp efficiencies, no more headshots or cheapshots, no more net front battles, etc. 144 points when there's 9 100+ scorers is not more impressive than 109 (Malkin) or 104 (Crosby) when they are the only ones to hit 100 points in the league.
Kucherov actually seems like he's getting better with age, which is pretty unheard of. He doesn't really rely on physical talents so it'll be interesting to see how long he can dominate. Wouldn't totally surprise me if MacKinnon and McDavid start declining before him despite being years younger. They lean a lot on their skating ability.Interesting analysis: If you look at their 82 gp paces for the years that they both played since 2017 (ie. not including McDavids 2021 - which isn't fair to him, since one of his best seasons, but Kuch also just didn't play so hard to compare).
Overall points and goals on 82gp paces are actually pretty close.
Take from that what you will.
McDavid p/gp Kuch p/gp McDavid g/gp Kuch g/gp 20171.22 1.15 0.37 0.54 20181.32 1.25 0.50 0.49 20191.49 1.56 0.53 0.50 20201.52 1.25 0.53 0.49 20211.88 - 0.59 - 20221.54 1.47 0.55 0.53 20231.87 1.38 0.78 0.37 20241.74 1.78 0.42 0.54 20251.54 1.76 0.54 0.56
McDavid Points Kucherov Points McDavid goals Kucherov goals 2017100 94 30 44 2018108 103 41 40 2019122 128 43 41 2020124 103 44 40 2021 2022126 120 45 44 2023153 113 64 30 2024142 146 35 45 2025126 144 44 46 TOTAL 1,002 951 345 329
I'm not the one that brought up Crosby.Crosby missed a lot of games, not the same.
Save that for the Crosby thread, I don’t even see Kuch mentioned.
Crosbys line faced top lines in 09 though, yes?don't think Malkin 09 was very far off Mcdavid 24. 36 points in 24 games vs 42 points in 25 games in a lower scoring year.
You talking about the leagues 7th leading scorer as well? I guess you’re right. 7th in scoring is pretty good. At the prime age of 27
Yea true, probably mattered the most against Detroit, where Lidstrom-Rafalski + Zetterberg blanketed Crosby all series letting Malkin take advantage of Stuart-Kronwall + Datsyuk.Crosbys line faced top lines in 09 though, yes?
Yea true, probably mattered the most against Detroit, where Lidstrom-Rafalski + Zetterberg blanketed Crosby all series letting Malkin take advantage of Stuart-Kronwall + Datsyuk.
Looked it upThere should be an award for most secondary assists in a season
lol wut. Youre predicting a 60g 100a 160p season? That has been done 5 times ever (4 Wayne, 1 Mario)Im saying it right now, but Kuch will shatter his previous career total and is a lock for 160pts and another 100 assist this season. I could seriously see him go for a higher total for assists, somewhere in the 125-140 range.
People were tripping out thinking a PP merchant like Stamkos was going to cause a huge reduction in his production lmao
Maybe I am, but this mfer is the reincarnation of Gretzky as a winger, his entire offensive arsenal is perfected to a tee. Elite passer/playmaker who rarely makes mistakes when an opportunity is given, disgusting shot, a very cerebral game with an insane IQ. He's just a point production monster who can easily pace for a 120-130pt season. Point being his 1C definitely makes it easier but you put Cirelli or Paul and he's still putting up the same numbers regardless. Kuch is a top 3 winger when it's all said and donelol wut. Youre predicting a 60g 100a 160p season? That has been done 5 times ever (4 Wayne, 1 Mario)
Then 125-140 assists?! 125+ has been done 3 times, all Wayne.
I get it, you think he's great, but youre tossing out some wild numbers.
Im saying it right now, but Kuch will shatter his previous career total and is a lock for 160pts and another 100 assist this season. I could seriously see him go for a higher total for assists, somewhere in the 125-140 range.
People were tripping out thinking a PP merchant like Stamkos was going to cause a huge reduction in his production lmao
He's 100% better than Ovi all time and is the GOAT Russian player easily IMO. 9 Rockets be damned.
Those numbers are a bit out there lol but I do think if he wins another art ross he takes the title of best player in the world from Mcdavid and the title for all time best Russian from Ovechkin.Im saying it right now, but Kuch will shatter his previous career total and is a lock for 160pts and another 100 assist this season. I could seriously see him go for a higher total for assists, somewhere in the 125-140 range.
People were tripping out thinking a PP merchant like Stamkos was going to cause a huge reduction in his production lmao
He's 100% better than Ovi all time and is the GOAT Russian player easily IMO. 9 Rockets be damned.
Mario is the goat. He'd have 200 points in today's league.McDavid is not like Lemieux. Lemieux would never be outscored by MacKinnon, Draisaitl, or Kucherov.
We're all in agreement that he's a generational winger right ?
Yet somehow my thread got closed for saying thisGretzky and Lemieux have only lost the Art Ross to each other. McDavid has lost to Kucherov twice now and will probably lose again. He's a better player but he's not a tier above
All forwards have down years, just look at Crosby in 2015. But hey, Losing an Art Ross at a prime age of 27 to a generational offensive talent in Jamie Ben is pretty good!.You talking about the leagues 7th leading scorer as well? I guess your right. 7th in scoring is pretty good. At the prime age of 27
Gretzky is the only player to hit at least 115 assists, which he of course did seven times. Calling for 125-140 assists when the greatest hockey mind the game has ever seen cleared 125 “just” twice and 135 once is way out of line.
I like the prediction for back to back 100 assists seasons and breaking his still newly minted career high though. It means more fun for the league.
I’ll be cheering and enjoying every moment of however this race unfolds. Kucherov is building a hell of a legacy for himself.
As a huge Kucherov fan, I actually think this is pretty accurate. Kucherov is on the Jagr tier. Still behind Jagr, but catching up -- especially if he outproduced McDavid another time or two. But McDavid remains, IMO, the league's only generational talent, and somewhere inside the top 10 all time already. Nobody's on his tier right now.gretzky is probably 3 tiers above Kucherov, McDavid 1 or 2.
Again - how many players have outscored Kucherov in a season? Too many to count.
Let's level the playing field since Kucherov came in at age 20. How many guys have out produced McDavid in a season since he was 20 ....3? Pretty sure it's:
Kucherov
Mackinnon
Draisaitl.
That's it, that's the entire list.
Now give me 5 mins while I go list all the players who have produced better than Kucherov in a season in his career. It's long, man.
He's a great talent , Jagr esque talent. But he's not on McDavids level
things are only how they are, you have your opinion but he didn't
He got crushed and the players took mackinnon too. It is what it is