bov
Registered User
- Nov 13, 2010
- 7,424
- 4,852
Kreider may be on the back 9 but I still like this for Anaheim, they are trending in the right direction.
I think the pick is going to be a conditional 3rd that becomes a 2nd if the Ducks make the playoffs or something like that. Terrance is a better prospect than people here are giving him credit for. He's probably a Sykora/Berard level prospect with legitimate NHL upside but likely never anything more than a middle 6 C.
You are either paying via money or term in free agency.
That's the thing with NTC. Is that provided only when the team contacts the agent to request it from the player? Or was that something that is due to the team at a set time every year (ie. by late June for the next NHL business year which begins July 1).oooooooo boy
Didn't Kreider have like 3 injuries last season and still potted 20+ goals on a disaster of a team? Feels like a great deal for the Ducks.
What I'm curious about is if something is now going to happen with Gudas/Killorn. I'm not sure why PV would add Kreider's salary without moving some money out. Maybe he feels like the Ducks arent in on as many free agents as possible and just wants to empty the chamber for Marner and only Marner
Why are the ducks giving up a second round pick plus Terrance am I missing something here lol. Hopefully Kreider can still play or this is terrible by Anaheim
ok still doesn't address him playing with multiple injuries on a dysfunctional team.20 goals for a guy who plays as much as Kreider does, especially on the PP, is not anything to write home about. He averages over 3 minutes/game on the PP.
ok still doesn't address him playing with multiple injuries on a dysfunctional team.
That will be at the deadline when NYR needs to add a big fishWhile you're at it, trade for Zibanejad Anaheim
interesting...initial reports are that Kreider is excited to play for Q. He also has a couple buddies on the Ducks. Maybe a fresh start rejuvenates him.(he was one of the main reasons for the dysfunction)
Ding ding dingdrury is taking the much bigger gamble here. verbeek is risking and paying virtually nothing to acquire a player who, at a minimum, adds to the locker room as a leader and has a reasonable chance to provide significant production. drury only wins if he's right on how he replaces kreider and how he allocates that cap space.
Killorn was one of the better and most consistent forwards for Anaheim last season. He doesn’t deserve at all the hate he gets.Unlike Killorn, you should be able to trade Kreider with 1.5 or 1 or 0.5 years left on his deal for a pick and/or prospect. You could get even better quality assets if you retain. It's basically weaponizing the cap space you have that other teams don't in order to get a trade chip and then cashing it in a little down the road for picks and prospects.
If Kreider turns out to be hot garbage in Anaheim, then yeah, maybe it's a 2nd Killorn, but at least this one will be good in the locker room and can teach your kids something, and at least it didn't cost you an arm and a leg to acquire him.
And they say Robertson is a grade a ahole too. I wanted no piece of that pos for the ducksI'm guessing the Ducks weren't a fan of the price on Peterka and Robertson.
I'd prefer Peterka over Robertson, Robertson skates like he has wooden peg legs.
Who says he’s an asshole?And they say Robertson is a grade a ahole too. I wanted no piece of that pos for the ducks
For teams that have a ton of cap space, I still prefer these types of deals than giving fringe guys big contracts in free agency.
That being said I don’t really understand how or why gave up assets to acquire Trouba at full cap. He should of been free. But not a big deal.
He’s obviously a deteriorated asset but the Rangers did have a good run of being very competitive and making some noise in the playoffs. The ducks being a young team could really benefit from a guy like that from a mentorship perspective and you honestly can’t write off what a change of scenery might do for him.
Cap is going up substantially in next three years and if your prospect cupboard is already pretty full which sounds like it is, they likely have done long term projections about who/where these guys will fit along with timelines. They clearly have a gap in top 9 for the next year to two so they’re filling it with him.
Would I do it if I were Anaheim? No. But, that’s likely why they’re looking into it.
I understand that the Rangers just wanted to cut bait with both players, but imagine keeping a straight face 3 years ago if someone told you an NHL GM would trade Jacob Trouba and Chris Kreider for Urho Vaakanainen, Carey Terrance, a conditional second-round pick and a conditional fourth-round pick.
Rangers PP sucked because the go to play was to feed Zibenajad at the left circle to flub the one timer. If we get him Charlie Sheen's glasses from Major League, we will be top 5 again.In fairness, even in a year where the Rangers PP was putrid for a good 2/3rds of the season, ending up 28th in the league, it was still better than Anaheim at 32nd. Somehow almost a full 6% lower than the Rangers.
Kreider could well mean a meaningful improvement on the PP for Anaheim, especially if he rebounds to previous years levels. He'd also help their 29th ranked PK unit