Unsurprisingly
I believe he also called that Mesar would play here this year too.You pretty much had this called and confirmed from the beginning. The Sens board was really adamant he was staying in Europe!
After he signed his ELC - I had heard (I also believe that there was a news article that alluded to it) that the only reason he signed was to get out from his contract in Finland so he could play for Kitchener.You pretty much had this called and confirmed from the beginning. The Sens board was really adamant he was staying in Europe!
I think Mesar and Montreal’s decision will come later, and maybe even he starts games with Laval for initial assessment.I believe he also called that Mesar would play here this year too.
Waiting patiently.
That would be a massive fail. For me, Longacre is one thing, but Hage is another.Sounds like they are not declaring Hage defective. Big gamble. Would be a big fail if neither Hage nor Longacre end up a Ranger.
If Hage burns his NCAA eligibility, wouldn't he be barred from playing in the USHL? (Part statement...part question)That would be a massive fail. For me, Longacre is one thing, but Hage is another.
Seems Longacre may need some convincing but I said before ice time may be an issue with him at 16. I’d be happy if he came to camp and if he chose big minutes at a lower level, then fine.
Playing in Chicago this year gives NCAA recruiters a year to get into the Hage camp’s heads to go that route.
I’d be a whole lot more comfortable if he’d swing by the Aud long enough to burn his eligibility. Show some sort of commitment to the Rangers if he really 100% plans on playing here. Something in the ballpark that Meireles did as a 16 year old.
Problem is, I’d want him to do it before the September defective player window ends.
I have no idea. I also have no idea if he’d even be able to come here after having been committed to and attending the Steel camp. Surely he could come, but would they have him back? Would rules not allow him back? Would he be burning a bridge?If Hage burns his NCAA eligibility, wouldn't he be barred from playing in the USHL? (Part statement...part question)
no, who guys played in the ohl play in the ushl all the time.If Hage burns his NCAA eligibility, wouldn't he be barred from playing in the USHL? (Part statement...part question)
Nope. Marcus Dickerson a few years back played for Mississauga then ended up in USHL with Des Moines.If Hage burns his NCAA eligibility, wouldn't he be barred from playing in the USHL? (Part statement...part question)
Also, last September, teams were able to deem players drafted in the 1st round of the 2020 draft as defective (Fantilli for example). Was that a one time deal because of the lost Covid season or can teams now deem a player defective after hanging onto his rights for a year?
I wouldn't call it a big fail. I am sure the Rangers know what the gamble is when they take a flyer on a skilled player other teams pass on. I think any team in the league would be smart to grab a player like Hage if he was available. He is one of the best rookies I have seen in many years. Heads and tails above everyone in the rookie camp. If they do show up eventually its a massive win.Sounds like they are not declaring Hage defective. Big gamble. Would be a big fail if neither Hage nor Longacre end up a Ranger.
Any time you don't sign your top 2 picks, I don't see how you label it as a massive fail.I wouldn't call it a big fail. I am sure the Rangers know what the gamble is when they take a flyer on a skilled player other teams pass on. I think any team in the league would be smart to grab a player like Hage if he was available. He is one of the best rookies I have seen in many years. Heads and tails above everyone in the rookie camp. If they do show up eventually its a massive win.
You can't be satisfied with your 1st pick showing up for only one season, two at the most if he spends two seasons in the USHL. You need your top pick on your roster ASAP.Two points on Hage. Let him do the USHL for two seasons, he will be in Kitchener to finish out his Junior.
Also by selecting him, MM kept him out of London.
Really looking forward to seeing the team you guys ice this season.
Yeah that;s all time loser talk pretending its a good thing to potentually waste a 1st round pick to keep a guy from someone else.If your strategy for drafting is to keep players away from other clubs, I would think your team would have limited success.
Ok. Make it personal.Yeah that;s all time loser talk pretending its a good thing to potentually waste a 1st round pick to keep a guy from someone else.
I tihnk taking Hage will end up a good thing because im sure he will come. I just dont think you can spin that even if you potentially waste a first it could be a good thing because it kept him from londonOk. Make it personal.
Merely made an observation. Nowhere did I state it was a strategy, just turns out it was a bonus.
Too many factors at play these days. It is entirely likely Hage goes NCAA, many kids are doing that these days.
Looking forward to the Blue White games today and tomorrow. Mostly returning players but a chance to see Brzustewicz in action. And I can't help but wonder if they'll have more of a look at Lex Terrence now that Longacre has decided to stay in the States. He's a 2006 with the size and will need to bulk up. But perhaps a younger D over one of the older ones we've discussed?
On forward, there could be a couple of spots open. Does Thomakos, McGurn, or Macchione have a chance of coming onboard. And Mathieu Comeau (an invite) is an interesting prospect. 6' 185 lbs 41pts in 48 games with the Hearst Lumberjacks in the NOJHL. And there's Carson McGurn (Sean's brother) who has bounced back from injuries and has a nice upside.