I somewhat understand why people are suggesting they sell next year because there are a couple teams the project above them - but at that point if they do they'll never actually make a push. I think they'll need to see how the offseason goes, how the import draft goes and what the OA market looks like late next summer before deciding to sell - there is ABSOLUTELY NO way they go into next season planning to be seller.
Miedema reminds me of one of those all the tools no toolbox players - isolated, a lot of his attributes are really good, but for some reason he can't put it all together.
Kingston is not a seller next year. They may not end up being a push in buyer but definitely not a seller.
A handful of team in the Eastern Conference will tinker a bit and spend wisely. Just because they may not be a championship contender, it doesn’t mean they cannot compete at a strong level.
The teams in a Kingston situation next year that could justify selling are teams that NEED to recoup assets and picks because of a previous push. I don’t see Kingston on serious need of recouping draft picks.
There may be an strategy at play to stockpile surplus picks but that doesn’t normally happen over one season. It is normally a gradual accumulation.
I could see Sudbury and North Bay being traditional sellers. I see Barrie, Ottawa, Kingston and maybe Oshawa as potential tinker type teams that sell and buy strategically without seriously upsetting their competitiveness. I’m see Brantford and Brampton as traditional buyers. Petes and Niagara continue with their rebuilds but not sellers. Strategic buyers if players with term are available.
Oshawa may pop into the same category as Brantford and Brampton but, like Kingston, may not have the assets to play in the deep end of the pool.