Proposal: Kappo Kakko for Jayden Struble + NJ 3rd

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

samsagat

Registered User
Jun 20, 2013
1,148
857
The NYR are short in defensemen, with Lindgren injury.

Particularly LHD.
Even with Lindgren, some more depth on the left side wouldn't be a luxury for the Rangers.

MTL need offense, with Laine apparently out long term.
Kakko isn't really an offensive contributor as of now, but MTL are in a position to bet on those kind of gambles.

Kakko for Struble + a 3rd
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,043
20,671
Easy no from the Rangers. No point in trading him unless we're getting back something of actual value. Struble and a 3rd isn't it.
 

GTA

Registered User
Jul 12, 2012
2,112
1,115
Toronto
The NYR are short in defensemen, with Lindgren injury.

Particularly LHD.
Even with Lindgren, some more depth on the left side wouldn't be a luxury for the Rangers.

MTL need offense, with Laine apparently out long term.
Kakko isn't really an offensive contributor as of now, but MTL are in a position to bet on those kind of gambles.

Kakko for Struble + a 3rd
Why are the Habs as a bottom team trying to plug holes in the present team by trading futures. This is nonsense.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
23,920
16,640
The NYR are short in defensemen, with Lindgren injury.

Particularly LHD.
Even with Lindgren, some more depth on the left side wouldn't be a luxury for the Rangers.

MTL need offense, with Laine apparently out long term.
Kakko isn't really an offensive contributor as of now, but MTL are in a position to bet on those kind of gambles.

Kakko for Struble + a 3rd

I could see a deal like this happen but I don't think the Habs add that high if a pick if they even add at all.

1:1 or Strubble + a late pick (5-7th) seems more likely based on where the two players are at both performance -wise and cap/contract situations.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad