Value of: Kane and Lafferty to Tampa

Flat Ronnie

Registered User
Feb 11, 2014
5,851
3,237
People are gonna shit all over this but if Kane wants to go to Tampa what are the Blackhawks gonna do?

Either keep him and get nothing, or trade him for the best you can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DingDongCharlie

EddieTheEagle

Registered User
Sep 17, 2006
1,547
3,103
With Chicago owning so many Tampa picks, I can't see them helping them much. They don't want them to do well. Unless they are sending them to sabotage... It is pure genius.

Ultimately though, I'm not sure TB has enough assets left to do this? They'd need to dump players + add value for Kane and Laff. Isaac Howard is a decent prospect but that's almost where it ends...
 

Flat Ronnie

Registered User
Feb 11, 2014
5,851
3,237
With Chicago owning so many Tampa picks, I can't see them helping them much. They don't want them to do well. Unless they are sending them to sabotage... It is pure genius.

Ultimately though, I'm not sure TB has enough assets left to do this? They'd need to dump players + add value for Kane and Laff. Isaac Howard is a decent prospect but that's almost where it ends...
Kane controls everything in this situation. If he only wants to go to one or two places the Hawks don't have a lot of options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DistantThunderRep

EddieTheEagle

Registered User
Sep 17, 2006
1,547
3,103
Kane controls everything in this situation. If he only wants to go to one or two places the Hawks don't have a lot of options.
I don't disagree. If it is Tampa or bust, they'd do it. It'll just be a weird return and I doubt they'd include Lafferty just to boost them even more.
 

rojac

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2007
13,299
3,141
Waterloo, ON
People are gonna shit all over this but if Kane wants to go to Tampa what are the Blackhawks gonna do?

Either keep him and get nothing, or trade him for the best you can.
I doubt Kane will limit his list of places he’ll go to one team. i believe when he talked about his decision, he mentioned doing right by the team by giving them his decision at least a week before the deadline. So he may feel he also do right by them by giving them options.

And why would he want to go to a team like Tampa Bay that’s going to lose in the first round? :D



just kidding, I think it’s going to be another close series.
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,360
15,986
How would: they even do that?

Forget the money because I'm sure that part can be worked out.

But if I'm not mistaken they don't have a 1st until 2025.

How would this get done?
 

These Are The Days

I need about tree fiddy
May 17, 2014
35,408
21,412
Tampa Bay
Is it true Sergachev takes more dumb penalties than Perry? I was reading your guys boards the other day

Serg does so much dumb shit I have started to call him Windows 98 for it. Why? Because who in their right mind would use it just like no one in their right mind would do even half the dumb shit he does on a nightly basis
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,422
23,319
Chicagoland
Would the Lightning be able to afford both Kane and Lafferty in deal? Would be hard for you guys to fit Kane which would require a 3rd party involved to eat 25% of Kane's remaining cap + Hawks taking Namestnikov and Myers in deal

I dont see how you could afford both Kane and Lafferty with the cap room you have
 

Point21

Registered User
Oct 23, 2018
9,826
7,653
Would the Lightning be able to afford both Kane and Lafferty in deal? Would be hard for you guys to fit Kane which would require a 3rd party involved to eat 25% of Kane's remaining cap + Hawks taking Namestnikov and Myers in deal

I dont see how you could afford both Kane and Lafferty with the cap room you have
we can fit both in just moving Namestnikov and Foote in the deal as long as we get a 3rd team in for max retention on Kane
 

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,099
9,644
Tampa Bay
Hawks would simply have to be willing to accept a larger package of lesser pieces for the Lightning to have a chance. We don’t have blue chip prospects or 1sts
 
  • Like
Reactions: DistantThunderRep

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,422
23,319
Chicagoland
we can fit both in just moving Namestnikov and Foote in the deal as long as we get a 3rd team in for max retention on Kane

Looking at Capfriendly it doesn't appear possible for TB to add Kane (50% + 25%) and Lafferty by moving those two

And moving Myers is bigger benefit for Lightning cap wise then Foote
 

Point21

Registered User
Oct 23, 2018
9,826
7,653
Looking at Capfriendly it doesn't appear possible for TB to add Kane (50% + 25%) and Lafferty by moving those two
right now Tampa has 720k in cap. Foote and Vladdy are 3.35m. so Tampa would have $4,070,000 in cap space. Kane at max retention is 2.625 and Lafferty is 1.15. would leave Tampa with just about 300k in cap space
 

Northernhawk

Registered User
Feb 22, 2020
2,629
1,340
With Chicago owning so many Tampa picks, I can't see them helping them much. They don't want them to do well. Unless they are sending them to sabotage... It is pure genius.

Ultimately though, I'm not sure TB has enough assets left to do this? They'd need to dump players + add value for Kane and Laff. Isaac Howard is a decent prospect but that's almost where it ends...
Exactly, they’ve actually done the opposite and helped out TB divisional rivals...
Dach to MTL
DeBrincat to OTT
Mrazek out of TOR lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: EddieTheEagle

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,422
23,319
Chicagoland
Hawks would simply have to be willing to accept a larger package of lesser pieces for the Lightning to have a chance. We don’t have blue chip prospects or 1sts

Looking at Lightning there are really only 4 pieces that are appealing

Lightning 2025 1st
Lightning 2024 2nd
LW Issac Howard
LW Dylan Duke

Maybe C Gage Concalves would be appealing as well he seems to be doing ok in AHL

right now Tampa has 720k in cap. Foote and Vladdy are 3.35m. so Tampa would have $4,070,000 in cap space. Kane at max retention is 2.625 and Lafferty is 1.15. would leave Tampa with just about 300k in cap space

Cap Friendly Trade calculator doesn't seem to agree with this but maybe its wrong or I am doing it wrong

To :bolts
RW Patrick Kane (50% retained by Hawks+ 25% retained by 3rd party)
C/W Sam Lafferty

To :hawks
C Vladislav Namistnikov
LW Isaac Howard
LW Dylan Duke
Lightning 2024 2nd
Lightning 2025 1st

To 3rd party team
D Cal Foote
Hawks 2023 4th round pick

Maybe something like this

I would be fine with this deal. Howard/Duke have potential and those picks provide more draft capitol for rebuild effort.

At end of day only really think TB would be in on Lafferty or potentially Domi not Kane
 
Last edited:

WhereAreTheCookies

Registered User
Feb 16, 2022
3,242
5,543
Top Shelf
Looking at Capfriendly it doesn't appear possible for TB to add Kane (50% + 25%) and Lafferty by moving those two

And moving Myers is bigger benefit for Lightning cap wise then Foote
What if Kane's hip is bothering him too much to play, and he needs a month or so of physical therapy to get it back into playing condition. :sarcasm:
 

LTIR Trickery

Plz stop pucks
Jun 27, 2007
23,951
2,776
Scrip Club
One good night against Toronto and Tampa fans want him to join their team, despite him sucking the rest of the year. Scared of facing Toronto, Tampa fans?
The leafs have done nothing of note since the 60s and you're trying to talk shit to us?

Looking at Lightning there are really only 4 pieces that are appealing

Lightning 2025 1st
Lightning 2024 2nd
LW Issac Howard
LW Dylan Duke

Maybe C Gage Concalves would be appealing as well he seems to be doing ok in AHL



Cap Friendly Trade calculator doesn't seem to agree with this but maybe its wrong or I am doing it wrong

To :bolts
RW Patrick Kane (50% retained by Hawks+ 25% retained by 3rd party)
C/W Sam Lafferty

To :hawks
C Vladislav Namistnikov
LW Isaac Howard
LW Dylan Duke
Lightning 2024 2nd
Lightning 2025 1st

To 3rd party team
D Cal Foote
Hawks 2023 4th round pick

Maybe something like this

I would be fine with this deal. Howard/Duke have potential and those picks provide more draft capitol for rebuild effort.

At end of day only really think TB would be in on Lafferty or potentially Domi not Kane
Haha anything else we can throw in for you, a new car, maybe a nice steak dinner? Jesus.
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,982
7,925
Assuming Kane would waive for Tampa, what would be a realistic value from Tampa that could land both Kane and Lafferty

With Chicago owning so many Tampa picks, I can't see them helping them much...
Gotta assume something like the Hagel return [Lafferty ain't Hagel(yet), but Kane included],
plus Tampa probably the team to comp the 3rd team which retains on Kane.

And as noted, Hawks have a vested interest in Bolts season ending sooner, rather than later

so this one is hard to see actually happening
 

Aoko

Order has now fallen.
Dec 14, 2017
4,301
4,202
Absolutely no flyin f***ing way Tampa can get Patrick Kane as well. With the way our cap books are? We don't want to fall in love with him and want to find a way to f*** up the books even more by trying to resign him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad