- Jan 22, 2007
- 14,689
- 7,807
Kakko without an inch of doubt.
He is a complete bull in the corners and around the paint, even more so than Matthews. In fact, he reminds me of Marian Hossa or Peter Forsberg in that regard. His protection game is already elite at 18 and he'll round out to be a 6-4, 220 pound horse who's hungrier than Barkov in close. Plain and simple, Kakko has a winner's DNA.
Laine has a world-class shot and nothing else high-end to his game. He's not a great skater. He's a decent passer. He's not overly physical. He doesn't protect the puck well at all. He lacks intensity. He's moody. But his shot is off-the-charts great... one of the best releases I've seen since the 70's.
If I wanted to make fancy highlight videos, I'd go Laine. But I want to win hockey games, so I'll go Kakko... without thinking twice.
He is a complete bull in the corners and around the paint, even more so than Matthews. In fact, he reminds me of Marian Hossa or Peter Forsberg in that regard. His protection game is already elite at 18 and he'll round out to be a 6-4, 220 pound horse who's hungrier than Barkov in close. Plain and simple, Kakko has a winner's DNA.
Laine has a world-class shot and nothing else high-end to his game. He's not a great skater. He's a decent passer. He's not overly physical. He doesn't protect the puck well at all. He lacks intensity. He's moody. But his shot is off-the-charts great... one of the best releases I've seen since the 70's.
If I wanted to make fancy highlight videos, I'd go Laine. But I want to win hockey games, so I'll go Kakko... without thinking twice.