I stopped reading after you said half the players I listed were wingers.
Not a single one is a winger. They're all natural centers; some of which SLIDE TO WING because of their team's remarkable center depth, which even further bolsters my point.
Being a center on your team and a natural center are not the same thing. You can't list all players capable of playing C and compare them to your team's centers. ROR didn't play much C last year - he played with Matt Duchene. It's an unfair comparison. There's different defensive duties, responsibilities, it's a much tougher position playing C.
Stepan is not a legitimate 1C.
Patrice Bergeron isn't a legitimate 1C either.
He's a very good, versatile two-way center.
Okay. And you're the only one who doesn't think Patrice Bergeron isn't a legitimate 1C. What the hell is your definition of "legitimate 1C"? There's 30 teams, and apparently, Patrice Bergeron isn't a legitimate 1C. I'm pretty sure if that's the case, there are about 10 legitimate 1Cs in the NHL, and I would take Bergeron over Thornton, Spezza, Staal, etc. Bergeron is a superior player. And I've criticized those who have called him elite in the past, because I don't think he's elite. I think you're asking for us to get an elite center - and those guys are NOT available unless you pick in the top 5 of the draft. The available Cs are all worse players than Patrice Bergeron, so, I'm not sure where you're going with this. Patrice Bergeron is certainly a legitimate 1C and it's really not a discussion. There's no argument to be made here.
How can you not see that this team lacks a bonafide center that ranks among the names I listed?
I can see that. I just don't think that acquiring that center is as big a need as you do. I'm not willing to destroy the chemistry of our core and add another $7+M player to our lineup to improve one position. We also have crazy wing depth that those teams don't have, and defensive depth, and a top 3 goalie in the NHL. Being average at C isn't the worst thing in the world when you have 5 wingers who can play a top 6 role and 4 defensemen who can play on a top pairing, as well as Henrik Lundqvist. And I think Derek Stepan is already a 1C and could move into the Bergeron category very soon.
Are we going to draft a Crosby or MacKinnon? Of course not. We've acquired our top line wingers via trade (Nash, MSL), our top pair defenseman via trade (McDonagh). We're going to have to acquire our top line center the same way, unless Patrick Kane somehow hits FA and signs here for 12mil per year.
Patrick Kane is a winger. They tried him at center and he won something like 40% of faceoffs and moved him back to wing. He's a winger.
Crosby, MacKinnon, Thornton, Spezza, Malkin, E. Staal, Seguin, Stepan.
Which name doesn't fit in there?
E. Staal, Spezza, and Stepan seem not to fit. Arguably Thornton, too. I'm not sure what criteria you're using because none of those players are alike.
To a team that gave up a 70 point, Selke caliber player (which we don't have), a promising young player in Smith, who scored 50+ points last season, and a former 2011 first round defenseman, and Seguin's team missed the playoffs. Boston was the #1 seed pretty easily, despite Eriksson not contributing due to injuries. And - oh my god! - a young player stepped in and scored 50 points unexpectedly. Wow. How silly of them.
Because he demanded the trade.
And has won absolutely nothing.
It is possible to acquire a 1C via trade, and if one is available, second line centers like Derek Stepan or Derick Brassard aren't holding up any deal to get one, no matter how much the "fans" love their own homegrown players.
Brassard shouldn't hold up a deal for the right player - but I'm not fond of acquiring Eric Staal, Joe Thornton, or Jason Spezza (thank god that ship sailed) for Brassard+ or Brassard++. It's a mistake.
Stepan, on the other hand, should only be moved in a package for an elite level C - and those players are not available unless you acquire them prior to them reaching that status or with a top 5 pick in the draft.