Judge rules that Melinda Karlsson doesn't have to give Monika Caryk cyberbullying evidence | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Judge rules that Melinda Karlsson doesn't have to give Monika Caryk cyberbullying evidence

There is none pointing to her so its none of her business, or she will be charged soon and they will send her all they have at that time.

Go down and ask for all the info in any ongoing investigation, I am sure 'go away' is and always will be the answer.
Now once that new contract is signed by EK he could find himself being sued for all this by the hoff and his girl. If it cant be proven they did it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StDevs
That’s leaving out some pretty key info.

“The judge, however, did make clear that while Caryk is looking for evidence, there simply isn’t any information before the court to suggest any such evidence exists or that Caryk was responsible for the online posts.

“Other than Mrs. Karlsson’s bald assertion and, maybe, a weak inference arising from the circumstance that Ms. Caryk knew exactly where to look for nasty posts, there is simply no evidence that Ms. Caryk did make any such postings.””
 
There is none pointing to her so its none of her business, or she will be charged soon and they will send her all they have at that time.

Go down and ask for all the info in any ongoing investigation, I am sure 'go away' is and always will be the answer.
Now once that new contract is signed by EK he could find himself being sued for all this by the hoff and his girl. If it cant be proven they did it.

Yeah nothing like being tried in public.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chips
There is none pointing to her so its none of her business, or she will be charged soon and they will send her all they have at that time.

Go down and ask for all the info in any ongoing investigation, I am sure 'go away' is and always will be the answer.
Now once that new contract is signed by EK he could find himself being sued for all this by the hoff and his girl. If it cant be proven they did it.

You are talking about a criminal process and Hoffman's fiancee sounds like she is pursuing a civil process. There is no investigation or charges in a civil trial.
 
You are talking about a criminal process and Hoffman's fiancee sounds like she is pursuing a civil process. There is no investigation or charges in a civil trial.

It says the police launched an inestigation. Unless she sues karlsson and his wife, or she is charged,its none of her business what they found so far.
 
Anyways does this mean Melinda Karlsson was lying the whole time?

No. It could mean that, but it could also mean that she was mistaken, or that she was correct but doesn’t have the evidence to prove it. Without charges being laid, the court isn’t taking a position on which one is the truth.

Isn't this considered slander and caused Hoffman to lose his place of work?

That does seem like a distinct possibility here.
 
Judge made a terrible decision here. Now Caryk's character is in question without any validity to the rumors her accuser spread. So really Caryk's only option now is go to after Melinda karlsson, a mother still mourning the death of her infant . What a great position Caryk is in.
 
Last edited:
No. It could mean that, but it could also mean that she was mistaken, or that she was correct but doesn’t have the evidence to prove it. Without charges being laid, the court isn’t taking a position on which one is the truth.



That does seem like a distinct possibility here.

But a restraining order if was even temporarily issued would still have legal ramifications for Ms. Caryk.

That is exactly correct when it comes to your second point.
 
Pretty terrible thing if Melinda Caryk was falsely accused here.
Judge made a terrible decision here. Now Caryk's character is in question without any validity to the rumors her accuser spread. So really Caryk's only option now is go to after Melinda hoffman, a mother still mourning the death of her infant . What a great position Caryk is in.
I continually keep getting confused on who is who since sooo many posters keep posting the wrong names.

So for clarification for everyone, it's: Monica Caryk and Melinda Karlsson.
 
Court records reveal how events unfolded before Karlsson-Hoffman dispute became public

This article above shows some other wives of Senators/NHL players accusing Caryk of hating/bullying Melinda.

- Pageau's wife texted Caryk to stay away from Melinda
- Jason LaBarbera's wife accusing Caryk of cyberbullying
- Daniel Winnick's wife accusing Caryk of cyberbullying Melinda
- Mark Stone's girlfriend emailing Caryk to stay away from Melinda

And just a refresher, wives of Kyle Turris, Andrew Hammond also came out publicly to defend Melinda Karlsson:

Other NHL wives show support for Melinda Karlsson

I know there is nothing yet that we know of that proves Caryk was behind all this, but I just find it odd how public other hockey wives have come forward in this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irunthepeg

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad