Alex Mogilny is not in the HHOF, which pretty much cements it as a cliquey farce (like most things affiliated with hockey and the NHL).It's unfortunate, given the regular season that he had, that his final playoff run was such a wet fart. In a reasonable universe he's in the HoF the moment he's eligible, but who knows in this one?
Based on what? He had a solid career, but there's hundreds of players with this exact career not in the hallIt's unfortunate, given the regular season that he had, that his final playoff run was such a wet fart. In a reasonable universe he's in the HoF the moment he's eligible, but who knows in this one?
RIP, had a great career. Could make HoF one day.
NateMan, his son Nick will be drafted in 2028, he couldn’t hold out until then and do a LeBron?
No he didn’t die lolDid he also die? If so, thread title should be updated.
I forgot theNo he didn’t die lol
Joe Pavelski is #60 in career NHL games played, #55 in goals, and #71 in points.Based on what? He had a solid career, but there's hundreds of players with this exact career not in the hall
Actually not a fan of this graphic the NHL used because you can't tell the story of Pavelski without his playoff performances, which mean a hell of a lot more than regular season games.Neat little "games played" quirk that I never noticed before......963 games with the Sharks, 369 games with Dallas?
How perfect is that.![]()
Is it? He has a 2nd team AS and not a single other thing on his resume. Dany Heatley, 192 in points has more. Kevin Stevens 243rd in scoring has more. There's nothing except compiling stats to name here and there's players with less of both who had more impact.Joe Pavelski is #60 in career NHL games played, #55 in goals, and #71 in points.
This is obviously a very superficial look - in no way am I attempting to account for defensemen, goalies, defense played by forwards, differing season lengths or scoring levels in different seasons. Those are all huge caveats.
However, I think "hundreds of players with this exact career" is, well, more than exaggerating.
Are you assuming that awards recognition is an accurate summation of any player's actual impact? Because I wouldn't trust awards, in any sport, to tell me the sky was blue.Is it? He has a 2nd team AS and not a single other thing on his resume. Dany Heatley, 192 in points has more. Kevin Stevens 243rd in scoring has more. There's nothing except compiling stats to name here and there's players with less of both who had more impact.
"Elite" is just a tad too generous. He was a good player, really good. Not great. Certainly not elite.Hung them up at pretty much the exact moment that his game fell off. I give him a lot of credit for being an elite player pretty much all the way to the end, then pulling the plug when the elite play just wasn't there anymore.
Do I agree with every award ever? No. I do think however that if someone was missed here and there at some point it would be at least talked about. he's never been talked about outside of "he's really good at 39". At some point you have to look at the law of averages and realize that he was below that level for all but one season, and even at that, a lesser position. i like the guy, and the player, but there's lots like him every year of every decade hockey has existed. Good, but not great playersAre you assuming that awards recognition is an accurate summation of any player's actual impact? Because I wouldn't trust awards, in any sport, to tell me the sky was blue.