Does anybody besides me remember Jimmy Carson with Edmonton during 1988-89, and, yeah, the first four games of the next season?
There have been Carson threads before about what his potential might have been, etc., and there's that memorable "What Ever Happened to Jimmy Carson?" article by The Hockey Writers: http://thehockeywriters.com/what-ever-happened-to-jimmy-carson/
But do you remember him playing for Edmonton during 1988-89? I was 12 or 13 back then, and so hero-worshiped the Oilers and followed them closely. I'd already been a fan of Carson from his previous season with L.A., and once I got over the shock of the Gretzky 'trade', I was kind of excited to see Carson play for Edmonton. I figured he'd be great, and probably score 50+ goals and a bunch of points, etc.
Carson later painted the portrait of himself as the victim of the trade, saying that the fans couldn't accept him as the replacement for Gretzky. I must say, I never bought that silly argument. Nobody in their right mind expected Carson to replace Gretzky, and I don't remember Edmonton fans being disappointed with him at all (well, maybe until the playoffs).
In fact, he scored at a furious rate after a slow start to the season. He scored twice on opening night against the Islanders, and then went cold for eight games. With 6 goals in the first 15 games, he seemed to be fighting it a bit. Then he went crazy in the next 27 games, scoring 28 goals. At that point, he was on pace for 61, a career high. But then he scored only 7 in his next 25 games...! He ended up with 49 goals (only 5 fewer than Gretzky in L.A.), and 100 points, which was only 2 fewer than Jari Kurri for the team lead. But he certainly cooled off over the late-part of the season, and then disappointed in the playoffs (most-bizarre-series-ever, as it was) against L.A., with 3 points in 7 games.
What I've never understood is how he agreed to come back the next season, but then lasted only 4 games before quitting on the team and sitting out. Like, why did he agree to come back in the first place? (Thus was the first in a long line of players who demanded trades out of Edmonton or refused to come.)
I absolutely reject the idea that Edmonton fans were disappointed in Carson or expected him to 'replace' Gretzky (good luck with that). My memory is that fans welcomed him with open arms and cheered him on. It's clear that he didn't "fit in" with the very-local Canadian hockey culture in the Edmonton dressing room, but did that in any way justify his quitting on the team? Sather pulled off a coup by getting Klima, Murphy, and Graves for Carson in November 1989, which basically won the 1990 Stanley Cup for Edmonton.
Why do you think Carson quit on Edmonton, as he did? Why did he come back to the team in September 1989, if he was just going to quit a week or two later?
How would he have done if he'd stayed there? The Oilers were still stacked with talent in 1989-90, and Carson could have taken a back-seat to Messier and ridden his coat-tails a bit without having to worry about being a #1 center. Would the Oilers have in any way won that Cup with Carson (and not Klima, Murphy, Graves) on board?
Carson scored more goals as a teenager (92) than any other player in NHL history. He was a near-certain Hall of Famer in 1988/89 at 21. By age 24, he was frequently scratched. By 26, he was basically done in the NHL. Would all that decline have been avoided if he'd stuck it out in Edmonton? (He ended up in Detroit, where he wanted to go, but was low on the totem-pole there with a lot of good centers.)
There have been Carson threads before about what his potential might have been, etc., and there's that memorable "What Ever Happened to Jimmy Carson?" article by The Hockey Writers: http://thehockeywriters.com/what-ever-happened-to-jimmy-carson/
But do you remember him playing for Edmonton during 1988-89? I was 12 or 13 back then, and so hero-worshiped the Oilers and followed them closely. I'd already been a fan of Carson from his previous season with L.A., and once I got over the shock of the Gretzky 'trade', I was kind of excited to see Carson play for Edmonton. I figured he'd be great, and probably score 50+ goals and a bunch of points, etc.
Carson later painted the portrait of himself as the victim of the trade, saying that the fans couldn't accept him as the replacement for Gretzky. I must say, I never bought that silly argument. Nobody in their right mind expected Carson to replace Gretzky, and I don't remember Edmonton fans being disappointed with him at all (well, maybe until the playoffs).
In fact, he scored at a furious rate after a slow start to the season. He scored twice on opening night against the Islanders, and then went cold for eight games. With 6 goals in the first 15 games, he seemed to be fighting it a bit. Then he went crazy in the next 27 games, scoring 28 goals. At that point, he was on pace for 61, a career high. But then he scored only 7 in his next 25 games...! He ended up with 49 goals (only 5 fewer than Gretzky in L.A.), and 100 points, which was only 2 fewer than Jari Kurri for the team lead. But he certainly cooled off over the late-part of the season, and then disappointed in the playoffs (most-bizarre-series-ever, as it was) against L.A., with 3 points in 7 games.
What I've never understood is how he agreed to come back the next season, but then lasted only 4 games before quitting on the team and sitting out. Like, why did he agree to come back in the first place? (Thus was the first in a long line of players who demanded trades out of Edmonton or refused to come.)
I absolutely reject the idea that Edmonton fans were disappointed in Carson or expected him to 'replace' Gretzky (good luck with that). My memory is that fans welcomed him with open arms and cheered him on. It's clear that he didn't "fit in" with the very-local Canadian hockey culture in the Edmonton dressing room, but did that in any way justify his quitting on the team? Sather pulled off a coup by getting Klima, Murphy, and Graves for Carson in November 1989, which basically won the 1990 Stanley Cup for Edmonton.
Why do you think Carson quit on Edmonton, as he did? Why did he come back to the team in September 1989, if he was just going to quit a week or two later?
How would he have done if he'd stayed there? The Oilers were still stacked with talent in 1989-90, and Carson could have taken a back-seat to Messier and ridden his coat-tails a bit without having to worry about being a #1 center. Would the Oilers have in any way won that Cup with Carson (and not Klima, Murphy, Graves) on board?
Carson scored more goals as a teenager (92) than any other player in NHL history. He was a near-certain Hall of Famer in 1988/89 at 21. By age 24, he was frequently scratched. By 26, he was basically done in the NHL. Would all that decline have been avoided if he'd stuck it out in Edmonton? (He ended up in Detroit, where he wanted to go, but was low on the totem-pole there with a lot of good centers.)