At best, it's an one for one trade, even with the premise that "teams don't trade their top players".Tkachuk/Stutzle might get the conversation started but it won't be a long conversation if the Sens aren't willing to add.
Team's usually don't work through cap issues by trading their top players so I just don't see a world were Roberson is actually available.
At best, it's an one for one trade, even with the premise that "teams don't trade their top players".
There's no way Ottawa is adding to Stutzle for Robertson. It would likely be the other way around.Tkachuk/Stutzle might get the conversation started but it won't be a long conversation if the Sens aren't willing to add.
Team's usually don't work through cap issues by trading their top players so I just don't see a world were Roberson is actually available.
There's no way Ottawa is adding to Stutzle for Robertson. It would likely be the other way around.
agree, as a neutral fan I would take Stützle over Robertson 10/10 time.There's no way Ottawa is adding to Stutzle for Robertson. It would likely be the other way around.
agree, as a neutral fan I would take Stützle over Robertson 10/10 time.
Not even close for Brady Thachuk either
I know you mean Will Smith, but I wish you didn't. LolIf the Stars move Robertson for cap reasons it’s a futures deal to a team that wants to a jump like SJ for Will Power + a 2nd.
I am sure no DAL fan would agree with you here.And yet Robertson outproduces those guys every year while being a key driver for a better team.
Because Stutzle is a much better player. He also out produced Robertson this year in less games while being younger and playing the more important position.Why would Dallas trade Robertson + for a guy who produces less?
Robertson for more WIll Power would be a good upgrade for DAL these playoffs.I know you mean Will Smith, but I wish you didn't. Lol
I am sure no DAL fan would agree with you here.
Stutzle can play C and is younger than Robertson. Both him and Brady are much better physically and should do a lot better than Jason 4th liner Rpbertson in playoffs.
Because Stutzle is a much better player. He also out produced Robertson this year in less games while being younger and playing the more important position.
Stutzle 84 points in 88 games
Robertson 83 points in 91 games
Chabot for Robertson
Who says No?
What does 19 year old Stutzle have to do with his value now?Last 4 years:
- Robertson 395 points
- Stutzle 320 points.
Robertson has averaged a 64 point pace in the playoffs in the last 4 years, while averaging a 90 point pace in the regular season in that same span.Pretty disingenuous representation of Jason Robertson considering he put 16 and 18 points in playoff the last two years while averaging 20 more points than tkachuk every year.
What does 19 year old Stutzle have to do with his value now?
I noticed how you didn't bother to add their games played either. Comical.
Go ahead and make a poll, the overwhelming majority of fans would value Stutzle way ahead of Robertson.
What does 19 year old Stutzle have to do with his value now?374 for Robertson and 320 for Stutzle giving Robo 1.04 points/game and 0.94 points/game for Stutzle
What does 19 year old Stutzle have to do with his value now?
B.Tkachuk is probably as untouchable than Stutzle if not more.Dallas doesn't need anymore LHD. Chabot also wouldn't get a shot on our PP.
Robertson for Brady as a base is the only thing that I think Stars' fans would be interested in.
I assume Stutzle and Sanderson are totally untouchable, and Brady and Chabot are probably close to untouchable too.