Player Discussion: Jake Guentzel

LightningStrikes

Champa Bay Lightning
Nov 24, 2009
26,617
10,562
giphy.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Stelio Kontos

Tampa22

Eternally grateful TBL enforcers!
Oct 11, 2010
485
281
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Is he good enough or is easy to play with Kuchergod and Point?
I remember Sustr playing with Hedman (in his prime) was one thing, another with a mediocre partner. Today if you have those smart players at your side Svitov or Volkov could be stars that we thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hollel

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,271
9,796
Tampa Bay
So... is Guentzel-Paul a real thing?

Because that could be huge. We know 38-21-86 works.

I always wanted to see us try something besides stacking the top line, seems like it might be worth it here.

Our second line has been great this year too, I think it's lines 3 and 4 that need help.

So the question is, does Paul go back to centering the third line when Point returns?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hoek

OffBy1

Registered User
Aug 5, 2021
590
609
Like who?
My unenthusiastic suggestions from last year's free agents were Teravainen and Monahan. I was thinking those two because they were more affordable and we needed multiple forwards. Monahan is doing well for Columbus, Teravainen not as well for Chicago.
 

Flat Ronnie

Registered User
Feb 11, 2014
5,858
3,246
I really haven't had a chance to watch as closely as I would like this year. But, from what I've seen, let me know if this is an accurate assessment of Guentzel:

From what I've seen he's been solid. Consistent 5v5. Makes some plays, finishes some plays. However, using the first 2 months as a sample size, he doesn't seem to be the type of guy that's going to carry a team or break games open very often.

Am I wrong here? What am I missing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarrylshutzSydor

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,952
24,308
NB
I really haven't had a chance to watch as closely as I would like this year. But, from what I've seen, let me know if this is an accurate assessment of Guentzel:

From what I've seen he's been solid. Consistent 5v5. Makes some plays, finishes some plays. However, using the first 2 months as a sample size, he doesn't seem to be the type of guy that's going to carry a team or break games open very often.

Am I wrong here? What am I missing?
I don't think that's really what he was advertised as. He's more of a top tier complementary player.

I would still like to revisit Guentzel with Paul at some point. They looked really good together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flat Ronnie

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad