Jovavic
boohoo, Pens "fans", BOOHOO
Last edited by a moderator:
Likely the latter since Fabbro is a RHD
Interesting, what with Harris? Or Jiříček will be sent to Cleveland?
Probably:
Werenski, Fabbro
Provorov, Severson
Christiansen, xxx
That has potential to make 2 pairs worse
Interesting, what with Harris? Or Jiříček will be sent to Cleveland?
Probably:
Werenski, Fabbro
Provorov, Severson
Christiansen, xxx
Theoretically yes. But do not forget what's happen in the last season with Jiříček. Although... Nemec and Korchinski are in the AHL...Likely the latter since Fabbro is a RHD
Viqsi wrote he played good with Josi. So maybe we could try him with Werenski.That has potential to make 2 pairs worse
Yeah but the reason it could work with Werenski is he's a lower event defense guy. Does it have potential? Maybe. That said, taking away a low event guy from Severson and putting Provorov there again does not sound like a recipe for success.Theoretically yes. But do not forget what's happen in the last season with Jiříček. Although... Nemec and Korchinski are in the AHL...
Viqsi wrote he played good with Josi. So maybe we could try him with Werenski.
If we trade Provorov, if...Yeah but the reason it could work with Werenski is he's a lower event defense guy. Does it have potential? Maybe. That said, taking away a low event guy from Severson and putting Provorov there again does not sound like a recipe for success.
I personally see zero reason to move Provorov from pair 1 until he's potentially traded
Interesting, what with Harris? Or Jiříček will be sent to Cleveland?
Probably:
Werenski, Fabbro
Provorov, Severson
Christiansen, xxx
I think the potential is higher simply because of the existence proof shown with Josi a couple years back. I can understand some hesitation and I won't get too grumpy if Evason goes the same route, but I really do think this could work really well.Yeah but the reason it could work with Werenski is he's a lower event defense guy. Does it have potential? Maybe. That said, taking away a low event guy from Severson and putting Provorov there again does not sound like a recipe for success.
I personally see zero reason to move Provorov from pair 1 until he's potentially traded
Both of our top 4 pairs are getting good results and have some chemistry right now, so I think it makes more sense to have Fabbro take over in the 5/6/7 spots until later in the year when Provorov is dealt.
They aren't similar defensemen at all. Maybe Fabbro becomes that with opportunity but noone is paying (clearly) for maybe. They will however pay for a guy giving good results and 24+ minutes a nightGood luck with that. if the Preds can’t trade Fabro, what do you think is the likelihood of trading a large contract for a similar defenseman?
Yeah but the reason it could work with Werenski is he's a lower event defense guy. Does it have potential? Maybe. That said, taking away a low event guy from Severson and putting Provorov there again does not sound like a recipe for success.
I personally see zero reason to move Provorov from pair 1 until he's potentially traded
Good luck with that. if the Preds can’t trade Fabro, what do you think is the likelihood of trading a large contract for a similar defenseman?
my bad my bad! lol but yea lmao ive always read it like that until you just mentioned it!Today I've predominantly found out that a lot of people misspell my name. The "q" comes before the "s".