The group that wants nothing to do with Dubois says he's not a player a team wins with and they use 2 arguments:
- Dubois requested a trade, he's a quitter, a locker-room cancer
- He wasn't dominant in in the playoffs the last 2 series he played
This is funny because we are seeing a Vegas team led by Eichel vs a Florida team led by Tkachuk in the finals.
Eichel requested a trade and refused to report to the Sabres, and now he led Vegas to the finals and made them the best team in the West during the regular season.
Tkachuk told the Flames he wasn't going to re-sign with them and he was a ghost in the playoffs in previous years, and now he carried the Panthers to the playoffs and to the finals.
Clearly you missed the whole point this group was trying to put forward.
Nobody (other than Columbus fans) has a problem with Dubois asking for a trade. People are worried about him giving up on his teammates, which he undoubtedly did in Columbus.
Same thing in Winnipeg, there’s no problem with him not wanting to stay there (toxic locker room and small city). After a disappointing first season and a pretty invisible playoff performance, he went back to his career average last season and was one of their best players in the first half of the season. He was pretty bad in three of those five games against the Knights and had shift probably worse than his famous one in Columbus. In the end, no other player on that team really showed up and that blame is to be shared between all of them.
In isolation, there’s nothing wrong with Dubois not wanting to stay in those markets but if you add his Cap Breton days, this is the third time Dubois wants to move out of a market because things aren’t the way he wants them to be.
Mix that with questionable performances, and I do believe there’s cause for concern. It doesn’t mean Dubois is a bad person or a bad player, but when making an acquisition that will change your team for 8 years while spending assets, you need to question all those things. Because the second he steps on foot in that locker room, all the eyes will be on him.
No doubt that he would be one of the best forward on this team and a big center who can play on the wing will always be helpful. Some do paint him as a player that he isn’t and will be disappointed at one point in time if he ever ends up in Montreal.
I don’t believe your comparisons are fair. Or provide the adequate details to understand the context of both those situations.
Eichel was Buffalo best performer years after years. He signed an 8 year extension with one of the worst markets in the NHL. Clearly he was dedicated to make it worked but has time passed Buffalo’s management failed to fulfill their promises. Again, Sabres fans have a right to be mad at him, but he was committed to make it work. Their inability to build around him caused that situation. Add the neck surgery controversy and it’s easy to understand why that relationship soured the way it did.
Tkachuk situation is similar on some points, but the players are different. He did inform his team that he wouldn’t extend with them. With Gaudreau leaving and an aging team, it was clear the Flames window was closing. Tkachuk took the opportunity to go back to the US and facilitated a trade by signing a long term contract. He did have some disappointing showings in the playoffs but his character was never in question. He didn’t give up on his teammates on the ice. He’s clearly a leader on the ice and a glue guy.
I don’t see anyone here saying Dubois is a bad player. I do share some of the concerns about spending multiple assets to acquire and extend a player that has all that smoke around him (even though I’d trade for him). He can be a fantastic human being and a great player once his here, I just don’t understand how some can’t see whats worrisome about his situation.