Is Peter Forsberg the best forward that never scored more than 30 goals?

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
Watched some videos of Forsberg the other day where he talked about his career etc and i looked up his stats and he never scored more than 30 goals. Sure he was injured alot and rarely played all 82 games but still...
He scored exactly 30 goals twice but never more than that.

A guy like Thornton has scored 30+ goals twice aswell but he scored 36 and 37 goals when he did.
 
Last edited:

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,198
21,410
Toronto
Watched some videos of Forsberg the other day where he talked about his career etc and i looked up his stats and he never scored more than 30 goals. Sure he was injured alot and rarely played all 82 games but still...
He scored exactly 30 goals twice but never more than that.

A guy like Thornton has scored 30+ goals twice aswell but he scored 36 and 37 goals when he did.
Recent probably, but I'd say "The Pocket Rocket" most likely wins this.
 

Icebreakers

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
9,380
4,392
Eh this thread is a bit cherry picking, his career gpg amounts to about 28 goals a season. P damn close to averaging 30 a season. yeah sure he never officially scored over 30 goals but he was definitely capable. Hank Sedins gpg over his career is 15 goals. A potential hall of fame forward who averaged 15 goals a season for his career.
 

eviohh26*

Guest
I dont understand how people keep saying he was overrated. Guy was freaking beast and 1 of the best during his time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,198
21,410
Toronto
Forsberg is most definitely better than Henri Rchard :laugh:
Sure...... Thats why he has 11 rings and was voted as the 30th best player of all time in 1998. Forsberg had a better peak and may be viewed as better if he didn't break down, but a major reason he broke down was his style of play. Its an insane feat to be a top 6 player on Stanley cups 20 years apart.
 

eviohh26*

Guest
Eh this thread is a bit cherry picking, his career gpg amounts to about 28 goals a season. P damn close to averaging 30 a season. yeah sure he never officially scored over 30 goals but he was definitely capable. Hank Sedins gpg over his career is 15 goals. A potential hall of fame forward who averaged 15 goals a season for his career.

To be honest. Hank is 10x the play maker than a goal scorer.
 

ReginKarlssonLehner

Let's Win It All
May 3, 2010
40,955
11,446
Dubai Marina
I think throwing the best around is quite a bit. But he certainly top 10? People that hate on Forsberg never watched him play. Guy was a freaking force.

No one could contain him, it's true his playing style was unsustainable on the human body for multiple years but when he was on his game, he was the living embodiment of what the ultimate, true, theoretical, perfect hockey player would be/look like.

No one ive ever witnessed was as dominating, as creative, as enjoying and effective in all aspects of the game than Forsberg. I think the only 2 things he wasn't elite in was faceoffs and fighting or something lol but he still was not bad in those too.

Maybe Hasek, who i consider best player of all-time.
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,990
Brooklyn
I spent 5-10 minutes checking, and the only forwards who never scored more than 30 goals who I would take over Forsberg are Syl Apps, Henri Richard, and possibly Frank Boucher.

Henri Richard peaked when the NHL season was 70 games long. Apps and Boucher played when it was much shorter than 70 games.

So I would say that Forsberg is the best forward to play 80+ game seasons who never scored more than 30 goals. (I was kind of surprised to see that Bobby Clarke broke 30 a few times).
 

Raymones

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
1,567
205
Sweden
He might be. Forsberg was in my opinion one the greatest talents ever to come out of Sweden. One of the most complete players of the past couple of decades.
 

Horvath Broncos

Registered User
Aug 21, 2013
2,093
11
No one could contain him, it's true his playing style was unsustainable on the human body for multiple years but when he was on his game, he was the living embodiment of what the ultimate, true, theoretical, perfect hockey player would be/look like.

No one ive ever witnessed was as dominating, as creative, as enjoying and effective in all aspects of the game than Forsberg. I think the only 2 things he wasn't elite in was faceoffs and fighting or something lol but he still was not bad in those too.

Maybe Hasek, who i consider best player of all-time.

I don't know how old you are but if you have seen Forsberg you must have seen this guy Mario Lemieux play. How on god's name was Foppa more creative and more dominating than Lemieux.

I mean I loved Foppa back in the day. But this is the exact reason why he is so overrated. He is not that good.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,198
21,410
Toronto
I don't know how old you are but if you have seen Forsberg you must have seen this guy Mario Lemieux play. How on god's name was Foppa more creative and more dominating than Lemieux.
Only argument is Lemieux lack of defensive ability, but I'd easily take 94 Fedorov over Forsberg for all-around play, not as physical, but a better defensive player, goal scorer, and skater.
 

Horvath Broncos

Registered User
Aug 21, 2013
2,093
11
Only argument is Lemieux lack of defensive ability, but I'd easily take 94 Fedorov over Forsberg for all-around play, not as physical, but a better defensive player, goal scorer, and skater.


There is absolutely zero viable arguments for Foppa over Lemieux.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,198
21,410
Toronto
There is absolutely zero viable arguments for Foppa over Lemieux.
i wouldn't either, but he's saying all around play, otherwise its 99 and 66 without question. A guy like Lemieux was never a Selke level defender, its very hard to pinpoint what people mean by All-around, does it just mean good at everything or is there some off-setting balancing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Horvath Broncos

Registered User
Aug 21, 2013
2,093
11
i wouldn't either, but he's saying all around play, otherwise its 99 and 66 without question. A guy like Lemieux was never a Selke level defender, its very hard to pinpoint what people mean by All-around, does it just mean good at everything or is their some off-setting balancing.

Being great all around is way overrated in these boards when you talk about players like Lemieux whom was a super human player offensively and players like Forsberg who was "just" one of the best of his generation with great two way play. Sure Lemieux was lazy at defending but the fact of a matter was he was so good offensively that puck was in the other end most of the time. No amount of defensive play from Foppa will ever close the humongous cap between their offenses. So even all around Mario is better than Forsberg because what short comings he had defensively he more than makes up offensively.
 

johan f

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
2,442
932
Sweden
Peter's goalscoring isn't an issue. Not for his coaches anyways. Not for his teammates thru out the career. Important thing is that the TEAM scored goals and he always helped the TEAM scoring goals. He even prevented other team from scoring goals because he worked hard and was active without the puck. What his coaches expected from him was not goals but an overall game with gifted playmaking. Of course they were on his back to shoot more, but that was because they knew he could shoot better than his unselfish mind thought.

But to knock on a player of that caliber for not scoring more than 30 goals is not right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad