Tavares already got paid, he was nowhere near an 11 million dollar center come playoff time. If he really wants to win in Toronto he can take a serious discount, otherwise he can go wherever he wants. He is Toronto's Stamkos, can look good at times if he's drowning in talent but otherwise, isn't a needle mover.Re: Tavares signing for too high AAV. If he signs for too much and doesn't perform up to the billing he'll be blamed by the media and fans; if he signs for less than his perceived value it'll be a blow to all other players who will feel increased pressure to sign for less money. How to fix this problem? Maybe limit the term? Even then, franchises would rather sign generational superstars to contracts as long as possible -- imagine being able to sign McDavid to only, say, four-year contracts and have the AAV raise like 2M with each renewal (though I guess it could even out with the underperformers).
I don't think comparing Mats to John is considered disrespect. Although I'd probably rate Mats a tad higher I don't think John is far off at all. You could make a healthy argument they are the same tier player considering Mats never had a top 5 MVP finish and John has had 2 top 3Just commenting to say don't disrespect Mats he was a great player.
Mats did not play in a lower scoring era than John for the bulk of their careers.Not even close lmao, Sundin was a warrior who performed in the playoffs, Tavares does neither of those.
Sundin went ppg 4/9 playoff appearances with a worse supporting cast than JT and a lower scoring era
Tavares went ppg 1/9 playoff appearances with a better supporting cast in a higher scoring era
Tavares is a Costco Sundin at a Erewhon price.
Normally I would 100% agreeTavares already got paid, he was nowhere near an 11 million dollar center come playoff time. If he really wants to win in Toronto he can take a serious discount, otherwise he can go wherever he wants. He is Toronto's Stamkos, can look good at times if he's drowning in talent but otherwise, isn't a needle mover.
I don't think comparing Mats to John is considered disrespect. Although I'd probably rate Mats a tad higher I don't think John is far off at all. You could make a healthy argument they are the same tier player considering Mats never had a top 5 MVP finish and John has had 2 top 3
Mats did not play in a lower scoring era than John for the bulk of their careers.
You know Tavares was over a PPG and second in league scoring in 2014/15? Also 4th by PPG game in 2013/14(Broken leg at the Olympics). Tavares was at or above PPG 5 times, and missed PPG 2 other times by a single point.Mats scored 94 points at the peak of the dead puck era and was PPG otherwise. He's a clear tier above Tavares who has never been over PPG and played in a higher scoring era.