So you would feel better watching a worse team? I really don't get this line of thinking from a fan perspective. This team has invested a lot of time, money and energy to build this team yet fans want them to tear it down just two years after winning a Cup because they are so eager to start a rebuild? That's a head scratcher for me. Being a fan of any team requires having a bit of faith, and it seems like a portion of this fan base has none whatsoever.
Because a sizable amount of us think we just closed our own window and have had the benefit of a year to confim that. We may have won 2 years ago but without Pietrangelo and Tarasenko this is a completely different and much worse hockey team. The possibility of Schwartz leaving only solidifies that. It's like saying the Sharks should still try to build for a championship around Burns, Hertl, and Couture because they were in the conference final 3 years ago. Waiting only serves to put us in limbo and make what assets we do have lose value as they age.
I don't think teams need to always follow the "tear it down and rebuild" approach. And if you haven't noticed, it's far from a guarantee of success. If the team keeps trending downward after this year, then we can talk but the Blues aren't going to abandon their long term plan just because of one disappointing, injury-riddled season. You want to alienate ROR, Schenn, Parayko, Binner, and the rest of the team by waving the while flag right now? Not to mention a large portion of the fan base who aren't HF nerds, and aren't always trying to outthink Armstrong and the front office.
They don't, when your best players are entering their prime and have the skill to win, that's when you retool. That's why we retooled years ago and refocused the core around Pietrangelo, Tarasenko, and Schwartz. There comes a time, though, the options to retool around just aren't good enough to carry you. Do we think Kyrou, Thomas, and Parayko are good enough to be the focal point in a cup contending squad? I absolutely don't.
That leaves the option of trying to make it work with what we have, but what we just saw was nowhere close. You point to Montreal, but they've had good 5 on 5 numbers for years and got a highly touted young talent that provided the finishing ability they were missing all that time. We both suck at 5on5 and don't have a Caulfield waiting to join us.
Finally, rebuilds and teardowns don't guarantee success, sure. Nothing guaruntees it. But since the Red Wings the only team to win the stanley cup who didn't rebuild around or after the lockout is Boston. You basically have to get extremely lucky with your drafting and/or free agent signings to make it work. We have been selling our picks for a while now, and we knew that we would pay for it in the future, but it was worth it. If the cost of the cup was rebuilding, I'd pay it again and again. I'd have like to have more runs at it, but the drop off from the roster has been fairly drastic and I'd rather accept the truth instead of whimper into that goodnight.
Feel free to disagree with some moves he's made, but it's silly when fans act like Armstrong doesn't know what he's doing as if he somehow lucked into his current position. The team is still a business and they have to make smart business moves, and I fail to see how starting a rebuild right now is good for business.
Pretty much everyone has to have some luck to win the Stanley Cup, it's a hard trophy to win. Armstrong lucked out when O'Reilly was made available. Now he's gotten unlucky with the Tarasenko situation. It happens. Maybe it is better business to get more data until the fanbase at large is convinced that a rebuild is the best path moving forward, but as fans, we don't really have to consider what Billy in Chesterfield who watches 4 games a year thinks. I'm looking at the roster and not really seeing a good path forward otherwise, so I'd prefer to rip off the band-aid.