therealkoho
Him/Leaf/fan
Great wisdom oh wise one4th best team in the league lost to the best team by a goal in game 7. Even outscored the best team in the league 23 to 22. God they suck...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8c21/b8c2193e454ec7477208fbc20a724d12533f54f5" alt="thumbs up :thumbu: :thumbu:"
Great wisdom oh wise one4th best team in the league lost to the best team by a goal in game 7. Even outscored the best team in the league 23 to 22. God they suck...
I thought they would be shown da door after another defeat .. 6 years of defeats .. it is too much
Still waiting for that one sound argument to show why Dubas deserves another shot. Pro Dubas side is weak this off-season.
They dumped Babcock and he was owed just as much, if not more. While I'd prefer to axe both, I think it's better that Dubas isn't on the last year of his deal. Who knows what he'd do out of desperation for his job.Gents some bad news for us .. although it has not gone public yet Dubie was renewed until end of Shanny's deal for 2024/25 season at 1M per about 10 months ago .. Shanny makes 5M per .. so if MLSE wants to unload these 2 guys they will have a $18M payout to deal with .. not a lot for MLSE but da decision on Shanny/Dubie was made last summer
Those successes came many years after the years pointed out by the poster you quoted.Uhmmm you conveniently forgot to follow with back to back Stanley Cups which this team is not going to win , thats some comparison you got there bud . Dubas this , expected corsi that , this an XBox simulation team playing in the real world thinking video game stats make up for real world play .
You do realize there are 100 facets involved with this question right? It's only simplistic and stupid because you have tunnel vision.This isn't really an answerable question, because evaluating GMs exclusively by how many playoff series their team wins is simplistic and stupid.
Not sure what you mean. I think you have things backwards. The thread title literally asks a "tunnel vision" question, and my post identifies that there are more "facets" that need to be considered than exclusively the one mentioned in the title.You do realize there are 100 facets involved with this question right? It's only simplistic and stupid because you have tunnel vision.
You do realize there are 100 facets involved with this question right? It's only simplistic and stupid because you have tunnel vision.
14 years of bad with Stamkos and Hedman. just pointing that out for Leafs fans who think winning happens just because you have some good players.Uhmmm you conveniently forgot to follow with back to back Stanley Cups which this team is not going to win , thats some comparison you got there bud . Dubas this , expected corsi that , this an XBox simulation team playing in the real world thinking video game stats make up for real world play .
I think they are taking turns exposing themselves , last time I ripped on him it was much more than 6 but several were PM 's , they do seem to be much quieter in general .In their defense there is maybe only 6 of them left.
Ok I'll clarify by expanding my statement for you ok? In the 9 seasons since the last 2 DNQ's in the OP the Lightning have failed to qualify once and been booted after the first round twice . Six times they have been to at least the conference final and three times they have been to the Cup final losing once , the final season is this current playoff where they are in the conference final so far . Hardly a comparisson to the Leafs who in the same time period have five first round exits , one play in loss =DNQ and three regular DNQ . Now does it seem wise to compare those two records as being anywhere close to equals ?14 years of bad with Stamkos and Hedman. just pointing that out for Leafs fans who think winning happens just because you have some good players.
I love how its the 4th best (regular season) team when we're describing Toronto, yet you use best team to describe Tampa (8th best in regular season).4th best team in the league lost to the best team by a goal in game 7. Even outscored the best team in the league 23 to 22. God they suck...
Leafs also had 2 games to close it out and once again couldn't. TB was just heating upI love how its the 4th best (regular season) team when we're describing Toronto, yet you use best team to describe Tampa (8th best in regular season).
So which is it? Either they choked against a lower seeded team, or the team thats never made it outta the 1st round lost to the 2x defending champs. You can't have your cake and eat it too
If you exclude the part where they win series they are virtually identical.Ok I'll clarify by expanding my statement for you ok? In the 9 seasons since the last 2 DNQ's in the OP the Lightning have failed to qualify once and been booted after the first round twice . Six times they have been to at least the conference final and three times they have been to the Cup final losing once , the final season is this current playoff where they are in the conference final so far . Hardly a comparisson to the Leafs who in the same time period have five first round exits , one play in loss =DNQ and three regular DNQ . Now does it seem wise to compare those two records as being anywhere close to equals ?
It was renamed “All For Nothing”When does the All Or Nothing Part 6 come out?
They’ve always had weak arguments, but, yeah, this year, it’s been really bad. Lol.Still waiting for that one sound argument to show why Dubas deserves another shot. Pro Dubas side is weak this off-season.
Is this from your imaginary friend again?Gents some bad news for us .. although it has not gone public yet Dubie was renewed until end of Shanny's deal for 2024/25 season at 1M per about 10 months ago .. Shanny makes 5M per .. so if MLSE wants to unload these 2 guys they will have a $18M payout to deal with .. not a lot for MLSE but da decision on Shanny/Dubie was made last summer
Yeah my bad, anyway playoffs are a crap shoot, regular season a truer sample of the teams ability. Most years at a least 1 of the top 4 teams during the regular season are pegged as Cup favourites. The regular season means a lot. Playoffs, they say anything can happen for a reason.I love how its the 4th best (regular season) team when we're describing Toronto, yet you use best team to describe Tampa (8th best in regular season).
So which is it? Either they choked against a lower seeded team, or the team thats never made it outta the 1st round lost to the 2x defending champs. You can't have your cake and eat it too
Yeah my bad, anyway playoffs are a crap shoot, regular season a truer sample of the teams ability. Most years at a least 1 of the top 4 teams during the regular season are pegged as Cup favourites. The regular season means a lot. Playoffs, they say anything can happen for a reason.
Bc they ran out of reasons, hahahaThey’ve always had weak arguments, but, yeah, this year, it’s been really bad. Lol.
I don't know, I can still point to Vas.If you exclude the part where they win series they are virtually identical.![]()
This seems like one of those “not sure if serious” posts.Yeah my bad, anyway playoffs are a crap shoot, regular season a truer sample of the teams ability. Most years at a least 1 of the top 4 teams during the regular season are pegged as Cup favourites. The regular season means a lot. Playoffs, they say anything can happen for a reason.