Pre-Game Talk: Hot Rails to Hell - Oilers v Devils - Thurs @ 5:30

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
48,553
62,796
Islands in the stream.
Vegas can do this because they are near or at the top of best cities to play in. We have to overpay most players to play here.
I can't describe how dumb our species has become if Desert environments devoid of water and unfit for human habitation are described as the best places to be.

Guess what happens when brownouts and outages get more severe, or water supply gets more dire?

Read about the hell outside in Vegas


Edmonton and Alberta will be one of the best places to be.

It wasn't a decade ago when I could buy houses if I wanted to in Cities in Arizona for 50-70K. It'll happen again. Not the same prices but an immense crash.
 
Last edited:

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
37,565
18,501
We are still in the lingering stress of that awful start to the season

If this were last year, a three game losing streak wouldn't be that big a deal

We are making a lot of the goaltending but its not like Skinner was bad last game.

Ultimately, if we are no longer that bad team from the start of the year, we should make the playoffs.

Also I do think that at some time, we will see a trade that will help the team. The Oilers are a flaky team but it should stabilize
 

Mav3rick07

Registered User
Jul 28, 2007
11,850
11,439
Moneypuck still has our playoff odds at 64 percent. That seems awfully generous ?
 

nexttothemoon

and again...
Jan 30, 2010
30,255
18,196
Northern AB
Of these 3 pre-Christmas road games... this Jersey game is the most winnable as the Devils goalies are 30th in the NHL in sv pct... almost as bad as the Oilers who are 31st.

I expect the Oilers to play this game hard out because they don't want to shit the bed again and have a 4 game losing streak going into the Rangers building afterwards where they'll face either Shesterkin (elite) or Quick (playing out of his mind this year). Rags are easily one of the best teams in the NHL as well right now so small miracle to win that game.

This streak of losing could easily get out of hand and bury this team.

This is pretty much a must win game at this stage... points-wise in the standings maybe only being out by 7 pts from a wildcard spot with 2 games in hand may not seem so bad... but this team knows it can get into deeply negative territory in terms of team psyche and I think things can easily spiral if they don't make a statement game soon.

They need to put up a game like they played during that 8 game winning streak... ie get their shit together both offensively and defensively and then hopefully Pickard can be stable enough in net to not deflate the team and allow them to play a solid 60 minutes of hard, disciplined hockey.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Oilhawks

ThePhoenixx

Registered User
Aug 7, 2005
9,574
6,288
How many guys on this board legitimately would have called off the experiment, waived Brown after game 9 and moved on. I haven't been too hard on Holland other than not being able to get a good goalie but this is absolutely a fireable offense on its own. No words to describe how big this avoidable mistake was.
I Posted it here. Repeatedly. Pls waive him before he hits ten.

I was not the only one.
 

Juxta Position

Registered User
Jul 2, 2006
2,322
1,896
Agree for the most part BUT: Holland had a Get Out Of Jail Free card literally fall in his lap like manna from heaven when Brown went down with a groin injury on his 9th game. He could and should have sent him to Bako for a conditioning stint upon his return and if he didn't work out there, waive him telling him he can get his game in order down there rather than take a chance with nearly 5% of next years cap riding on the hope that he would somehow find his game here.

This I totally agree with. it was evident that Brown was not remotely up to speed after missing a full season, and he had the opportunity to essentially get a redo with the signing by assigning him to Bako, now they are on the hook for that money.

like I stated before it was a gamble, everyone knew how much of gamble it was, and although I like the idea that he was looking to improve the team in what are essentially creative ways when there was almost zero room under the cap, the gamble very obviously has not paid off.

Holland did have the opportunity to fix that mistake, and didn't. that's what people should be upset about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 Mins 4 Ftg

94 Oil Drops

SKINNER(S!)
Sep 19, 2019
5,182
8,017
Alberta
Well even if we lose tonight, I can take some comfort in knowing that I have 11 days off work starting tomorrow. Christmas would bring a smile to may face even if the Oilers were to lose every game in December. Thankfully, there's more to life than hockey. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: RegDunlop and Skar

Juxta Position

Registered User
Jul 2, 2006
2,322
1,896
Yes however you are only telling half the story, while chastising “Monday Morning QBs” to settle down. The signing hasn’t worked out, that is without argument.

But you aren’t also commenting on Browne being signed after a serious injury that resulted in nearly an entire season lost, without any performance standards in a contract with a significant salary bonus that was pushed to next year further impacting a broken salary cap structure. I think it’s the latter two aspects of the signing that coupled with his crap performance has folks wound up (and probably rightly so).

It’s in that more fulsome accounting of the situation people are voicing displeasure.

I'm not telling half the story. When I say Brown's and Hyman's careers prior to signing in Edmonton are very similar that includes the injuries. Hyman was coming off multiple knee injuries as well in which he missed significant time over 2 different seasons. there were very real questions about his knees long term before signing in Edmonton, and I remember a lot of people around here saying it was a bad signing due to those injury factors.

All the same question marks were surrounding Hyman that were surrounding Brown, Hyman has worked out, Brown has not.

Yes Brown has flopped, and flopped hard, but not every signing can be Zach Hyman. Holland has taken some risks no doubt, some have worked some have failed spectacularly, but I'm not going to be flinging myself off a ledge every time a singing or trade doesn't work out.

I like the fact that the GM is at least trying to improve the team, instead going back to the Captain Dither days of a Steve Tambellini.

I do agree, that he has not handled the situation well when he had an "out" essentially fall in his lap, like 5 Mins 4 Ftg pointed out in another post, and Holland could've essentially wiped the slate clean, and did not. To me that's the frustrating aspect of this situation, not the signing itself.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,492
14,510
Somewhere on Uranus
How many guys on this board legitimately would have called off the experiment, waived Brown after game 9 and moved on. I haven't been too hard on Holland other than not being able to get a good goalie but this is absolutely a fireable offense on its own. No words to describe how big this avoidable mistake was.
I would have sent him down and brought a kid up
 

brentashton

Registered User
Jan 21, 2018
14,697
21,290
I'm not telling half the story. When I say Brown's and Hyman's careers prior to signing in Edmonton are very similar that includes the injuries. Hyman was coming off multiple knee injuries as well in which he missed significant time over 2 different seasons. there were very real questions about his knees long term before signing in Edmonton, and I remember a lot of people around here saying it was a bad signing due to those injury factors.

All the same question marks were surrounding Hyman that were surrounding Brown, Hyman has worked out, Brown has not.

Yes Brown has flopped, and flopped hard, but not every signing can be Zach Hyman. Holland has taken some risks no doubt, some have worked some have failed spectacularly, but I'm not going to be flinging myself off a ledge every time a singing or trade doesn't work out.

I like the fact that the GM is at least trying to improve the team, instead going back to the Captain Dither days of a Steve Tambellini.

I do agree, that he has not handled the situation well when he had an "out" essentially fall in his lap, like 5 Mins 4 Ftg pointed out in another post, and Holland could've essentially wiped the slate clean, and did not. To me that's the frustrating aspect of this situation, not the signing itself.
Yes. I like GMs who make moves and with that goes an element of risk. There is also the concept of risk management that has to play a part in every decision and operational action. Ken failed in this with his contract offer and structure and then not pulling the trigger on the one exit option he had when things were soured so quickly.

You never mentioned these aspects in your initial post, thus why I say you didn’t tell the entire story. These two parts are extremely important in the whole appreciation of the situation.

Nonetheless I think we both agree it’s a crappy spot they now are in. Let’s hope they play the same way they did against NYI and get the stops they need. Cheers Juxta.
 

Juxta Position

Registered User
Jul 2, 2006
2,322
1,896
Yes. I like GMs who make moves and with that goes an element of risk. There is also the concept of risk management that has to play a part in every decision and operational action. Ken failed in this with his contract offer and structure and then not pulling the trigger on the one exit option he had when things were soured so quickly.

You never mentioned these aspects in your initial post, thus why I say you didn’t tell the entire story. These two parts are extremely important in the whole appreciation of the situation.

Nonetheless I think we both agree it’s a crappy spot they now are in. Let’s hope they play the same way they did against NYI and get the stops they need. Cheers Juxta.

You're right, I did fail to mention that, I assumed it went without saying, that being said when debating a topic all factors should have been included in the discussion.

And yes it a very crappy situation...and I also think, as most people do, that Holland is not the right person to try and fix this situation, and that a change of perspective is sorely needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 Mins 4 Ftg
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad