Midas0
Only the best Scouts
and Hockeystreams just ****ing bugged out/froze/stopped working again.
edit: and it's back! missed the end of the 1st period because of it.
edit: and it's back! missed the end of the 1st period because of it.
and Hockeystreams just ****ing bugged out/froze/stopped working again.
edit: and it's back! missed the end of the 1st period because of it.
Yes, I definitely don't care the slightest bit about the broadcast holders who continually screw over consumers. The guys who play a professional sport for a short period of their life, I care about them. The league that operates and provides entertainment to me for 9 months a year, I also care about.
it's not really important but if you want to know the math
best GCL stream is 4.5mbs, bluray is typically about 40mbps, so about 8x more info
4k is exactly 4times the pixels of 1080p
remember quality is measured by bit rate, not resolution. blu ray is very high quality because of it's bit rateYou're confused as to what resolution is.
I showed you the exact resoultion of 1080p, which is 1920 X 1080. 4K is double that, quadrupled it would be 7680 X 4320.
Mbps is the data transfer rate and is very different from resolution.
remember quality is measured by bit rate, not resolution. blu ray is very high quality because of it's bit rate
as for resolution of 4k, what's so hard about understanding that it has 4 times the pixels as 1080p?
1920x1080p=2.1 megapixels
3840x2160=8.3 megapixels
What a ridiculous argument. If you are going to make a stand on moral grounds, it's best to be batting over .500...nomsayin?
I also scoff at the "Pro athlete has a limited career to earn money to last a lifetime" arguments.
So what....go get a real job like everybody else. Guys like Phil Esposito had summer jobs.
I don't know, maybe you can try harder to explain because I don't know what you're talking about.
1080 hd has 1920 pixels hotizontally and 1080 pixels vertically.
4k has exactly double the amount of pixels vertically and horizontally and the industry standard and basic photographic/video application of the concept of resolution would indicate that the resolution is double, not quadruple.
I work professionally in video broadcasting and almost never refer to bit rate, especially when talking about picture quality.
It's not about morals. I steal plenty of TV shows and movies.
I'm just trying to understand why someone who is clearly a fan of the NHL and players would chose a service that rips off said league and players when the NHL offers the exact same service (when combined with unblock-us).
I'm just trying to get some clarification, not trying to judge.
I definitely have no clue as to what you're saying about batting .500.
Not exactly the same service, hockeystreams offers more than just the NHL, including international hockey. Which is the main reason i chose to go with them for a month to try it out.
and Hockeystreams just ****ing bugged out/froze/stopped working again.
edit: and it's back! missed the end of the 1st period because of it.
It's not about morals. I steal plenty of TV shows and movies.
I'm just trying to understand why someone who is clearly a fan of the NHL and players would chose a service that rips off said league and players when the NHL offers the exact same service (when combined with unblock-us).
I'm just trying to get some clarification, not trying to judge.
I definitely have no clue as to what you're saying about batting .500.
Not only that, but the GCL service is better. The layout is better, the mobile experience is better, the PVR functions are better....all for $10 less a year.
And blackouts can be circumvented for free.
Slightly off-topic: is there anything like Hockeystreams for baseball?
Not only that, but the GCL service is better. The layout is better, the mobile experience is better, the PVR functions are better....all for $10 less a year.
And blackouts can be circumvented for free.
AHL and OHL seal the deal for me. I don't really care about the layout, the mobile experience (I either watch it on my desktop or hook my laptop up to my TV with an HDMI cable), and never use the PVR functions. If all you want to do is watch hockey and don't care about all the extras, then HS is better than GCL.
How are you getting it for 10$ less? It was 149$ at the start of the year and it just recently dropped to 99$..
I have mixed feelings about Hockeystreams. It's nice to be able to watch all the AHL, OHL, and NHL games, but the HD stream (3200kbps) is so choppy and laggy for me that I have to switch to the low quality stream every time. Hockeystreams has been good lately, but earlier on in the season there were many hiccups like the website crashing, streams going dead, etc.
Last season I had NHL-GCL, and the whole "black-out" thing pissed me off beyond belief. I don't own a television, so I can "tune-in" on TSN/CBC on a whim. And the the GCL stream has like a 30 second delay which means I couldn't follow the game on twitter/hfboards because I'd read about things before they happened on screen. The 30 second delay kind of ruins the whole experience... you're not watching a "live" game anymore, it's essentially a "recording" at that point.
I'm not sure what I'll do next year.
Also I don't need AHL or OHL. I just read the prospects thread here and use what other people say to develop extremely firm opinions on certain prospects, then I use those to declare with absolute certainty that certain guys are busts, or that they are can't miss players. Its not perfect but its enough to get into petty arguments on here which is great.