BruinLVGA
Just got me a Beretta 92XI Squalo!
Not saying that they couldn't medal again but saying that they are on par with Finland is dishonest.
Where did I say they were on par with Finland???????????
Not saying that they couldn't medal again but saying that they are on par with Finland is dishonest.
Where did I say they were on par with Finland???????????
Tier 2 with CZE-FIN-SUI-SVK - perennial QF spots expected, potential annual medalists. one could argue for either or both of SUI/SVK to drop out of this tier - but it's not a surprise if any of these teams go far in a tournament. Switzerland and Slovakia won silvers in the past five years
No way SUI and SVK are in the same tier as CZE and FIN. How many quarterfinal appearances do respective teams have in last 5 years in both Olympics and WHC? The gap is very noticeable.
These jinx posts are beautiful. Just beat Canada. How's that for a gap?
(Finland will beat us soundly though: we will be tired physically and mentally, after beating Canada. Then everyone will feel vindicated, don't worry...)
No way SUI and SVK are in the same tier as CZE and FIN. How many quarterfinal appearances do respective teams have in last 5 years in both Olympics and WHC? The gap is very noticeable.
Canada #1 AINEC. Lol at the guy saying Finland will be better by 2022, for every 1 superstar from other countries in the world, there are 2-3 Canadian ones. Canada's best athletes play hockey and not much else, no other countries in terms of size can really compete with that.
So what is your view on swiss position? Definition is about winning OGs or World cup. Tier two is about not being surprised when team goes far. We might argue if CZ should be there under this circumstances. But Switzerland going far in OGs would be definetely surprise. You might have good prospects comming but Finnland is again on another level in this aspect. Both CZ and Finnland make WhC QF on regular basis which still looks as an issue for Switzerland.
Based on current rosters (best on best), place each nation into a tier.
So the first tier would be the elite teams that have a chance to win the Olympics or World Cup year in and year out.
Next would be the teams that may contend and it would not be a surprise if they go far in a tournament.
The third are the dark horse teams that never win but are still somewhat competitive.
The fourth are the best teams that may possibly be relegated and are never a real threat.
The fifth consists of the bottom feeders year in and year out
ONLY USE TEAMS IN THIS YEAR'S IIHF CHAMPIONSHIP
My list:
Tier 1
1.Canada
2. USA
3. Sweden
4. Russia
Tier 2
5. Finland
6. Czech Republic
Tier 3
7. Slovakia
8. Switzerland
9. France
Tier 4
10. Germany
11. Denmark
12. Norway
13. Latvia
Tier 5
14. Belarus
15. Slovenia
16. Italy
NOTE:
* France for me has bolted up into tier 3. They have some legitimate players now, play hard against the big teams and have lately proven themselves to have upset abilities
*Slovakia is no longer a tier 2 team.
*Is Russia still a tier one team? This selection may be based on the fumes of their greatness past.
...and Switzerland ends the round robin phase in second place in the group. Points in all 7 games, 5 victories including vs Canada and the Czech Republic... How about that?![]()
Its good. So as if Hirschier is product of system, not just of individual effort, it is also very good sign. Your WHC preformance is so far quite immpressive, especially when you have almost just NLA guys there. So I hope half of that team will go overseas or to KHL after the WHC. Otherwise I dont see reason why they would still stay in NLA. Thats actually one of the biggest difference between SUI and for example CZ and Finnland. These nations have around 50-60 guys in foreign top leagues compare to Switzerland (20 NHL/AHL together?).
Thank you.![]()
If you are truly interested, I can also tell you why I think that there weren't any Swiss drafted players until 20 years ago or so.
In any case, yeah I frankly believe that the development of young talent has progressed substantially in the last 20 years. Talents of Hischier's level don't happen for us, so yeah he is very special, but I think that there will be a small but steady stream of young players coming to the NHL for the time coming. Not to the level of the major nations, but not zero either.
You are talking in some blury tone for meSo what you expect in terms of drafted players? 5 annual? I might even talked to you about that players abroad before. But what is the reason behind it? Are these guys sure that KHL wouldnt make them better?
I am asking about drafted players specifically because I know that Switzerland has been rising since lets say 90s and lot of people predicted you to be somewhere around the top even in early 00s. Then it somehow got frost and you didnt bring so many results until that silver medal. So I am wondering whether something change in swiss hockey (I know you were heavilly NA oriented, maybe this?) that makes you to have such a positive predictions now.