Hockey Cards - Part III

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Rorschach

Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Oct 9, 2006
11,470
2,038
Los Angeles
Damn this is a lot of denial.
Oh well, it is what it is. I can’t change the mind of a stranger on a hockey forum.

"not a homer"
Are you sure? How can you be so sure?

If McDavid quit hockey today, you think he has a GOAT resume as a center with 0 Cups and (since 2017, his first successful season) other guys beating him for Art Ross (3x times), Hart (5x times, 5 different guys no less!)...that doesn't scream dominance to me as a scoring center. How can he be GOAT of all time when he's not even GOAT season to season?

Sounds like a severe case of recency bias to me.

Kind of glad the bedard cycle is gone now, hopefully prices wont be so comically high now for this crop.

The premium for Celebrini should be interesting to see.
 

CutOnDime97

Too Showman
Mar 29, 2008
15,615
9,812
No need to define what proves a top 100 player. It's already assumed he appears to have a top 100 player resume. But the GOATs already have much higher criteria. The big four all have huge resumes and are known outside of hockey.
Are we arguing that he's at the level of the big 4 or in the same tier as Evgeni Malkin??
 

Craig Ludwig

Registered User
Jun 16, 2005
684
786
It’s pretty easy to explain. You’re newly rich, maybe from crypto or some other investment. You buy cards of players you know.

In fact, Vintage cards are so poorly printed, unless they’re super high grade or pre-war, there’s little to generate interest. One of the cards on that list is a game worn jersey shield 1/1 autographed by Wayne Gretzky.

I remember one year I had a windfall of well over $50k and I blew 90% of that on hockey cases. It never once occurred to me to buy a vintage card. Why? My first collecting was coins. And like coin collecting, it’s dying and the majority of collecting is done by guys born 70s or earlier. With all the hype around modern players with tons of video on YT and games on TV, and the fact the early 90s being the most exciting era of hockey ever, the card collecting base is under 50.
Yeah I agree to an extent. But it's a lot easier to lose money in all these new cards if you hold on to them, as opposed to simply flipping them (See Lafreniere, Kaprizov and hundreds more). And TBH, breaking cases for the most part yields much less than what you put in, it's basically like buying scratch tickets hoping you hit a big one, or playing slot machines. We see the fake You Tube videos of an awesome 1/1 find, yet we don't see the thousand other breaks of simple garbage and a waste of a thousand bucks. Vintage hockey are for holding on to long term and making steady long term growth, basically enjoying them (Although Baseball Vintage is a much better investment). To each their own, I guess I'm more of the thought of buying Berkshire Hathaway stock as opposed to Crypto.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad