GDT: HFBoards GDT | 10/26/15

[Blitzkrieg365]

It's a delay of game.

When someone accidentally fires a puck over the glass, even if it wasn't on purpose, its delay of game.

You give someone a high stick, even if it's not on purpose, its still a penalty.

This isn't the case when it comes to net being dislodged from its moorings.

Rule 78. Goals

78.5 Disallowed Goals
(x)"When the net becomes displaced accidentally. The goal frame is considered to be displaced if either or both goal pegs are no longer in their respective holes in the ice, or the net has come completely off one or both pegs, prior to or as the puck enters the goal."

 

[Puckstop40]

The net didn't just "come off". It dislodged as a result of Andersen pushing it off. I can't say for sure it was intentional, but I don't think using the post for leverage is standard practice.

The net came off rather easily. Not sure it was fully on in the first place.

 

[cneely]

You might want to check the rules. You're wrong. The net coming off is not an automatic penalty. I understand you're upset, but you're just making **** up now.

If a defending player pushes it off and it appears it may have been intentional then yes, it's a penalty.

 

[Il Stugotz]

Wow brutal call, Kane had that under certain possession.

Hybrid icing sucks

 

[McDeathbyCheerios*]

If a goalie pushes the net off the pegs like that and as a result a goal is called off. The player should be allowed a penalty shot

 

[SnowblindNYR]

For trying to play his position?

If a player shoots the puck out over the glass accidentally he gets a penalty, why not a goalie knocking the net off accidentally?

 

[Sojourn]

If a defending player pushes it off and it appears it may have been intentional then yes, it's a penalty.

You should read what he said. He's suggesting it's automatic, with no subjectivity at all. He's wrong.

 

[kingsholygrail]

They did show a replay where the net was coming off before the guy even received the pass.

 

[Sojourn]

If a player shoots the puck out over the glass accidentally he gets a penalty, why not a goalie knocking the net off accidentally?

Because those aren't the rules?

 

[featherhawk]

The net came off rather easily. Not sure it was fully on in the first place.

then suspend/fine the officials for not doing there job then....

anderson knew exactly what he was doing

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

Regardless of how this ends, Ducks proved it's not hopeless and that they have not quit on Boudreau.

 

[cneely]

The net came off rather easily. Not sure it was fully on in the first place.

I think when he slid across to his left he jammed his skate against it and knocked it loose. Then when he pushed off on it it came completely off.

 

[Il Stugotz]

There's no reason not to push off the posts as hard as possible to try to dislodge them.

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

They did show a replay where the net was coming off before the guy even received the pass.

Don't worry letting them think differently is more hilarious for me.

 

[featherhawk]

Penalizing a goaltender for trying to make a save is not good game management.

well then we will see this becoming more and more common then.....anderson knew what he was doing and that was bailing his defence and him out from being beat

 

[kingsholygrail]

There's no reason not to push off the posts as hard as possible to try to dislodge them.

There is the ref decides to allow the goal.

 

[cneely]

You should read what he said. He's suggesting it's automatic, with no subjectivity at all. He's wrong.

I agree. That's why I specified intentionally.
Can't say for certain that wasn't intentional though.

 

[SnowblindNYR]

Because those aren't the rules?

Well if they're not it should be rules. Complete ******** that he can do that. (Obviously shouldn't get a penalty if he's pushed into the net knocking it off).

 

[Quality Oil]

You should read what he said. He's suggesting it's automatic, with no subjectivity at all. He's wrong.

Do you think that in this scenario a penalty could be assessed, based on the merit that a clear goal was disallowed due to Andersen's actions - intentional or not? That would have been a pretty special save for Andersen to have made otherwise.

 

[Sojourn]

well then we will see this becoming more and more common then.....anderson knew what he was doing and that was bailing his defence and him out from being beat

Andersen was just trying to make a save, dude.

 

[kingsholygrail]

All too easy.

 

[Wolfpuck]

Toews!

 

[Quality Oil]

What a snipe!

 

[Del Preston]

Ducks shut out again. Wow.

 

[Godlike13]

Justice