GDT: HFBoards GDT | 10/25/15

[CorgisPer60]

Exactly - Looking at that overhead view only shows you that by every ounce of human experience it was in, but in the behind McDavid view you could actually see it.

Kings are the luckiest *******.

Only looks like it, but from that angle, any elevation of that puck from the ice will result in seeing white between the goal line and the puck. Quick made a hell of a save and made it look like he saved it before it crossed the line.

 

[Claude28Giroux]

Doughty celebrating like he just won the cup. What a scrub.

yea doughty what a scrub

 

[Atas2000]

My hate for LA just grew bigger. Anothter cheater point for Quick too.

 

[hisgirlfriday]

Why can't there be a tiny camera in the goal post at the red line level? That would address stuff like this I would think. I remember Crosby losing out on a goal against the Blues last year in a similar scenario where logic dictated he had a goal but the angles of the replay just couldn't let you see it.

 

[Apoplectic Habs Fan]

If you cant use logic to call that a goal, stop being bush league and invest in proper technology

NHL stupidity

 

[Vamos Rafa]

lol Kings win.

 

[Samuel Culper III]

Obviously a goal but really no way to reverse the call in accordance with the established criteria. Sucks because it's really clearly a goal when looked at with the zoom, but because you can't see the puck it's impossible to change the original call. Tough break.

 

[Aceonfire*]

Good job NHL. Let's watch some more ****** low scoring hockey.

That Reffing was an absolute embarrassment.

 

[Old Boys Club]

Video review is inconclusive i get that, but how can the ref call that no goal when he sees Quick's glove clearly over the line?

 

[Atas2000]

There's nothing inconclusive about it - logic should play a ****ing role. Puck is in the glove - glove is in the net. It's a damn goal.

The NHL is ****ing stupid sometimes.

You could even see the puck through the mesh in the glove. It was in. But it was LA I guess.

 

[insider]

"Call on the ice stands"

...but the referee first pointed to the back of the net? That was the call on the ice, no?

 

[Alwalys]

good call, the glove was not all the way over the line and people who say so need to have their eyes checked.

 

[Reclamation Project]

Doughty celebrating like he just won the cup. What a scrub.

He would know.

#tworings

 

[Vamos Rafa]

Doughty celebrating like he just won the cup. What a scrub.

Like this?

Or like this?

 

[CorgisPer60]

Video review is inconclusive i get that, but how can the ref call that no goal when he sees Quick's glove clearly over the line?

The Refs don't get the benefit of instant replay when calling the game at game speed.

 

[MessierII]

good call, the glove was not all the way over the line and people who say so need to have their eyes checked.

From the front angle you distinctly see the puck cross it was a goal. Lucky break for LA.

 

[SnowblindNYR]

I don't like the Kings, but that play is NEVER called a goal. There was no conclusive evidence, logic or not. Either change the rule or this will continue happening. But as it stands now that was a good call.

 

[Aceonfire*]

It's a ****ing goal.

 

[SniperHF]

There's a thread for the last call, games are over so this thread is closed.