How is this even a discussion?Even though his contract may hurt the team now I have no regrets. He's more than earned it.
As far as I'm concerned, Henrik is the best goalie the Rangers have ever had and the only Ranger goalie that I consider the best goalie of his time during my hockey watching career, and I go back to Giacomin. Even though his contract may hurt the team now I have no regrets. He's more than earned it.
Fleury isn’t far behind and playing on a better team. Unfortunately, I think he’ll retire with more W’s than Henrik.
Fleury isn’t far behind and playing on a better team. Unfortunately, I think he’ll retire with more W’s than Henrik.
Depending on how you define "top three". But, yes.Unfortunately, that's the downside of goalie milestones --- they can be very dependent on things that are out of a goalie's control.
In Fleury's case, he went from a stacked Pittsburgh team to a stacked Las Vegas team. There's not a huge sample size of what he'd look like playing on a poor team.
In Lundqvist's case, his decision to remain with the Rangers will probably end up costing him quite a few wins. He never enjoyed a scenario where the team around him made up the difference when he was no longer at his very best. If he does to a top team, that doesn't require him to have to be Superman, he's probably doing just fine.
At the end of the day, the top three goalies in wins will all be French-Canadian guys. And it will happen not because there's some kind of secret sauce, but because their careers happen happened to follow a most fortuitous path --- either be design, or simply by good fortune.
The most overrated goalie of the generation to boot ...Fleury isn’t far behind and playing on a better team. Unfortunately, I think he’ll retire with more W’s than Henrik.
He still has it. The stamina just isn’t there anymore. But what can one expect? It’s natural.The Lundqvist is Done crowd being awfully quiet lately...
Unfortunately, that's the downside of goalie milestones --- they can be very dependent on things that are out of a goalie's control.
In Fleury's case, he went from a stacked Pittsburgh team to a stacked Las Vegas team. There's not a huge sample size of what he'd look like playing on a poor team.
In Lundqvist's case, his decision to remain with the Rangers will probably end up costing him quite a few wins. He never enjoyed a scenario where the team around him made up the difference when he was no longer at his very best. If he does to a top team, that doesn't require him to have to be Superman, he's probably doing just fine.
At the end of the day, the top three goalies in wins will all be French-Canadian guys. And it will happen not because there's some kind of secret sauce, but because their careers happen happened to follow a most fortuitous path --- either be design, or simply by good fortune.
Fischler was an absolute mess. Guy predicted the Rangers going to the Finals every single season.
The most overrated goalie of the generation to boot ...