Proposal: Hartnell + Milano for #4/5 RH DFD
- Thread starter Cowumbus
- Start date
Postma from the Jets would be avilable and would be a perfect fit on the bottom pairing. He's faired well in his games with WPG, just hard for him to crack the lineup with Buff, Myers and Trouba on the right side. $850 K salary. No idea what the return would be, but it wouldnt be significant.
hallhopkinseberle
Registered User
Yeah that's definitely not happening. Bieksa + 3rd/4th for Hartnell could work if we don't find a better LW and are able to dump Stoner/Despres.
Last edited:
WhatTheDuck
9 - 20 - 8
Even if we were willing to take on Hartnell, Manson would be one of the last guys we'd move, his contract is terrific.
Bieksa is the only D who makes sense here from an Anaheim standpoint.
I bet you would... as soon as any CBJ fan see's Bjorkstrand its going to be no and either the one proposing accepts it or an arguement starts
OldAsianSharksFan
More 1OV picks please
GeauxPreds
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2013
- 1,385
- 9
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
We have Harrington/Prout/Goloubef/Kukan for that #6 spot. Don't need to trade away Milano and Hartnell for someone to fill that spot.
Gaunce4gm
Trusted Hockey Man
Cody Franson from Buffalo?
He's not great, but if its just third pair, that he can do. Also has only 1 year left on his deal, I'm gonna assume CBJ would like that. RHD
Sabres have the $ to take Hartnell now that Stamwatch is over, should be extremely interested in Milano as well. Hartnell can plug into line 2 or 3 wing and bump Gionta down to line 4 where he belongs. Milano upside is obvious. Worth taking on Hartnell's 3 years for Milano, imo
Would CBJ really consider Franson for Hartnell + Milano? Obviously I know Hartnell's contract is the negative value here, but even so, that seems a bit... lopsided.
He's not great, but if its just third pair, that he can do. Also has only 1 year left on his deal, I'm gonna assume CBJ would like that. RHD
Sabres have the $ to take Hartnell now that Stamwatch is over, should be extremely interested in Milano as well. Hartnell can plug into line 2 or 3 wing and bump Gionta down to line 4 where he belongs. Milano upside is obvious. Worth taking on Hartnell's 3 years for Milano, imo
Would CBJ really consider Franson for Hartnell + Milano? Obviously I know Hartnell's contract is the negative value here, but even so, that seems a bit... lopsided.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Why?
Seriously, why?
This only makes sense to me if we're trying to trade Savard for a premium return given the current state of the market. Otherwise, why bother? We'd be overpaying for a low quality asset.
Seriously, why?
This only makes sense to me if we're trying to trade Savard for a premium return given the current state of the market. Otherwise, why bother? We'd be overpaying for a low quality asset.
No way. While I'd love to have Hartnell on the Preds, his NTC is a deal breaker. He would automatically have to be protected in the expansion draft. It isn't worth losing Ellis or Smith, because you have to waste a protection spot for Hartnell.
We dont NEEEED a RHD to play on the right side. For all we know it could be
Murray-Jones
Johnson-Savard
Werenski-Kukan
We all get lost in the RHD vs LHD but good players can play both, just like wingers. Obviously some are better on certain sides, but good players are effective on both sides.
Murray-Jones
Johnson-Savard
Werenski-Kukan
We all get lost in the RHD vs LHD but good players can play both, just like wingers. Obviously some are better on certain sides, but good players are effective on both sides.
There's absolutely no point in this. Werenski should be a player who makes his partner better or at least is on par with him, not the other way around. And a dman who'd be good enough to help Werenski would be seriously wasted on 3rd pair.
