Ranger Ric
Registered User
- Oct 26, 2015
- 1,766
- 2,889
After following the Pack all season including the first two rounds of the playoffs I missed the last round because of a previously scheduled trip to Europe with my wife. Thanks for Rodolfo for posting the game highlights and to those of you who watched and provided commentary on the boards so I could follow from overseas.
While I was away Arthur Staple of the Athletic had a three part Q&A on the Rangers focusing mostly on coaching. In one of the questions, Staple delved into the Pack. I thought his comments were worth bringing to your attention.
The first comment dealt with the coach. I don't think Staple has written one article this year on the Pack and any information he is getting is very likely very team sources. So Staple's comments may be an opening into the Rangers team management on the coach.
During the Pack's winning streak someone suggested Knoblauch as a potential Rangers coach. nyr2k2 responded that Knoblauch's record was pretty mediocre. I seconded nyr2k2's comments by showing the lack of success the team has had in four years prior to the hot streak at the end of the season.
Staple's comments were to discourage the Knoblauch talk. He called this season "mostly blah" except for the playoff run and he seemed to attribute the run to the veterans that Drury and Martin brought in at the trade deadline. He also was negative to the development of Rangers' prospects with the exception of Garand who he said was "having a breakout year."
Mediocre success and lack of prospect development sounds more like an indictment of the coach that a serious Ranger coaching prospect.
He briefly addressed the prospects but I want to focus on his comments on Zac Jones. As I started to think about how the prospects did this year in Hartford including Jones, Eco's Bones did a tremendous writeup on Jones in his May 12 post # 3010. It was like he was in my mind. Hopefully I am summarizing his thoughts accurately. He called Jones a very good offensive defenseman but not a great one. While he runs the PP well Hartford's PP was dismal. He also noted his defensive liabilities and his physical limitations. I would add that I didn't really see Jones improve this season. What we got was pretty much what we have seen.
Staple pointed out that Jones "hasn’t progressed... to being a regular NHLer." I believe Staple is representing the views he is hearing from team sources. I think he is an NHL player but I have my doubts it will be with the Rangers. When I watch the playoffs and see the physical play I don't see Zac Jones. He's never going to run the Rangers PP1 barring an injury to Fox. I doubt Jones wants another year in Hartford and I wouldn't be surprised at seeing a trade for a young cost controlled right winger or a draft pick before the draft.
Staple also was not complimentary to the forward prospects saying "pickings are slim." I'll have some thoughts about the other prospects down the road.
While I was away Arthur Staple of the Athletic had a three part Q&A on the Rangers focusing mostly on coaching. In one of the questions, Staple delved into the Pack. I thought his comments were worth bringing to your attention.
The first comment dealt with the coach. I don't think Staple has written one article this year on the Pack and any information he is getting is very likely very team sources. So Staple's comments may be an opening into the Rangers team management on the coach.
During the Pack's winning streak someone suggested Knoblauch as a potential Rangers coach. nyr2k2 responded that Knoblauch's record was pretty mediocre. I seconded nyr2k2's comments by showing the lack of success the team has had in four years prior to the hot streak at the end of the season.
Staple's comments were to discourage the Knoblauch talk. He called this season "mostly blah" except for the playoff run and he seemed to attribute the run to the veterans that Drury and Martin brought in at the trade deadline. He also was negative to the development of Rangers' prospects with the exception of Garand who he said was "having a breakout year."
Mediocre success and lack of prospect development sounds more like an indictment of the coach that a serious Ranger coaching prospect.
He briefly addressed the prospects but I want to focus on his comments on Zac Jones. As I started to think about how the prospects did this year in Hartford including Jones, Eco's Bones did a tremendous writeup on Jones in his May 12 post # 3010. It was like he was in my mind. Hopefully I am summarizing his thoughts accurately. He called Jones a very good offensive defenseman but not a great one. While he runs the PP well Hartford's PP was dismal. He also noted his defensive liabilities and his physical limitations. I would add that I didn't really see Jones improve this season. What we got was pretty much what we have seen.
Staple pointed out that Jones "hasn’t progressed... to being a regular NHLer." I believe Staple is representing the views he is hearing from team sources. I think he is an NHL player but I have my doubts it will be with the Rangers. When I watch the playoffs and see the physical play I don't see Zac Jones. He's never going to run the Rangers PP1 barring an injury to Fox. I doubt Jones wants another year in Hartford and I wouldn't be surprised at seeing a trade for a young cost controlled right winger or a draft pick before the draft.
Staple also was not complimentary to the forward prospects saying "pickings are slim." I'll have some thoughts about the other prospects down the road.