JuniorNelson
Registered User
Just informationally, I think the Sedins are going to be split soon. It's the only sensible solution Vancouver can enact without horrific cost. In the event they are split their individual value can be calculated.
Daniel has a comparable in Eriksson and I do not feel a discount is warranted.
Henrik, if switched to wing, may remain in Vancouver up to the deadline to demonstrate his value. If he refuses to go to the wing, his value is impacted and a twenty five percent salary retention is fair. If he is moved without Daniel, then fifty percent is not unreasonable. Be assured Henrik has value as a set up man or powerplay specialist but he is too slow to center without speedy linemates.
Edler is Canucks number one and is def not on the table.
Henrik (%50 retained) and Burrows for Sergachev and a pick?
Daniel has a comparable in Eriksson and I do not feel a discount is warranted.
Henrik, if switched to wing, may remain in Vancouver up to the deadline to demonstrate his value. If he refuses to go to the wing, his value is impacted and a twenty five percent salary retention is fair. If he is moved without Daniel, then fifty percent is not unreasonable. Be assured Henrik has value as a set up man or powerplay specialist but he is too slow to center without speedy linemates.
Edler is Canucks number one and is def not on the table.
Henrik (%50 retained) and Burrows for Sergachev and a pick?