CBC Hot Stove: Habs looking for top 4 D

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
I think the issue is Therrien is overplaying Markov and there is a fear the latter might have nothing left in the tank by season's end as was the case last year. Bergevin basically needs someone to eat up more minutes on the left side. Emelin is having a good year so far but he has considerable difficulty with skilled fast moving forwards. Beaulieu is still learning and still makes a lot of mental mistakes.

I don't think the team is looking for an elite defender or an offensive defenseman. They have a potential one in Sergachev. Rather, I suspect they would prefer a workhorse that's not flashy but can play 20 minutes a game. Another Petry in other words but one that can play the left side. They don't grow on trees so it's a matter of wait and see especially this early in the season. Furthermore, Markov right now is playing big minutes so there is no rush.

My two cents

Columbus fans

How about something centered on R . Murray for Mike McCaron

Murray would start a Galchenyuk/Pacioretty discussion. Unless you want to go there don't mention Murray.

Funny, I read the above description (top post I quoted) and thought Jack Johnson. Contrary to popular belief, he's now actually a safe defensive defenseman, and not good offensively (inaccurate shooter / passer). The early returns on his play since he's been taken off top pair are good.

Nope, Murray never has shown that he'll be anything beyond a third pairing D so far, people have started accepting that reality.

You might be thinking of someone else. Ryan Murray has been at least second pair since he started in the league as a solid second pair D next to Wiz three years ago. The numbers / eye test support that. He was recently part of team NA's shutdown pair along with Seth Jones.
 

nobody0211

Registered User
Sep 25, 2014
366
8
Plant City
He makes 5M a season. How do you expect them to fit that under the cap without sending money back? Plus, Scherbak is a nothing prospect right now.

Im not too familiar with who makes what...I especially didn't think Edler was making that much...good for him.
 

Positive Vibes

Habs4Life
Jun 24, 2016
1,239
516
Canada
After interacting with some Habs fans in other threads, I firmly believe the going offer is:

Scraps for legit top 4 D.


Montreal cant offer much off the current roster without creating another big hole .. to solve another one. All they have left is picks and prospects, neither of which will be stellar. Their 1st will likely be fairly late in the 1st round, probably around 20th+. Their prospect pool is fine but other than Sergachev, there arent any blue chippers. Unless the offer is their 1st + Sergachev, I dont see a top 4 in the cards.

When a team is in win now mode it doesnt make sense to trade there best players for a top 4 D- man lol, a 1st pick and sergachev for a top for D-man? that better be a small add for a top 2 d man.

not really sure who youve been talking too but at the end of the day they arent the gm
 

TT1

Registered User
May 31, 2013
23,877
6,437
Montreal
Yeah, you're probably right. He would be the perfect fit for Montreal though on that top pairing. Thought maybe Chicago could be enticed with a 1st (draft is in Chicago) and a couple young pieces.

Doubtful though, he's definitely a core piece.

Definitely, hes one of the most elite defensive dman in the league, on top of that he's a left shot. Adding a player in the mold of Vlasic/Hammer/Tanev (if he was LD) would be the dream case scenario for us.

I think Brodin has the potential to develop into that type of player tho, he's already a very solid defensive dman. He'd compliment Weber well because he's a good skater/passer aswell.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,989
35,777
40N 83W (approx)
I am not saying one on one but Mccaron plus something from Montreal would make it.

Columbus have Jones and werenski on D who are more sure bets than Murray so far. He is good but he has been injured a few times which raises some questions.

Only if the "plus something" that gets added is the actual centerpiece of the trade - say, Galchenyuk.

Sure, Werenski-Jones has been awesome. But we still have a second pairing to think about. We have no reason to move him unless you're giving us an upgrade at C - and we have no interest in Plekanec.
 

CanadianPensFan1

Registered User
Jun 13, 2014
7,051
2,049
Canada
When a team is in win now mode it doesnt make sense to trade there best players for a top 4 D- man lol, a 1st pick and sergachev for a top for D-man? that better be a small add for a top 2 d man.

not really sure who youve been talking too but at the end of the day they arent the gm

Ya gotta give to get. Which was sort of my point. Montreal has nothing to offer a team to be able to bring back a top 4 dman. Maybe at the deadline but I doubt even then.

Also .. when did it become a top 2 dman?

Your last comment isnt worth commenting on
 
Last edited:

NobleSix

High Tech Low-Life.
Apr 20, 2013
17,170
16,676
CyberSpace
www.ilovebees.co
Only if the "plus something" that gets added is the actual centerpiece of the trade - say, Galchenyuk.

Sure, Werenski-Jones has been awesome. But we still have a second pairing to think about. We have no reason to move him unless you're giving us an upgrade at C - and we have no interest in Plekanec.

Lol. If the habs offered Galchenyuk for Murray, Jarmo would take it and run. Galchenyuk+McCarron for Murray? Gimme a break man. That's terrible.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,989
35,777
40N 83W (approx)
Lol. If the habs offered Galchenyuk for Murray, Jarmo would take it and run. Galchenyuk+McCarron for Murray? Gimme a break man. That's terrible.
I could have elaborated and said that one didn't even need to include McCarron, if that really bothers you that much. The fact of the matter is that, whatever he may be to Montreal or other teams, McCarron is utterly valueless to Columbus - we have tons of high quality wing prospects and tons of scorers with size at all levels; he wouldn't have anywhere to play. Trying to suggest that he could be the centerpiece of a trade for virtually anyone on the Blue Jackets roster, let alone one of our better defensemen that we MIGHT only move ONLY for a C upgrade, is lunacy.

I mean, there's some folks we'd take him in return for, but that'd be mostly to save money with players we don't want anymore. Say, Dalton Prout. Or the rights to Gregory Campbell.
 

Positive Vibes

Habs4Life
Jun 24, 2016
1,239
516
Canada
Ya gotta give to get. Which was sort of my point. Montreal has nothing to offer a team to be able to bring back a top 4 dman. Maybe at the deadline but I doubt even then.

Also .. when did it become a top 2 dman?

Your last comment isnt worth commenting on

guess you didnt read the OP man, you have to give to get but why would the habs give something other teams fans want in return for top 4 D-Men which in their eyes is a top talent foward that makes no sense as a habs fan,if anything we are still lacking in that department.

you do realize not every team is a contending team right? if you dont think the assets we have are worth your d -men move on stop talking about something you dont think is going to happen we can make a deal with another team.

isnt worth commenting on because im correct, you have talked to other habs 'fans' about what they want to give up for a top D-man,that may not entice you but your sure as hell not getting chucky/gally or any other good young foward for your D-man when we can use other assets to get one elsewhere.
 

RSeen

Registered User
Oct 26, 2011
6,799
2,158
Toronto
According to Kypreos, the Habs are in the market for a top 4 D.
What's available and at what cost?

My personal preference is Cam Fowler, who I think would be a perfect partner for Weber, but no idea if Habs have what it would cost or would be willing to part with it if they do.
I think they are mainly looking for a #2 guy to pair with Weber on the top pair but they are calling it top 4, I think mainly because there is no guarantee Therrien will play the person in the top pairing.

Other options?

Weber is the #2.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad