Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Training Camp Begins

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

theguardianII

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
3,566
1,826
Clearly Tocchet is absolutely committed to stapling DeBrusk to a line with Pettersson......but the audition continues for right-wingers. I guess either Sprong or Hoglander might figure into the mix eventually. But would love to see Lekkerimaki get at least another game or two.
Ya probably but Debrusk is a better fit with Miller's line. Boeser is too slow to be the #1 forechecker and asking Miller to do it all the time even though he is great at it, will wear him down quicker.
I think Sprong will end up with EP because EP has slowed notably and they need his speed.
I don't see Lekkermaki making the team at the start unless to fill in for injuries, not a boards guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David71

quat

Faking Life
Apr 4, 2003
15,409
2,529
Duncan
One coach says play and the other in charge of goalies says no.
Power struggle.
What if Clarke goes to Seattle and creates another great goalie? They are already more of a shut down team.
What if he goes to Calgary and takes their goalies up a notch or two? Enough to make them a possible rival?

It seems very strange that the Canucks are letting him go anywhere while under contract. Is it that he may have a story he could tell?
There's definitely something odd going on. I've grown accustomed to the net being a strength for the Canucks. Hope that doesn't go south if/when Clark leaves.
 

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,625
7,532
Montreal, Quebec
Is it really going to be a surprise if the Canucks finish 4th or 5th in the division? Division rivals have more cap space, NHL depth, prospects and draft picks to go after top end player trades.

Yes, it would be. Vegas has pretty weak forward depth and LA is a mess. That alone should make us a lock to finish top three in our division. Falling to 5th means the likes of Calgary or Seattle who have done practically nothing not only catch us but pull ahead

That would be an epic collapse that would legitimately break at least some confidence in management. A lot would need to go wrong for us to fall into 5th.
 

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,301
1,192
Yes, it would be. Vegas has pretty weak forward depth and LA is a mess. That alone should make us a lock to finish top three in our division. Falling to 5th means the likes of Calgary or Seattle who have done practically nothing not only catch us but pull ahead

That would be an epic collapse that would legitimately break at least some confidence in management. A lot would need to go wrong for us to fall into 5th.
Anything less than 100 points is a massive disappointment. Even if Demko is hurt long term they have adequate goaltending and some truly elite skaters. Fans having tantrums because Forbort had a rough pre season outing or EP had a sour look on his face and struggled with being nicked up last year dragging various line mates around. It's the pre season. I guess it gives some folks something to bitch about? The roster is solid. Forbort was brought on to PK and add another big body/depth to the blue line. He isn't counted on to be a real difference maker back there. He's a one year bandaid. The top 4 D is solid. They have a great 1/2 punch in the middle. They have some good depth on the wings. The rubber pants brigade will hopefully chill out a bit.....There's some really good indica out there right now.

I will get worried if things aren't going well by the conclusion of the WS.

Saying this season could easily be as bad as 2016 is asinine.
 
Last edited:

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,565
1,764
vancouver
a couple of nights ago tocheet was referencing about "certain players not in "tiptop game shape" wonder who that could be? veterans.

I think we are fine at center and with Raty having a good camp and Aman in the fold we have depth. I think we need a really good RHD more than a LHD.
cant we find both? example. rasmaus andderson on the 2nd pairing with soucy. then a cheaper LHD elsewhere.
 

Nick Lang

Registered User
May 14, 2015
2,307
787
a couple of nights ago tocheet was referencing about "certain players not in "tiptop game shape" wonder who that could be? veterans.


cant we find both? example. rasmaus andderson on the 2nd pairing with soucy. then a cheaper LHD elsewhere.

With what cap space?
 

Nick Lang

Registered User
May 14, 2015
2,307
787
trade some guys. hoglander and whoeveer else. place demko on ltir

Hoglander makes $1.1 mil and would need to be replaced by at least a $750,000 player. Same as anyone else. $350,000 isn't going to get you very far. If Demko goes on IR you need to have $5 mil in space to bring him back when healthy.
 

oceanchild

Registered User
Jul 5, 2009
3,728
1,773
Whitehorse, YT
a couple of nights ago tocheet was referencing about "certain players not in "tiptop game shape" wonder who that could be? veterans.


cant we find both? example. rasmaus andderson on the 2nd pairing with soucy. then a cheaper LHD elsewhere.
That would be ideal. I just think Hughes and Soucy are a better group than Hronek and Myers and it isn’t particularly close. I think Andersson would be ideal.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad