It's really unusual to have a player step away for 'personal reasons' and not have something to do with the Player's Assistance Program. Then to demand that we not ask questions in order to 'respect their privacy' and 'support the player and his family' is just asking for speculation to run amok.
I think this management team has been excellent overall. But its PR has been a bit of a mess. From the way Boudreau was handled near the end of his tenure to the way it reports injuries to EP's signing standoff and now this.
I think at times they've naively done things in a way that would work in Pittsburgh but not in a Canadian market.
A couple of the things you mention, though, were done by Rutherford/Allvin to get results, and they worked. The Boudreau mess was because the owner was a Bruce There It Is fanboy who wouldn't fire the bad coach he had personally hired to bring in the new coach that was needed, and Rutherford basically decided to throw gas on the fire to make the situation untenable. It was a gross week, but it was what needed to happen. Same thing with the way they handled the Pettersson prima donna contract stuff.
The trade chip for this year should probably be Silovs, not Lankinen. Silovs probably has little value, but there has to be some internal discussions on Silovs’ future and how that plays into Demko’s health / Lankinen’s role and ask on next contract. If Lank is asking like $2.5M or less, we should look long and hard at that as Demko insurance or whatever direction management sees
Silovs is worthless right now. Can't do much but send him to Abbotsford and hope he plays his way back into being worth a mid-round pick or something.
I think Lankinen is almost certain to re-sign here and we'll be running a Demko-Lankinen platoon going forward.