Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Christmas Presents

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,926
5,178
Just wanna say if you can't resign Lankinen by the trade deadline then you trade him for a 2nd (hell you could probably even get a 1st).

Let's be honest. Demko is our goalie and will be starting in the playoffs. Do you really think it's a good idea to hold onto Lankinen (miss out on a high pick) just for 10 regular season games and watch him walk in the off season?

And if Demko isn't our goalie in the playoffs then you throw any dollar amount you can at Lankinen and lock him up.

Couldn't be more simple really.
I couldn’t disagree more. I think you need to go 1a and 1b moving forward with Demko. He’s proven to be unreliable in terms of health and should be starting 40-50 games.

I think you try to sign Lankinen for three more years at 3 million per of so and then roll both next year. The tricky part will be the year after when Demko’s a UFA.
 

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,278
3,147
The entire time I’ve followed this team, under several different regimes, they’ve never moved an asset at its peak because it was smart.

Usually, hold on until the asset dies or leaves for nothing.

It would be such a forward thinking move to build Demko up and move either him or Lankinen. Could probably get a haul.

I would move Boeser, Suter and anyone else I could. This team has a 0% chance to win with its defense as is. As they have already moved so many assets for rentals I really don’t think they can do it anymore.

Horvat?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ephmrl

Baby Pettersson

Moderator
Mar 8, 2014
9,540
10,398
Saskatoon
I couldn’t disagree more. I think you need to go 1a and 1b moving forward with Demko. He’s proven to be unreliable in terms of health and should be starting 40-50 games.

I think you try to sign Lankinen for three more years at 3 million per of so and then roll both next year. The tricky part will be the year after when Demko’s a UFA.
I couldn't agree more. I've said many times we need to resign Lankinen and I'm 100% ok with keeping Demko too. It's what I prefer.

So my point still stands. If you can't resign Lankinen you have to trade him by the deadline.

Nothing bugs me more then letting value walk for nothing in UFA. Sell high buy low baby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David71

Baby Pettersson

Moderator
Mar 8, 2014
9,540
10,398
Saskatoon
I don’t understand why people are talking about selling half the guys on the team. Are we not supposed to be competing in this window? We should be buyers, full stop.
We are buyers and we will be. But our window with Hughes is just opening. It's also a smart thing to keep the window open for as long as we can.

So if guys like Lankinen and Boeser are going to walk you trade em and recoup a ton of value.

Obviously plan A better be to extend them however.

I think that's where the talk of selling is coming from. Noone wants to blow the team up. We just want sustained success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David71

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
4,118
5,484
I don’t understand why people are talking about selling half the guys on the team. Are we not supposed to be competing in this window? We should be buyers, full stop.

trying to get too clever and acting like this is a stock market simulator and buying low and selling high is how you get rich

teams should only really operate in two modes: sell anything that's declining in value and buy stuff that's increasing in value (rebuild) OR buy buy buy and sell only when you need to do so to make room to buy buy buy

vancouver should be in the latter mode as long as hughes, miller, boeser and pettersson are all on the roster and relatively healthy
 

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,917
1,929
vancouver
Friedman can be so frustrating. On the one hand says rumors got out of control and crossed the line, and then drops his weird little "Miller has to bend, everyone has to bend" comment that will do nothing but fan the flames of rumors. He can be such a hack sometimes.
the hell does that mean. miller has to bend and everyone has to bend"? so the mgmnt has to keep a short leash on miller because hes the vocal one? and is and will at somepoint blow up at a teammate or coach?
 

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,917
1,929
vancouver
Management realizes there’s puck-moving deficiencies= well duh should have thought of that during free agency.. now they have to rectify their mistakes by cutting loose with Vd and possibly other players.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,467
49,188
Junktown
the hell does that mean. miller has to bend and everyone has to bend"? so the mgmnt has to keep a short leash on miller because hes the vocal one? and is and will at somepoint blow up at a teammate or coach?

The idea is that Miller and teammates need to coexist and meet in the middle. Like how normal human interactions work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David71

Wisp

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
7,745
2,450
I don’t understand why people are talking about selling half the guys on the team. Are we not supposed to be competing in this window? We should be buyers, full stop.
The point of the NHL is to accrue value, not win games!
 

just22

Registered User
Aug 2, 2009
4,519
1,316
We are buyers and we will be. But our window with Hughes is just opening. It's also a smart thing to keep the window open for as long as we can.

So if guys like Lankinen and Boeser are going to walk you trade em and recoup a ton of value.

Obviously plan A better be to extend them however.

I think that's where the talk of selling is coming from. Noone wants to blow the team up. We just want sustained success.
If Hughes decides to walk in 2 years that’s all a moot point. Do everything you can to win now instead of worrying about some window being open longer.

Worrying about keeping our window open and not trading our picks/prospects to bolster the team was Mike Gillis’ downfall to be honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David71 and Wisp

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,974
16,473
Teams around the league are becoming desperate for d-men. The Wild lost Jake Middleton to what looks like a long-term injury; and put in a claim for Travis Dermott when he was put on waivers by the Oilers.

The Colorado Avalanche put in a claim for Dakota Mermis when the Leafs put him on waivers; and the aforementioned Oilers put in a claim for Alec Regula when the Bruins put him on waivers.

Nothing against any of these guys, but when top teams like the Wild, Av's and Oilers are putting in waiver claims, you know they must be really hurting on the blueline.

Unfortunately there's very little out there right now that can help the Canucks......and if they do acquire somebody, it's going to cost them an arm and a leg.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad