Going Full White Sox - The 2024 Chicago White Sox, a historic tale of futility (41-121 record)

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,422
23,315
Chicagoland
this should help a quick turnaround happen


I mean team is going to be terrible so why should they spend $ this offseason?

They had a 150M+ payroll to start this season so its not surprising that they will go with low payroll as they suck and try to rebuild

No team spends big $ during rebuilding

They will likely look in bargain/clearance market in FA

More vets like Pham/DeJong who they would then likely flip in season for some longshot prospect and hope they can find a reclamation project like Fedde who they can then flip as well

Though as seen with horrid returns on Cease/Fedde/etc trades, Getz is terrible GM
 

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
20,091
3,771
in the midnight sea
I mean team is going to be terrible so why should they spend $ this offseason?

They had a 150M+ payroll to start this season so its not surprising that they will go with low payroll as they suck and try to rebuild

No team spends big $ during rebuilding

They will likely look in bargain/clearance market in FA

More vets like Pham/DeJong who they would then likely flip in season for some longshot prospect and hope they can find a reclamation project like Fedde who they can then flip as well

Though as seen with horrid returns on Cease/Fedde/etc trades, Getz is terrible GM


I'm just not a fan of teams in large markets being cheap
 

Marc the Habs Fan

Moderator
Nov 30, 2002
99,867
11,713
Longueuil
The worst team of the modern era stuff is suddenly in doubt. 2 straight wins and they are up 3-0 tonight as they go win for #36 with still 5 more games against the hapless Angels. In my view, going 40-122 gets them off the hook since they would tie the 1962 Mets in wins.
 
Last edited:

hawksrule

Lot of brains but no polish
May 18, 2014
21,203
11,083
The worst team of the modern era stuff is suddenly in doubt. 2 straight wins and they are up 3-0 tonight as they go win for #36 with still 5 more games against the hapless Angels. In my view, going 40-122 gets them off the hook since they would tie the 1962 Mets in wins.
I’d agree at 41-121. But 40-122 is objectively worse than 40-120, and also sets a new losses mark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blackhawkswincup

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
20,091
3,771
in the midnight sea
At this point they might as well lose all the remaining games, make it nearly impossible for any teams to break their "record" in the future, at least break the Mets mark by a few games
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,138
16,777
3 more against the angels and then 3 against detroit

i expect another 2-3 wins the rest of the way
 

SwordsgoneWild

WhenyougazeintotheabysstheBuffaloSabresgazeback
Mar 6, 2011
13,267
4,094
Lake Worth,Fl
120 Ls is absolutely insane. I thought the early 2010s Astros were terrible but this is a whole new level of suckage and I watched those teams lose 426 games over a 4 year period. Granted that was an intentional scorched earth rebuild and tank that was given the greenlight by ownership.

Hopefully you all follow our path and be a a contender in a few years.
 

hawksrule

Lot of brains but no polish
May 18, 2014
21,203
11,083
Now is where the real fun begins. Six games to go. One more loss breaks the record for most losses. Two more losses guarantees them a worse record than the ‘62 Mets. Three more losses guarantees they won’t hit 40 wins. Four more losses gives them the lowest winning percentage in 125 years.

As a kid I always wondered what it was like for people to witness that Mets team.
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,422
23,315
Chicagoland
Now is where the real fun begins. Six games to go. One more loss breaks the record for most losses. Two more losses guarantees them a worse record than the ‘62 Mets. Three more losses guarantees they won’t hit 40 wins. Four more losses gives them the lowest winning percentage in 125 years.

As a kid I always wondered what it was like for people to witness that Mets team.

I thought the shockingly awful 2018 was going to be low point for franchise. Would never have thought they would fall as far as they are now

For decades as a fan the worst Sox usually ended up was being a slightly below .500 club and disappointing

Seriously between 1990 (My first game as kid and When I got into baseball) and 2012 they only finished below .500 mark 7 times

Sox were a model of consistently competitive but disappointing franchise
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,138
16,777
tomorrow we'll either see the sox set the record for most losses in the modern era or the angels set the franchise record for most losses in a season
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,138
16,777
sox look like they're going to sweep the pathetic angels (who will set their own franchise record for most losses in a season today)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad