The funny thing is Poulin is raw but still looks better than DP did for his first four seasons.
And we're nervous because our two very young goalies highly accoladed young goalies aren't developing as fast as other non-power forwards do?
21 gp 17 starts 1045mins 7-9-0 2.76 546 498 .912 0
if he progresses past .500 next year (he was .500 before this season}, his fourth limited duty year, compare it to DP. Five years for DP to be .500 with better teams. Poulin isn't thrown into the starter role prematurely as well but rather being groomed.
Now add Nielson is being groomed. Time is on their side. Fundamentals are being improved upon {anyone wanna comment on Poulin's fundamentals now vs. two seasons ago?} and the team is allowing them to earn icetime.
If Nabby can stay on two more years, Poulin and Nielson will have had a luxury Isles goalies never get anymore - A PROPER DEVELOPMENT.
Hrudey took five years to become tandem, seven for starter for the record. He was 23 when his career took off. He had some sloppy moments when he first came up, but showed a lot of poise. He took the role and never looked back.
Now we have a fanbase that has a set OCD pattern demanding a prospect come in and shine or get sent packing or if they are sold a la NINO and DP, stay on forever, "because the label said so."
I'm not sold Nino isn't gonna be a top line winger. I think he could blossom on HIS SCHEDULE. Same goes for any prospect. Same should go for Poulin and Nielson. When they are ready, they will be ready. Don't call them starters, saviors, busts, scrubs, anything until they earn it. Right now, we have a solid Nabby {some brain trusts describe as 137 years old} who starts 7/8 of the season. We have 1/8 for the kid to get his feet wet{ter}. Next year the kid has to earn 1/4 or more. Hope he does. Him or Nielson.
And some will be upset he didn't fit the OCD timeline mandated by forum psychology.
And FWIW, I do that Bernier trade in a heartbeat! No on Miller.