News Article: Georgiev requests trade

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Been saying since last year that he should’ve been moved, Lundqvist playing to end of contract, etc…

Now we’ve got another year of Lundqvist’s buyout on the books and Georgiev’s value in the toilet with no leverage since he requested a trade. Another asset’s value run into the ground

Hank couldn’t have played anyway while his $1.5 million the books is irrelevant.
 
Well if he wanted a team to trade for him for a starter or 1A role, he probably should have played better.

Yeah, he wasn't exactly a world beater last season.
Been saying since last year that he should’ve been moved, Lundqvist playing to end of contract, etc…

Now we’ve got another year of Lundqvist’s buyout on the books and Georgiev’s value in the toilet with no leverage since he requested a trade. Another asset’s value run into the ground

What were we going to get for him? Can't see the return being better than a 2nd or 3rd. He didn't exactly dominate last season. I don't think we've lost so much value here. Goalies typically have little value and he wasn't a proven #1 so we were never getting a lot for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRangers16
Yeah, that's probably it. Solid post.

It’s just a joke, hombre.

930A88DA-31B7-4F82-BDBF-7D03D583FAB5.jpeg
 
What were we going to get for him? Can't see the return being better than a 2nd or 3rd. He didn't exactly dominate last season. I don't think we've lost so much value here. Goalies typically have little value and he wasn't a proven #1 so we were never getting a lot for him.

More than whatever we’re going to get now. And last season wouldn’t have factored into his trade value - which would’ve been a good thing. Yeah, it might be 3rd instead of a 4th, or whatever, but the three goalie thing never made a lick of sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRangers16
Been saying since last year that he should’ve been moved, Lundqvist playing to end of contract, etc…

Now we’ve got another year of Lundqvist’s buyout on the books and Georgiev’s value in the toilet with no leverage since he requested a trade. Another asset’s value run into the ground

Not trading Georgiev if we had the chance was definitely the wrong move but this team has a habit of holding onto assets for too long like grim death.
 
I was not impressed with him but until we have a better option I would keep him and hope he improves his value. I do not care what he requested. If he did not want to be here then do not sign a contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lays and LOFIN
He's not consistent enough to be a starter but I guess he's gonna have to run around the league a bit to figure that out.

Glad we are ridding ourselves of an unpopular player I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
I like Georgiev a lot, completely understand his desire to go somewhere else where he has a better shot of competing for a 1/1A spot. Hope he succeeds, last season was a step back for him but it seems to be the norm these days for goalies to oscillate between good years and bad years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LOFIN
Honestly with all the cap space we have this year I would trade him to the Oilers for Koskinen and their 1st round pick. Koskinen is terrible but we could bury him and have Kincaid or whoever back up Shest.

Assuming georgies value is a 2nd or 3rd and dumping Koskinen will cost them a 2nd. So 2 2nds is basically a middle to late 1st round pick and I would assume that's where the Oilers finish this upcoming year.

FYI Oilers don't have a 2nd, 3rd or 4th this upcoming year so its possible they make that move.
 
I like Georgiev a lot, completely understand his desire to go somewhere else where he has a better shot of competing for a 1/1A spot. Hope he succeeds, last season was a step back for him but it seems to be the norm these days for goalies to oscillate between good years and bad years.
Yeah pretty much. He's good enough to work in an equal tandem IMO.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad