Generic Tank Thread - The end is nigh...

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Havre

Registered User
Jul 24, 2011
8,459
1,733
The difference between having a Top 3 pick or not this year could he the difference of having a franchise player or not. We need to lose.

I love how this happens every year. It all seems so predictable before the draft which players will be top players and who will end up being just good. Now it has become a "truth" that you got to pick top 3 and that the 4th pick is far less valuable then the 3rd.

Sure I would rather pick 3rd, but the idea that the difference in value is "that special" this year I don't believe for a second.
 

valkynax

The LEEDAR
Sponsor
May 19, 2011
10,910
12,317
Burnaby
Atrocious tank night, one of the worst.

But consider how satanically lucky we've been for the past month in terms of tanking, one bad night won't be of any major concerns.

Repair the tank here and there and we march on.
advance-wars-megatank-papercraft-pt2advance-wars-megatank-papercraft-pt2.jpg
 

Serac

#HFOutcasts
Jun 27, 2014
8,674
2,075
B.C.
I love how this happens every year. It all seems so predictable before the draft which players will be top players and who will end up being just good. Now it has become a "truth" that you got to pick top 3 and that the 4th pick is far less valuable then the 3rd.

Sure I would rather pick 3rd, but the idea that the difference in value is "that special" this year I don't believe for a second.

It is true this year
Matthews, Laine, and Jesse are in a tier by themselves

In previous years it's not always the case
Take the Mackinnon year
That had a really good top 4

And each year is usually different
It just so happens that this year happens to be a year where the top 3 look to be mega stars
 

me2

Go ahead foot
Jun 28, 2002
37,913
5,605
Make my day.
It is true this year
Matthews, Laine, and Jesse are in a tier by themselves

In previous years it's not always the case
Take the Mackinnon year
That had a really good top 4

And each year is usually different
It just so happens that this year happens to be a year where the top 3 look to be mega stars

Or McEichel had two. While there is no guarantee that McDavid or Eichel end up the best player, but you want to be grabbing one of the two if you can to maximize your chances.
 

Zombotron

Supreme Overlord of Crap
Jan 3, 2010
18,358
9,927
Toronto
Atrocious tank night, one of the worst.

But consider how satanically lucky we've been for the past month in terms of tanking, one bad night won't be of any major concerns.

Repair the tank here and there and we march on.

It's true. Someone must have sold their soul or dabbled in the dark arts. Was it one of you?
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,265
20,850
Denver Colorado
THANK GOD Anaheim and LA are in a dog fight for positioning so they won't be resting their players yet.

:nod::nod:
------

Our "ROW" is still amazing in case of a tie in points, suck it Calgary and Winnipeg.
 

Havre

Registered User
Jul 24, 2011
8,459
1,733
It is true this year
Matthews, Laine, and Jesse are in a tier by themselves

In previous years it's not always the case
Take the Mackinnon year
That had a really good top 4

And each year is usually different
It just so happens that this year happens to be a year where the top 3 look to be mega stars

Let's see. It is true every year. Top 2, top 3, top 4 whatever. Always top something. And the more it is repeated by the media and on forums the "truer" it becomes.

Early days for the class of 2013 still, but I don't understand how that is a good example. If anything it just proves my point in my opinion. If it was "top 4" or "nothing" that year how does that work with Monahan? Maybe Drouin becomes a better player than Monahan in the end, but I could just as easily see the opposite being true. Even Ristolainen might become a better player than Jones.
 

me2

Go ahead foot
Jun 28, 2002
37,913
5,605
Make my day.
THANK GOD Anaheim and LA are in a dog fight for positioning so they won't be resting their players yet.

:nod::nod:
------

Our "ROW" is still amazing in case of a tie in points, suck it Calgary and Winnipeg.


4th place odds 9.50% 9.6835% 9.8159% 3.1486% 27.3077% 33.1858% 7.3584% 0.0000%

40% chance of being 6/7 . not to mention some weak top 3 odds.
 

a Fool

Emperor has no picks
Mar 14, 2014
2,601
44
It's true. Someone must have sold their soul or dabbled in the dark arts. Was it one of you?

Pros: I will walk the Earth for all time, and we will draft Patrik Laine in the 2016 draft.

Cons: I cannot be exposed to sunlight and must drink the blood of men to survive.
 

dwarf

Registered User
Feb 13, 2007
1,947
239
Victoria, B.C.
Pros: I will walk the Earth for all time, and we will draft Patrik Laine in the 2016 draft.

Cons: I cannot be exposed to sunlight and must drink the blood of men to survive.

If we draft in the top three, you can feast on dwarf.

This management team will find a way to miss the cut off of top end talent and end up picking 6th.
 

palefire

Registered User
Jun 3, 2005
513
35
Oof:

Draft odds based on Monte Carlo model at http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHLlottery.html

Likelihood of overall finish:

23: 0.3%
24: 2.2%
25: 21.4%
26: 21.0%
27: 19.9%
28: 15.9%
29: 11.3%
30: 8.0%

Likelihood of draft pick:

1: 10.4%
2: 10.3%
3: 10.2%
4: 10.7%
5: 16.3%
6: 20.0%
7: 15.8%
8: 5.6%
9: 0.7%

Odds of top three pick: 30.9%
Median draft position: 5
Likeliest draft position: 6
 

palefire

Registered User
Jun 3, 2005
513
35
Odds of top 3 pick based on Monte Carlo model at http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHLlottery.html

Edmonton: 43.2%
Toronto: 38.0%
Columbus: 34.5%
Vancouver: 30.9%
Winnipeg: 29.7%
Calgary: 27.7%
Buffalo: 19.7%
Arizona: 19.1%
Montreal: 16.2%
Ottawa: 11.6%
New Jersey: 9.1%
Colorado: 8.4%
Carolina: 7.6%
Detroit: 2.4%
Boston: 1.0%
Philadelphia: 0.4%
Minnesota: 0.3%
 

CaptainChef

Registered User
Jan 5, 2014
7,868
815
Bedroom Jetsville
Not sure about a lottery system that provides for the 30th place team only having a 20 percent chance of winning the draft lottery....but whatever happens in the last five games, Canucks will get a good player, hopefully an impact d-man.

Just be thankful its only 20% because good chance it could be Edmonton in last place
 

Cocoa Crisp

Registered User
Mar 8, 2006
2,820
0
NYC
All this angst over the consensus top 3 this draft. Is it justified? Are all 3 more or less equivalent? Are any of them franchise players in the making or more like a bluechip, good chance to be a top 6 forward?

I'm lazy and haven't done my homework wading through the Prospects board. Hoping for an executive summary to see whether the tanking is really worth it this year.
 

J Canuck

Registered User
Mar 19, 2013
500
6
the couch
I'll cheer for a win every game and take satisfaction in a loss as it helps for drafting. Win-win for me.

I'd feel dirty cheering for the Canucks to lose and since I'm not at the rink, cheering has zero effect on the outcome anyway. I do feel a tiny bit dirty about cheering Alberta teams these days, but have no problem cheering for them to play in 3 point games.
 

Haagen Dazs

Registered User
Mar 23, 2016
79
5
All this angst over the consensus top 3 this draft. Is it justified? Are all 3 more or less equivalent? Are any of them franchise players in the making or more like a bluechip, good chance to be a top 6 forward?

I'm lazy and haven't done my homework wading through the Prospects board. Hoping for an executive summary to see whether the tanking is really worth it this year.

The general consensus seems to be the following:

Tier 1
Matthews
Laine

Tier 2
Puljujarvi

Tier 3
Dubois
Chychyrn
Tkachuk

There is very little separation between Matthews and Laine

I thought going into this season, Puljujarvi would be competing with Matthews for top spot, however he had a horrific first half and still only ended up scoring something like 2 even strength goals in Liiga. So that's definitely a red flag, however he has all the tools needed to become a special player, hes just the least likely out of the top 3 to do it. I wouldn't be shocked if Dubois ended up the better player though.
 

Nucker101

Foundational Poster
Apr 2, 2013
21,804
17,780
Yeah, at this point I'd suggest for everyone to expect pick 5 or 6. Anyone hoping for a top 3 pick will likely be devastated.
 

CanaFan

Registered User
Feb 19, 2010
19,887
5,849
BC
Blah. This is why I don't cheer for wins. No one will remember last night's game a few months from now.

Agree. I'd prefer to cheer for 15 years of an elite talent and maybe even being the key piece to a Stanley Cup over a single regular season game in a season that's already a dumpster fire.

Last night was bad for this franchise and nothing but. Still bewilders me that people can take any positive out of it.
 

Jarko2004

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
1,024
18
Vancouver Island
You know, the Canucks are a team in recent decline (big time), but the Flames? What's their excuse? They've muddled for years and have already assembled their young talent. They just plain stink of being an Alberta NHL team.
 

PM

Glass not 1/2 full
Apr 8, 2014
9,869
1,664
The Flames have only been rebuilding for a few years and they still managed to beat us last year and are currently better than us this year. What really hurt them was wasting the three years before their rebuild spinning their tires. Sounds awfully familiar...
 

Jimson Hogarth*

Registered User
Nov 21, 2013
12,858
3
The Flames have only been rebuilding for a few years and they still managed to beat us last year and are currently better than us this year. What really hurt them was wasting the three years before their rebuild spinning their tires. Sounds awfully familiar...

A few years? Bro that teams been baaaaad for a while now!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad