Sparksrus3
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2012
- 10,273
- 5,177
Don’t forget the trackers because we came here ….Company laptop --- its locked down.
Its somehow.. SOMEHOW.. even worse on phones.. (which Id assume is how most people view/post)
Don’t forget the trackers because we came here ….Company laptop --- its locked down.
Its somehow.. SOMEHOW.. even worse on phones.. (which Id assume is how most people view/post)
I did edit my comment, as he does score some big goals, but he is a turnover machine. No loss when he goesHasnt he been one of the few guys playing well?
If that “check” happened and the door was closed, there would have been no penalty.It should be a penalty as the “check” was nowhere near the puck or play…. But certainly not a major .
I think you would get hurt worse if Brock slapped him in the face with his flaccid d*** than that “cross check”It should be a penalty as the “check” was nowhere near the puck or play…. But certainly not a major .
I think HIckey’s wrong here - that’s the new standard they’re using. Call the major so you can review it, and get the call correctHickey is 100% correct
How do you review a major penalty then call a minor penalty that wasn’t originally called?
But they didn’t even call a penalty at all until they saw the guy was injuredI think HIckey’s wrong here - that’s the new standard they’re using. Call the major so you can review it, and get the call correct
You’re the crotchety old prick in Toronto, aren’t ya?I can’t explain everything guys. Lol. Just trying to be a voice of reason…..
The major callI think HIckey’s wrong here - that’s the new standard they’re using. Call the major so you can review it, and get the call correct
Just an educated hockey fan who has seen a lot and looks objectively at a play.You’re the crotchety old prick in Toronto, aren’t ya?
With no sense of humor as well, I guessJust an educated hockey fan who has seen a lot and looks objectively at a play.