GDT: Game 79: Columbus at New York Rangers | 4/6 7PM EDT

Samkow

Now do Classical Gas
Jul 4, 2002
16,354
488
Detroit
3119946ed750d25f0f.jpg


25-New-York-city-Skyline-2-United-States.jpg


7:00 PM EDT
Madison Square Garden
New York City, New York

extralarge.png

Lines
Jenner-Johansen-Atkinson
Dubinsky-Anisimov-Foligno
Hartnell-Wennberg-Dano
Calvert-Letestu-Morin

Johnson-Savard
Tyutin-Prout
Goloubef-Connauton

Bobrovsky
McElhinney

Scratches
Boll, Falk, Tropp

Injured
Bourque, Clarkson, Murray, Skille

extralarge.png

Lines
Nash-Brassard-Zuccarello
Kreider-Stepan-Miller
Hagelin-Hayes-St. Louis
Glass-Moore-Fast

McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Boyle
Yandle-Hunwick

Lundqvist
Talbot

Scratches
Sheppard

Injured
Klein​
 

EDM

Registered User
Mar 8, 2008
6,273
2,065
Boy, I gotta give the Rangers credit. They have put together a tough lineup. But the Jackets team that is playing them tonite has a pretty good lineup too. With the Pens and Flyers in a bit of a decline, and Nash and Brassard being the the Rags, I can see the Rangers as becoming our biggest rival over the next few years.
 

1857 Howitzer

******* Linesman
Aug 27, 2007
5,715
193
Ohio
FYI to viewers in Columbus and Cincinnati there's a good chance this game will be on a alternate channel because of Reds opening day. TWC will be 1310 HD and 24 SD if the game is moved.
 

DarkandStormy

Registered User
Apr 29, 2014
7,236
3,432
614
Boy, I gotta give the Rangers credit. They have put together a tough lineup. But the Jackets team that is playing them tonite has a pretty good lineup too. With the Pens and Flyers in a bit of a decline, and Nash and Brassard being the the Rags, I can see the Rangers as becoming our biggest rival over the next few years.

At some point, the Rangers lack of 1st round picks in recent years will catch up with them. Their window is closing quickly, imo.

I think a playoff series with any of those three teams could spark a "rivalry." Familiarity with all three via trades/free agent signings. Proximity favors Pittsburgh (duh). Nash trade suggests Rangers. Hartnell/Voracek/Bob/Mason/etc suggest Flyers could be a fun series, but I think I'd place Philly 3rd on the list of potential rivals right now.
 

useref15

Registered User
Oct 11, 2009
1,985
65
New Jersey
At some point, the Rangers lack of 1st round picks in recent years will catch up with them. Their window is closing quickly, imo.

I think a playoff series with any of those three teams could spark a "rivalry." Familiarity with all three via trades/free agent signings. Proximity favors Pittsburgh (duh). Nash trade suggests Rangers. Hartnell/Voracek/Bob/Mason/etc suggest Flyers could be a fun series, but I think I'd place Philly 3rd on the list of potential rivals right now.


Not sure how you can say our window is closing quickly when we have a ton of young guys as our core such as McDonagh, Stepan, Zuccarello, Kreider, Brassard, Hayes, Hagelin, Miller, etc in their mid to early 20s. Plus guys like Yandle, Staal, Nash, and Girardi who are 30 and younger. And Buchnevich and Skjei who have great potential.
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,316
4,994
The Beach, FL
Not sure how you can say our window is closing quickly when we have a ton of young guys as our core such as McDonagh, Stepan, Zuccarello, Kreider, Brassard, Hayes, Hagelin, Miller, etc in their mid to early 20s. Plus guys like Yandle, Staal, Nash, and Girardi who are 30 and younger. And Buchnevich and Skjei who have great potential.

b/c some of those guys are going to need new contracts and you won't have enough depth to plug in the next player due to the lack of those 1st round picks
 

Johansen2Foligno

CBJ Realest
Jan 2, 2015
9,266
4,178
Not sure how you can say our window is closing quickly when we have a ton of young guys as our core such as McDonagh, Stepan, Zuccarello, Kreider, Brassard, Hayes, Hagelin, Miller, etc in their mid to early 20s. Plus guys like Yandle, Staal, Nash, and Girardi who are 30 and younger. And Buchnevich and Skjei who have great potential.

Yeah, yeah. You got a good team, you don't have to reiterate that to us.
 

DarkandStormy

Registered User
Apr 29, 2014
7,236
3,432
614
b/c some of those guys are going to need new contracts and you won't have enough depth to plug in the next player due to the lack of those 1st round picks

Plus....http://nhlcapspace.com/ Only 7 forwards locked up with contracts next season, plus 7 D, and 2 G. Cap hit is already north of $60 million. Two of the guys without a contract (Hagelin and Stepan) will be expecting raises plus whatever St. Louis decides to do. The cap is supposedly going to settle between $70 and $72 million. Plus, if I'm not mistaken there will be a cap "overage" carrying into next season.

Also, http://www.hockeysfuture.com/team-rankings/fall-team-rankings-2014-15/page/3 Coming into the year the Rangers ranked 28th in terms of their prospect pool (i.e. depth and the future). And that was counting Duclair as the #3 Rangers prospect.

There's no doubt the top end of the Rangers should be good the next few years, but unless they can remedy the cap situation I think it will be tough to have enough depth to compete. Again, as I said originally, just my opinion.
 

BluejacketNut

Registered User
Sep 23, 2006
6,275
211
www.erazzphoto.com
Well, for people thinking they wont be able to keep the Rangers together, what makes you think we can do it successfully? There's the model of how you want to build from within, but as mentioned, by the time everyone is primed and ready to compete, theyre going to want to be paid as well. We can only hope to get to that level, but we'll have the exact same problems then.
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,316
4,994
The Beach, FL
Well, for people thinking they wont be able to keep the Rangers together, what makes you think we can do it successfully? There's the model of how you want to build from within, but as mentioned, by the time everyone is primed and ready to compete, theyre going to want to be paid as well. We can only hope to get to that level, but we'll have the exact same problems then.

very true...that's where having a continuous pipeline going...and what we've had to do over the last few years, totally rebuild the prospect pool and acquire other assets so that we can keep that pipeline moving...
 

Doug19

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
6,542
222
Columbus, OH
When healthy I truly believe 100% that CBJ are better than NYR. We are healthy, I expect our team to play physical and beat them by 2 goals. Obviously they have a better D, but I like our forward group much more.
 

BluejacketNut

Registered User
Sep 23, 2006
6,275
211
www.erazzphoto.com
very true...that's where having a continuous pipeline going...and what we've had to do over the last few years, totally rebuild the prospect pool and acquire other assets so that we can keep that pipeline moving...
Trading away a 1st round pick thats probably much closer to being a 2nd than a 1st, is a risk worth taking when you need the final pieces, a risk I expect our FO to take if/when our time comes.
 

DarkandStormy

Registered User
Apr 29, 2014
7,236
3,432
614
Well, for people thinking they wont be able to keep the Rangers together, what makes you think we can do it successfully? There's the model of how you want to build from within, but as mentioned, by the time everyone is primed and ready to compete, theyre going to want to be paid as well. We can only hope to get to that level, but we'll have the exact same problems then.

It's a little bit different. Next season, they (NYR) have a $7.8 million superstar forward, $26.5 million wrapped up in their defense, and another $10 million spent on goalies. The Jackets will spend about $14 million on defense, and maybe $8-$8.5 million on the goalie position. They have, in my view, more flexibility in the next couple seasons because of some of those contracts. Their flexibility would increase if they could dump Clarkson's contract to an expansion team needing to get to the floor. They also have no cap problem next year (currently at ~$61 million cap payroll with potentially Calvert and/or Letestu to re-sign but that would be about it). The Rangers, meanwhile, will have ~$10 million to spend on 7 forwards, two of whom are Stepan and Hagelin. A third would be St. Louis if he sticks around. They have four defenders making over $4.5 million next year, plus Yandle at $2.9.

Also, the Jackets' prospect pool is objectively deeper and better than the Rangers. This gives them more flexibility when filling out the roster and in making trades. That's not to say there aren't going to be issues for both teams, but the Rangers are very much "win now" (i.e. this year and next), whereas I think Columbus is set up better to compete in the next 2-5 years.

The CBJ could be in a similar cap situation in '17-'18 with Joey likely on at least a 7X7 contract, Hartsy still at $4.75, Clarkson, Dubi, Foligno all above $5, Jenner and Murray on new contracts, a bunch of the '12 and '13 draftees ready for new contracts, Bob still at $7.425, but that's way down the road and a lot will happen by then.
 

BluejacketNut

Registered User
Sep 23, 2006
6,275
211
www.erazzphoto.com
But also, the Rangers are coming off a Stanley Cup final, and expecting to return. We're not close to that yet, once we do, we'll probably have the same types of issues. I dont think you'll be finding any Stanley Cup finals team without cap issues
 

JacketsDavid

Registered User
Jan 11, 2013
2,665
910
When healthy I truly believe 100% that CBJ are better than NYR. We are healthy, I expect our team to play physical and beat them by 2 goals. Obviously they have a better D, but I like our forward group much more.

I wondered what happened to Doug MacLean! :)
 

ca5150

Registered User
Jul 17, 2006
2,863
18
Columbus, Ohio
This is why I wear my 17 jersey to every game, love that guy...he doesn't care who's in the draft!


we bring you this Brandon Dubinsky anecdote from this morning in lower Manhattan, courtesy of Blue Jackets center Ryan Johansen.
"This morning when we got on the bus to come over here, Dubi looked at me with a smirk on his face and said: 'Be your best tonight.'
"He want's to win every time we come here. We all do. There's built-in motivation, for sure."
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad