vadim sharifijanov
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2007
- 29,520
- 17,609
Ronning/Momesso?
ideally more like courtnall - ronning - linden... but i guess that's not going to get us connor mcdavid is it?
Ronning/Momesso?
He'll always be physically overmatched. He needs to change the way he engages.
Agreed. I just think that if you are going to be his size and play in the NHL, you need to have an elite skillset. It doesn't necessarily have to include scoring, but you need to have something that distinguishes you.
Hmm, aside from a bit better face off consistency and losing a couple of fights, what exactly does Richardson bring over Schroeder?
I don't see a ton of upside with Richardson, I don't think he offers an incredible size advantage and I don't think he's a solid enough defensive center to take on tough match ups.I think Richardson is a really under appreciated, versatile 4th line (depth player). He can play all three forward positions and was pretty important for the Canucks penalty kill this season. Plus while acknowledging that size is not everything, he's also 3-4 inches taller and 20-25 pounds heavier than Schroeder.
Sedin - Sedin - Jensen
Burrows - Stastny - Kesler
Higgins - Horvat - Hansen
Sestito-Matthias-Richardson
Next year hopefully..
I think what Bad Goalie is basically inquiring about is contract status for next season. Yes, there are many variables at play when it comes to Jensen being on the roster next season or not, but I think Bad Goalie just wants to know who is still signed and who is not.
@ Bad Goalie: to answer your question, here is the list of forwards signed to one-way NHL contracts next season.
Daniel Sedin
Henrik Sedin
Ryan Kesler
Alex Burrows
David Booth
Chris Higgins
Shawn Matthias
Jannik Hansen
Brad Richardon
Tom Sestito
So yes, there are technically two holes in the forward lineup. This could change depending on who the Canucks trade away and who they sign or bring in via trade, but as of now there is space for Jensen in the lineup next season.
FYI, I got this info from www.capgeek.com, which is probably the most handy hockey website around. It also lists the contracts of non-roster players for every NHL team, aka prospects on ELC's or AHL players on two-way contracts, so it's very much a relevant site for the status of Comets players as well.
@ Bad Goalie
Realistically, Booth gets bought out. All else staying the same... here are the holes as I see them:
Sedin - Sedin - Burrows
_____ - Kesler - ______
Higgins - ______ - Hansen
Sestito - Richardson - Matthias
There are holes to be filled. If Jensen has a good camp, he has a realistic shot of filling one of them.
Santorelli
Kassian
Jensen
Dalpe
Schroeder
Horvat
are assets currently in place with the likely potential of filling some of these.
We don't know about any potential FA signings, trades, buyouts, etc.
Ideally, if we decide to try and compete again next season instead of rebuild, and Jensen continues to perform well on Henrik's wing, I'd like to see:
Sedin - Sedin - Jensen
____ - Kesler - Kassian
Higgins - Santo - Burrows
Matthias - Richardson - Hansen
The 2LW slot could be filled by a FA, a trade, or perhaps Daniel Sedin, Mike Santorelli, Alex Burrows, Nicklas Jensen, or perhaps even Bo Horvat.
Maybe...
Burrows - Sedin - Jensen
Sedin - Kelser - Kassian
Higgins - Santorelli - Hansen
Sestito - Richardson - Matthias
All this to say - there's very much a space for him if he earns a space. Right now, he's doing just that. No guarantees that that continues for the rest of the season and into next training camp. The rigors of a full NHL season are far different than a 20 game tryout at the end of a lost campaign.
Although not official from Tortorella, it seems that Lack will start against TBL and continue to start for the foreseeable future as long as the Canucks have a hope of making the play-offs according to TSN's Farhan Lalji and Jason Bochford.
Farhan Lalji @FarhanLaljiTSN
Torts would not confirm starter vs TBay, but Im told Lack will likely keep starting until the #canucks are mathematically eliminated from PS
Per Botchford:
Unless something changes tonight, Eddie Lack will start again in Tampa, the second of back-to-back games.http://blogs.theprovince.com/2014/0...h-isnt-good-but-lack-in-the-shootout-sure-is/
The Canucks believe Markstrom needs some significant work with his technical game, and have been planning to start Lack until they are mathematically eliminated from the post-season.
Not only do the Canucks believe Lack is more prepared for this, and therefore their best chance to win, they also want to see how he responds with a heavy workload as the team’s undisputed No. 1 goalie.
It would've been cool to have Schroeder play a full season healthy for us to really know what we have. But no matter what arguments anybody brings up, he's still an unknown.
He's pretty close to slipping through and hitting the waiver wire though. Could be in line for an endless amount of pick-ups and ensuing waivings like some guys have gone through.
Matthias probably knocks him off the team. He's only 2 years older and just fits the role so much better. Schroeder isn't an ideal top 6 forward. Will never play on a first line. Could eventually slot into a 2nd line role, but it's still somewhat of a stretch. Has no space on a prototypical 3rd line, and no business on a 4th line.
Really interesting to see if...
Daniel-Hank-Jensen
Burrows-Kesler-Santorelli
Or some combination involving those guys could work out successfully. Pretty floored and disappointed that Daniel will probably be the weakest link. At this point, we'd be better off trying to find a somewhat top end talent to play with Kesler and roll that as a first line.
Yeah, I was optimistic about Schroeder before, but Matthias certainly seems like a much stronger option at this point in time.