GDT: Game 56: Aves vs Stares | 7PM |Valentine's Day 2015 |We Almost Caught Up[MOD WARNING]

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,387
31,649


Here is the Demers Fight/Drama and also the Stuart/Holden hug:laugh:



Penalties on these two plays:

Demers - 10 min misconduct
Demers - 2 min minor for roughing

McLeod - 10 min misconduct
McLeod - 5 min major for fighting
McLeod - 10 min game misconduct

McLeod kicked out of game and Dallas get s a 3 min PP.

:whaaa?:
 
Last edited:

Hesher

Sagan for President
Jan 22, 2013
4,808
622
Slovakia
Penalties on these two plays:

Demers - 10 min misconduct
Demers - 2 min minor for roughing

McLeod - 10 min misconduct
McLeod - 5 min major for fighting
McLeod - 10 min game misconduct

McLeod kicked out of game and Dallas get s a 3 min PP.

:whaaa?:

I don't think I've ever seen only one player getting 5 minutes for fighting. Don't you need two guys to have a fight?
 

expatriatedtexan

Habitual Line Stepper
Aug 17, 2005
16,972
12,658
I don't think I've ever seen only one player getting 5 minutes for fighting. Don't you need two guys to have a fight?

Seen that question a few times and decided to actually look up the answer...and to my surprise sometimes it only takes one to tango...

Rule 46 - Fighting
46.1 Fighting – A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at least
one player punches or attempts to punch an opponent repeatedly or
when two players wrestle in such a manner as to make it difficult for
the Linesmen to intervene and separate the combatants.
The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties with
which they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally to
enable them to differentiate between the obvious degrees of
responsibility of the participants either for starting the fighting or
persisting in continuing the fighting. The discretion provided should be
exercised realistically.​
 

TheStranger

Registered User
Jan 21, 2010
18,400
0
Ottawa, Ontario
Seen that question a few times and decided to actually look up the answer...and to my surprise sometimes it only takes one to tango...

Rule 46 - Fighting
46.1 Fighting – A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at least
one player punches or attempts to punch an opponent repeatedly or
when two players wrestle in such a manner as to make it difficult for
the Linesmen to intervene and separate the combatants.
The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties with
which they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally to
enable them to differentiate between the obvious degrees of
responsibility of the participants either for starting the fighting or
persisting in continuing the fighting. The discretion provided should be
exercised realistically.​

So like when Demers hit Mcleod in the face 5 times without getting hit back?
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,566
19,393
w/ Renly's Peach
tracking those scoring chances this year, i was surprised how many chances talbot gets. he just has almost no finishing ability. he had some when he was younger but it's almost all gone now.

Talbs does a lot of things well out there, he just has no hands. If you could combine him with briere's hands you'd have a really good third liner. But unfortunately we can't just merge the two of them into one player.
 

Hesher

Sagan for President
Jan 22, 2013
4,808
622
Slovakia
Seen that question a few times and decided to actually look up the answer...and to my surprise sometimes it only takes one to tango...

Rule 46 - Fighting
46.1 Fighting – A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at least
one player punches or attempts to punch an opponent repeatedly or
when two players wrestle in such a manner as to make it difficult for
the Linesmen to intervene and separate the combatants.
The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties with
which they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally to
enable them to differentiate between the obvious degrees of
responsibility of the participants either for starting the fighting or
persisting in continuing the fighting. The discretion provided should be
exercised realistically.​

Thanks. You learn something new every day :)
 

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,387
31,649
Seen that question a few times and decided to actually look up the answer...and to my surprise sometimes it only takes one to tango...

Rule 46 - Fighting
46.1 Fighting – A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at least
one player punches or attempts to punch an opponent repeatedly or
when two players wrestle in such a manner as to make it difficult for
the Linesmen to intervene and separate the combatants.
The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties with
which they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally to
enable them to differentiate between the obvious degrees of
responsibility of the participants either for starting the fighting or
persisting in continuing the fighting. The discretion provided should be
exercised realistically.​

So McLeod's "repeated punches" must have been those two quick jabs to the bench that didn't land when he was surrounded by four Dallas Stars on the ice, three Dallas Stars on the bench holding him, and Demers who threw 5-6 of his own punches over the linesman at him connecting on a few.

Because the other play was a shove that grazed his face where he already had stitches, so clearly he didn't punch anyone "repeatedly." Big tough guy Demers with two NHL fights in five years thinks it's a good idea to poke away at Varly for like the fifth time, and expect no one to do anything about it because he's got stitches in his mouth, and then throw punches at a guy being held by the linesman and 7 of his Stars teammates. :laugh:
 

expatriatedtexan

Habitual Line Stepper
Aug 17, 2005
16,972
12,658
Personally...I think the two takeaways from that rule for me were:

1. "A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at least
one player
punches or attempts to punch an opponent..."

2. "The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties with
which they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally..."

I don't like the call as it was made but I can see how it is at the ref's discretion the way the rules are written. Also, by ejecting both players I think the refs were employing a little game management to ensure the stupid stuff got nipped in the bud there and then. There was still quite a bit of time in the third for stupidity to ensue if they didn't get control of the situation.
 

TheStranger

Registered User
Jan 21, 2010
18,400
0
Ottawa, Ontario
Talbs does a lot of things well out there, he just has no hands. If you could combine him with briere's hands you'd have a really good third liner. But unfortunately we can't just merge the two of them into one player.

Not with that attitude. Talbot and Briere scratched and sent to the Large Haldron Collider
 

TheStranger

Registered User
Jan 21, 2010
18,400
0
Ottawa, Ontario
Personally...I think the two takeaways from that rule for me were:

1. "A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at least
one player
punches or attempts to punch an opponent..."

2. "The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties with
which they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally..."

I don't like the call as it was made but I can see how it is at the ref's discretion the way the rules are written. Also, by ejecting both players I think the refs were employing a little game management to ensure the stupid stuff got nipped in the bud there and then. There was still quite a bit of time in the third for stupidity to ensue if they didn't get control of the situation.

There's still no real way in all of that that Dallas should have ended up with 3 minutes of major penalty powerplay. At best it should have been 2, 10, game for both.
 

expatriatedtexan

Habitual Line Stepper
Aug 17, 2005
16,972
12,658
There's still no real way in all of that that Dallas should have ended up with 3 minutes of major penalty powerplay. At best it should have been 2, 10, game for both.

I believe the refs viewed McLeod as the aggressor (the initial stuff behind the net) and chose to penalize the AVs by putting them shorthanded to exert control on the situation...like I said, it smacks of game management and while I don't agree with it, that is something we do see fairly often from officials in the NHL.
 

StayAtHomeAv

Registered User
May 20, 2014
6,681
127
Seen that question a few times and decided to actually look up the answer...and to my surprise sometimes it only takes one to tango...

Rule 46 - Fighting
46.1 Fighting – A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at least
one player punches or attempts to punch an opponent repeatedly or
when two players wrestle in such a manner as to make it difficult for
the Linesmen to intervene and separate the combatants.
The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties with
which they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally to
enable them to differentiate between the obvious degrees of
responsibility of the participants either for starting the fighting or
persisting in continuing the fighting. The discretion provided should be
exercised realistically.​

Keyword I see is "repeatedly". Didn't cody just throw one punch? And I was under the impression the gloves need to come off, otherwise it's just a roughing penalty, but I'm probably just ignorantly assuming that.
 

TheStranger

Registered User
Jan 21, 2010
18,400
0
Ottawa, Ontario
Keyword I see is "repeatedly". Didn't cody just throw one punch? And I was under the impression the gloves need to come off, otherwise it's just a roughing penalty, but I'm probably just ignorantly assuming that.

I doubt gloves NEED to come off for them to call fighting it's just that 95% of the time that gloves are dropped we see fighting Majors, and 99% of the time gloves don't come off all we see is roughing. I think the latter is because if gloves aren't dropped to initiate a "fight" the refs are generally there to pull the guys apart and it's more of a scrum.

If two guys decided to go off by themselves and have a full fledged fight with gloves on, well, I imagine it would be still called fighting.

That said, almost every game you see someone get popped a few times with a gloved fist and there's certainly never fighting majors attached to it.
 

expatriatedtexan

Habitual Line Stepper
Aug 17, 2005
16,972
12,658
Of course every year there are some fights that are so dull the players should be given delay of game penalties instead of fighting. :laugh:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad