The Faulker 27
Registered User
Zack Boychuk liked one of my Instagram posts from the game. Then he also liked a few pictures of my cats.
I'm pretty sure Zach sent my 90 year old grandmother a friend request.
Zack Boychuk liked one of my Instagram posts from the game. Then he also liked a few pictures of my cats.
I'm pretty sure Zach sent my 90 year old grandmother a friend request.
Dougie replaced himself with a newer, better model.
I need more allowance
Why? Because I do
But I want a new Doug!One might even call him a Brand Spanking New Doug
But I want a new Doug!
So I listened to most of that on Sirius/XM on my drive home from drill. they had the Ottowa announcers on.
They were two of the biggest dicks I've ever heard on sports radio. They seem to have a penchant for making fun of guys names. When Dougie scored, one of them went on a tirade about "how does a grown man call himself dougie? What is he like 8?!" and similar for several minutes. Then they started in on Wallmark, calling him "Walmart, the highest grossing thing down in those parts" or words to that effect.
I mean I'm all for being a dick if soembody deserves it, like Tom Wilson or something, but damn.
I guess we have the only announcers that treat opposing teams with respect.
It’s been nice to see this team is finally getting some secondary scoring the last four games. We’ve finally gotten some goals from guys like Faulk, McGinn, Hamilton, McKegg, Foegele, Wallmark. The scoring from those guys stepping up has been the difference maker in us winning these games.
That's what he gets for Christmas every year. the new improved Dougie version.One might even call him a Brand Spanking New Doug
It’s been nice to see this team is finally getting some secondary scoring the last four games. We’ve finally gotten some goals from guys like Faulk, McGinn, Hamilton, McKegg, Foegele, Wallmark. The scoring from those guys stepping up has been the difference maker in us winning these games.
I just hope to Sweet Baby Jesus that we don't overpay him like Rask.Wallmark is a very interesting player for me. I wonder if he can really establish himself as a capable 3C in the 2nd half of this season.
I just hope to Sweet Baby Jesus that we don't overpay him like Rask.
I just hope to Sweet Baby Jesus that we don't overpay him like Rask.
I give Adam all the credit in the world on that particular signing, he didn’t HATE the player, he just said the long term was completely unnecessary given Rask’s youth and relative inexperience (and having one single worthy year of that contract). They could have ridden a couple of one or two year contracts and not had the 6 year albatross wrapped around his neck.Rask put up a 21-27-48 season the year before we extended him at $4mil per year.
If Wallmark did that this year, I’d have no problem extending him for that number.
To me the Rask situation is unfortunate, but not nearly as foreseeable as some remember. There was one guy (Adam Gold?) who trashed the signing at the time, saying it was overpayment for a “3rd line center”, and we all thought he was crazy. And even HE didn’t foresee the extent of Rask’s regression to “barely NHL caliber.”
To me, that signing is a prime example of right process, wrong result.
I give Adam all the credit in the world on that particular signing, he didn’t HATE the player, he just said the long term was completely unnecessary given Rask’s youth and relative inexperience (and having one single worthy year of that contract). They could have ridden a couple of one or two year contracts and not had the 6 year albatross wrapped around his neck.
I give Adam all the credit in the world on that particular signing, he didn’t HATE the player, he just said the long term was completely unnecessary given Rask’s youth and relative inexperience (and having one single worthy year of that contract). They could have ridden a couple of one or two year contracts and not had the 6 year albatross wrapped around his neck.
Don’t get me wrong, excellent call on his part. But it was indeed the result of a process that’s served us pretty well otherwise. No one is complaining about Slavin and Pesce’s contracts after using the same thought process.
And I think the thought process was that if Rask never improves, he’s still worth the $4 million. A major regression to this extent, at least in my view, was practically out of the question. Even if he regressed to 35-40 points the contract wouldn’t have been quite this albatross. It’s practically truly dead money at this point.