Yeah felt sorry for him he had to watch both empty netter going in .Freddy is a good hockey player. He wanted the hatty tonight.
All the angles I’ve seen Carlos stick is pulling the opposing players stick away from swayman .Challenge Initiated By: Boston
Type of Challenge: Goaltender Interference
Result: Call on the ice is upheld – Goal Detroit
Explanation: After video review, it was determined that the actions of Brandon Carlo contributed to Detroit’s Michael Rasmussen’s stick making contact with Jeremy Swayman’s glove outside the crease and therefore, did not constitute goaltender interference. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, that the goal should be allowed because “Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease…”
Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge
What a joke of a league... NHLOL!Challenge Initiated By: Boston
Type of Challenge: Goaltender Interference
Result: Call on the ice is upheld – Goal Detroit
Explanation: After video review, it was determined that the actions of Brandon Carlo contributed to Detroit’s Michael Rasmussen’s stick making contact with Jeremy Swayman’s glove outside the crease and therefore, did not constitute goaltender interference. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, that the goal should be allowed because “Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease…”
Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge
Just like the Cowboys game, they can always say whatever and cover their butt.Challenge Initiated By: Boston
Type of Challenge: Goaltender Interference
Result: Call on the ice is upheld – Goal Detroit
Explanation: After video review, it was determined that the actions of Brandon Carlo contributed to Detroit’s Michael Rasmussen’s stick making contact with Jeremy Swayman’s glove outside the crease and therefore, did not constitute goaltender interference. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, that the goal should be allowed because “Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease…”
Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge
Yet another disgraceful "job" done on the Bruins by NHL refs.Charron and McCauley did all they could.
Gutsy road win!!
Happy BirthDay!I only watched from the 11:05 mark of the second until the end of the second, when they played poorly, got screwed by the refs and were scored upon twice in an 8:55 stretch. I am superstitious, so I turned it off, and they played better and won. Draw your own conclusions. lol