Another win with a few very poor moments but a lot of positives to take away.
Even though the Yotes technically didn't score a PP goal, 2 of their goals came as penalty time expired and were the clear result of the PP. Factor in the two empty net goals against Colorado (5 on 4 and 6 on 5) and suddenly we're looking at 5 goals against in 9 man-advantage situations even though our official PK% is sitting at a tidy 85%. The PK needs to drastically improve. But other than that continued issue there was a ton to love last night.
I thought Tarasenko had a pretty good game. The shot doesn't look fully comfortable yet, but the release looks bettr than last game. If he can dial in the accuracy it will be a very dangerous shot again and he's always had spells of inaccuracy throughout his career. I'm more optimistic about the shot than I was toward the end of last year. I don't think he's ever going to an elite decision-maker with the puck when the shot isn't working, but he made better decisions with the puck than in game 1. While his assist was a secondary assist, he made a smart play with the puck which led to a quick shot that could have easily been buried. It wasn't, but the scramble after that shot led to a pass and goal. It was definitely an earned assist. I thought he was making good decisions on the PP and even though he didn't get any great looks on the PP he was participating in a unit that looks dangerous. If we get last night's version of Tarasenko every night without the shot accuracy coming back, I think we are looking at a guy who has 10-15 goals and 15-20 assists by the halfway point of the season. So long as one of those numbers is on the high end of that estimate, that should be good enough to facilitate a trade worth taking. He's getting very sheltered usage, but he is turning that usage into very strong possession/underlying metrics and showing that he's not a liability out there. Ideally, he finds the shot and turns into the old offensive stud. But even if he doesn't, he is a moveable piece (or a good contributor to this team) if last night's Tarasenko is what we get on a regular basis.
Kyrou looked special last night. Ignore the stats and he just looked like a line driver that needs to be specifically game planned for.
The competition for spots in the bottom 6 appears to be working. Neighbours and Kostin looked like they were playing for jobs last night and both made it incredibly difficult to remove them from the lineup. I'd love to see them force Neal into 'permanent healthy scratch' status, but I'm confident that Neal will be working like a pro in practice and trying to force his way back in when someone has an off night. I want to see a year-long competition for time in the bottom 6 and so far the kids aren't disappointing.
I thought the D pairings looked decent at 5 on 5. Krug-Faulk put up really good possession numbers and they were a +2 when they were on the ice together. Krug got exposed when he was partnered with anyone else, but the Krug-Faulk pair was very effective last night. They were the obvious 2nd pair for the 2nd straight game and were overwhelmingly successful in that role last night. I'm not sold that Scandella is good enough to play 22 minutes a night as a top pair partner to a non-elite 1D. I still think that Parayko's partner is our biggest hole, but he was fine last night. Walman/Bortz were completely fine as a 3rd pair. I'm not seeing anything to tell me that Walman can get his shot off quick enough to use it effectively in the NHL, but he defended at the NHL level last night. Our 3rd pair just needs to not be a liability and they succeeded in that role last night. Excluding the PK, I thought we defended well enough last night (considering what the offense looks like).
Saad-ROR-Perron were used in an extremely defensive role. They didn't start in the offensive zone a single time together and it looks like the plan was "they are going to shut down Arizona's only real threats and the depth is going to beat them on the scoreboard." Tough to argue with results because they played an incredibly low-event game (9 attempts against and only 2 scoring chances against).
Stupid play by Buch to get tossed, but I will never understand how the NHL views a headbutt with no injury as one of the dirtiest things you can do but views a crosscheck to the face/head as a simple minor penalty when there is no injury. He's probably going to get some supplemental discipline, but you are never going to convince me that his actions were the dirtiest part of that exchange.