HoliksGhost
Registered User
- Oct 24, 2007
- 2,808
- 2,065
Holtz didn’t get the memo ?
Holtz didn’t get the memo ?
Hahahaha get lost it’s insanely great value for bothThere better be salary retention at that price. Not a fan of trading Bahl AND a first
Let's wait for the conditions. Usually these details come out later.Pick should be top 10 protected or else it’s sort of a shit deal
If we're in the top 10 next year we're in deep troubleBetter be top 10 protected
If this team is picking in the top 10 next year then can just move the franchise at that pointPick should be top 10 protected or else it’s sort of a shit deal
Because nobody else wants this ****ing guy eitherI'm telling you guys Holtz has 9 lives on this team, every single time I think he's gone he stays
How is it insanely good value? Bahl is a young defender who could be decent and a first for a goalie entering his 35 year old season.Hahahaha get lost it’s insanely great value for both
Its still not 10OA and not GritsyukA young roster player that filled a very big need for this team and a first for an aging, mediocre, overpaid goalie. That's just terrible asset management, but I knew it would end up being a terrible deal for us.
Huge .. although if we are picking 10 or higher next year, we have much more major issues.
Whenever you have to include a players age it’s trying to pump them up and their value