Freidman: don't expect Campbell to be back Leafs inital offer was 2.75 million per year

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Freidman was on the fan today and it doesn't sound like Jack will be back Freidman said they were very far apart that the Leafs Inital offer was 3 years at around 2.75 million per year.

This report makes me so happy, low ball the shit out of Campbell because if he takes it then he's a backup making backup money

if you piss him off then you can go out and get a real #1 and hopefully a real backup to, because you can't bring him back he's to injury prone and when he did play he sucked, you need to trade him or LTIR him or something but you need to use that money elsewhere.

but Back to Campbell it doesn't sound like he's back and that's a good thing we need better than a 3.15 GAA and 897 save% come playoff time.

We need a guy that can close when he gets the chance, he had 3 cracks it against Montreal and 2 against Tampa and couldn't get it done.

I said it before I will say it again we need John Gibson you put John Gibson on this team and we aren't having these conversations we are talking about Florida.
Give me one good reason for anaheim to trade gibson? Except if he asking for a trade... there no good reason so just forgot it.

Amount goalie who will hit free agency, kuemper in the case he didnt resign in colorado.. its the only better goalie...

The reality is the leafs dont have a lot of option...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3blizzard4
If not Campbell, who is it? Any UFAs ? Any goalies we could legitimately trade for (not EA sports trade)?

Or is it Mrazek?
 
Give me one good reason for anaheim to trade gibson? Except if he asking for a trade... there no good reason so just forgot it.

Amount goalie who will hit free agency, kuemper in the case he didnt resign in colorado.. its the only better goalie...

The reality is the leafs dont have a lot of option...

he has stated in the past he wasn't interested in the past he's not interested in a rebuild and the Ducks are clearly in a rebuild after trading Rakell and Manson and Lindholm
 
Give me one good reason for anaheim to trade gibson? Except if he asking for a trade... there no good reason so just forgot it.

Amount goalie who will hit free agency, kuemper in the case he didnt resign in colorado.. its the only better goalie...

The reality is the leafs dont have a lot of option...

The rumour and thought for a while is that Gibson wants out. He wants to win. He has a 10 team NTC and an American wife so who knows
If he would come here.

But there are always goalie options.

If not Campbell, who is it? Any UFAs ? Any goalies we could legitimately trade for (not EA sports trade)?

Or is it Mrazek?

Gibson Blackwood or varly if trade

Husso. Comrie. Kuemper. Fleury. Are ufa.

Dreiger for mrazek is a likely possibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3blizzard4
The rumour and thought for a while is that Gibson wants out. He wants to win. He has a 10 team NTC and an American wife so who knows
If he would come here.

But there are always goalie options.



Gibson Blackwood or varly if trade

Husso. Comrie. Kuemper. Fleury. Are ufa.

Dreiger for mrazek is a likely possibility.

Gibson was telling he want to win like every player in the NHL. Never telling he want out of anaheim...

Fleury was worst of campbell all season long and will be at 38

Comrie in wich world comrie should be a better option?!?!

Husso didn't prove hes a better goalie and leafs will probably dont save anything in term of salary. Changing 4 25 cent for 1$

Blackwood is a long shot and have everything to prove.and had injury issues too...

Like i said there are not a lot of better option than campbell
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brown Dog
Gibson was telling he want to win like every player in the NHL. Never telling he want out of anaheim...

Fleury was worst of campbell all season long and will be at 38

Comrie in wich world comrie should be a better option?!?!

Husso didn't prove hes a better goalie and leafs will probably dont save anything in term of salary. Changing 4 25 cent for 1$

Blackwood is a long shot and have everything to prove.and had injury issues too...

Like i said there are not a lot of better option than campbell

Except there are lots of rumours he wants out of Anaheim once they said it was a rebuild

Friedman was just talking to Redmond saying Gibson and the leafs have mutual interest.

He did play junior here
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShaneFalco
Except there are lots of rumours he wants out of Anaheim once they said it was a rebuild

Friedman was just talking to Redmond saying Gibson and the leafs have mutual interest.

He did play junior here

Its sure if he want to go somewhere else to have a chance to win, leafs should be agressive on him no doubt about it. Hes 1 of 5 best goalie in the NHL but still a IF
 
In my opinion, for Campbell, with his small track record....4.5 mil should get it done all day long. Campbell trying to do us a solid would look something like 4mil per x 4 years. Hope a little extra commitment from our side gets it done. I'd even go as high as 5 years, as that still only brings Soupy to 35 when his contract ends, which is fine for a goalie. Mrazek needs shipped out of town as early as possible, but I'm sure management knows that
 
In my opinion, for Campbell, with his small track record....4.5 mil should get it done all day long. Campbell trying to do us a solid would look something like 4mil per x 4 years. Hope a little extra commitment from our side gets it done. I'd even go as high as 5 years, as that still only brings Soupy to 35 when his contract ends, which is fine for a goalie. Mrazek needs shipped out of town as early as possible, but I'm sure management knows that

I'd explore the market before I signed him. Rumour is he will and will circle back to the Leafs.

With Binnington playing well, I'd look at acquiring Husso or Binnington.

Halarious how the usual suspects said you can't trade Mrazek during the season. LOL, he wasn't capable of sitting on the bench in the playoffs and now Dubas is left holding the bag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShaneFalco
I'd explore the market before I signed him. Rumour is he will and will circle back to the Leafs.

With Binnington playing well, I'd look at acquiring Husso or Binnington.

Halarious how the usual suspects said you can't trade Mrazek during the season. LOL, he wasn't capable of sitting on the bench in the playoffs and now Dubas is left holding the bag.
Was that really a stance anyone took? Mrazek looked terrible. If anything, I imagine you couldn't get rid of him due to no demand for him.
 
Its sure if he want to go somewhere else to have a chance to win, leafs should be agressive on him no doubt about it. Hes 1 of 5 best goalie in the NHL but still a IF

The issue would be American wife and vivid restrictions. But if Friedman says he has interest I can’t see why this isn’t plan a b c.

If it wasn’t for matthews I would rather try husso/Comrie. But it’s too big to chance.

Although personally I see matthews looking at a short term 3 year deal. See where the cap goes. He will be the one that signs Just before when the cap is supposed to jump to 90 plus.

Would he base his cap on 85 million and lock in? Or would he take the 3 years. Break the leafs goal record and try again at 29 with a 100 million cap? I really don’t know. The

Cap is supposed to go to 90 the year after he becomes ufa….. do you just give him the 8 years on the 90 million projection? It’s fascinating

I didn't think there was a market for him but Jeff Marek claimed there was and the Leafs were not interested. Embarassing.



I think mrazek first and a good prospect (Robertson) for Gibson would make sense.

I think that’s why they are protecting the first and didn’t trade it
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToneDog
The issue would be American wife and vivid restrictions. But if Friedman says he has interest I can’t see why this isn’t plan a b c.

If it wasn’t for matthews I would rather try husso/Comrie. But it’s too big to chance.

Although personally I see matthews looking at a short term 3 year deal. See where the cap goes. He will be the one that signs Just before when the cap is supposed to jump to 90 plus.

Would he base his cap on 85 million and lock in? Or would he take the 3 years. Break the leafs goal record and try again at 29 with a 100 million cap? I really don’t know. The

Cap is supposed to go to 90 the year after he becomes ufa….. do you just give him the 8 years on the 90 million projection? It’s fascinating



I think mrazek first and a good prospect (Robertson) for Gibson would make sense.

I think that’s why they are protecting the first and didn’t trade it

Tough to give up our 1st again but that pretty much might be the cost to dump Mrazek (some will argue it won't cost a first) alone, so adding Robbie would be a no brainer.
 
Tough to give up our 1st again but that pretty much might be the cost to dump Mrazek (some will argue it won't cost a first) alone, so adding Robbie would be a no brainer.

I don’t personally see that it would cost a first. Mrazek is 2 x 3.8 not 5 x 5 he is only 30 and has had plenty of success. He wasn’t who I wanted last year but it’s not like he is an 8 year anchor.

A rebuilding. Team could absolutely use hun. I don’t expect much value. But I don’t think it’s a first.
 
If you want Gibson and for the Ducks to take Mrazek off your hands then it starts with a 1st+Knies+.
 
Not sure about Gibson. There's a poster on the Devils board who watches every goal against and assesses the goals allowed as either stoppable or unstoppable. He thinks Gibson is washed. Obviously just one guy's opinion, but he watches thousands of goals every season against every goalie.
 
The issue would be American wife and vivid restrictions. But if Friedman says he has interest I can’t see why this isn’t plan a b c.

If it wasn’t for matthews I would rather try husso/Comrie. But it’s too big to chance.

Although personally I see matthews looking at a short term 3 year deal. See where the cap goes. He will be the one that signs Just before when the cap is supposed to jump to 90 plus.

Would he base his cap on 85 million and lock in? Or would he take the 3 years. Break the leafs goal record and try again at 29 with a 100 million cap? I really don’t know. The

Cap is supposed to go to 90 the year after he becomes ufa….. do you just give him the 8 years on the 90 million projection? It’s fascinating



I think mrazek first and a good prospect (Robertson) for Gibson would make sense.

I think that’s why they are protecting the first and didn’t trade it
Matthews/marner next contrat dont think it will be about money but about winning. With maturity im pretty they will understand than more they take and less the team around him will be good..


Having interest doesn't mean he want necessairly want to leave... thats just telling hes interest to play in Toronto if duck are ready to trade him to toronto. Thats it...so still a if...

Comrie is a back up
Hussk are he better than Campbell? Refuse to give 4 m to campbell but giving 4 to husso who didnt prove anything more than campbell dont make sense at all...
 
Matthews/marner next contrat dont think it will be about money but about winning. With maturity im pretty they will understand than more they take and less the team around him will be good..


Having interest doesn't mean he want necessairly want to leave... thats just telling hes interest to play in Toronto if duck are ready to trade him to toronto. Thats it...so still a if...

Comrie is a back up
Hussk are he better than Campbell? Refuse to give 4 m to campbell but giving 4 to husso who didnt prove anything more than campbell dont make sense at all...

Campbell is probably looking at 5-6. He has a long history of injuries. If they could get him for 4 million I would be ok with it. But he can’t stay healthy. He has had what 5 injuries in the 2 years he has played here?

Husso is probably 3.5 x3 like dreiger. If Campbell were to take that.

Comrie is a 26 year old who could be the next Campbell. It’s a realistic bet
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToneDog
Campbell is probably looking at 5-6. He has a long history of injuries. If they could get him for 4 million I would be ok with it. But he can’t stay healthy. He has had what 5 injuries in the 2 years he has played here?

Husso is probably 3.5 x3 like dreiger. If Campbell were to take that.

Comrie is a 26 year old who could be the next Campbell. It’s a realistic bet

Do you want to base your entire season on a bet like Comrie with Mrazek and / or Kallgren at plan B?!?!?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buds17
Do you want to base your entire season on a bet like Comrie with Mrazek and / or Kallgren at plan B?!?!?!

No it wouldn’t be both. Comrie would be a tandem. I wouldn’t do Comrie holtby for example

But If you got husso it might make sense
 
No it wouldn’t be both. Comrie would be a tandem. I wouldn’t do Comrie holtby for example

But If you got husso it might make sense
Husso on free agency will win the same kind of money than campbell... so why changing someone everyone love in the locker room for a similar goalie at similar salary ...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad