GDT: Free agency madness, brought to you by the letter G - PART 2

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Makes me wonder if they trying to get someone well rounded to perhaps replace Chabot in 4 years time or something.
Would be weird to get any of these guys to replace Chabot in 4 years when he'll be 29 yo, in his prime, most of his salary paid off, still has 2 prime years left at a reasonable AAV (in 1-2 years the going rate for a top pairing D will be 10M+ as it alreayd basically is.

Werensky, Jones, McAvoy, Fox, Nurse, Josi, Hamilton, Makar all make >9M on 8 year contracts basically.

Pietrangelo, OEL, Burns, Trouba, Carlsson, Hedman, Ekblad all make >8M and the only reason they're not in that 10M range is eithe rbecause they signed 3-4 years ago when the cap was 79M, or they signed as 30+ year olds.

From a monetary perspective, it makes no sense to consider trading Chabot in 4 years as he'll still be in his prime and likely paid less than most top 1-2 D by then.

In 5 years if you don't see the possibility of extending him, then i coulud see us do a re-tool/rebuild for a haul.

All these names, Chychryn, Marino, Burns, Weegar, are also older or the same age as Chabot - so in 4 years, they'll need just as much replacement. Chychryn is the only that's a year younger, but again, his contract ends in 3 years, and he'll need a bigger contract than Chabot already has.

His bridge will cost 4-5M. I'm not talking about a long-term contract, which would be more reasonable.
I don't know if there's any data to back that up but from a points perspective alone, he'd have to score 35, closer to 40 points this (his rookie) season, whilst on the 3rd line with no hope on the PP, coming off a major injury with loss development, to command 4-5M let alone on a bridge.

He might get 4-5M on a 5-6 year term contract a la Batherson but still requires a hint of a 50 pt season. He projects to likely get a 2.5-3M bridge at this rate assuming he production is in that 30 pt +/- 5 pts range.
 
Last edited:
Gotta wonder if Kadri signing in Calgary opens up RHD trade options for us as the Flames would surely be over the cap with only 2.7m space right now.
Doubt it since they're trying real hard to compete and Tanev is out to start the season. That'll probably give them the cap room and then they can offload Monahan or pay big for someone to take Lucic
 
In the short term Kadri signing in the west improves ottawa's chances of making it into a wildcard spot. Not a huge change but I'll take even marginally easier conference match-ups wherever I can find them.
 
To Ottawa:
Lucic - 5.250 (1.000 in salary)
2023 2nd

To Calgary:
Scott Sabourin

Ottawa then sends that 2nd along with Zaitsev and other picks to land Chychrun.
It clears 5.250 for Calgary which should be enough to fit Kadri.
I like this idea. I feel like we can get a 2nd + 3rd for 5M of cap space on a team that's stuck over the cap, especially if Monahan comes back.

Really hinges on us being confident we can unload Zaitsev though, because that would mean we're clear for 2023-2024. We save 1M in real dollars to boot.

EDIT: well nevermind then *see below*
 
  • Like
Reactions: KevinRedkey
So, if it costs a 1st to move Monahan and his 6 mil, I'd figure it should cost a bit less for Zaitsev who is a least a decent option for a third pairing albeit overpaid in that role

I guess Z technically costs about the same but across two years, but he's more serviceable as a roster player imo.
 
Flames better win a cup soon because they are paying 17.5M to Huberdeau and Kadri until they are 38.

Happy Kadri didn't go to the Isles. Last thing we need is another team going all-in in the East.
I kind of assume they'll be rebuilding on the back half or third of both those contracts. With those the only two on the books currently that last that long, I think they'll be fine to manage them through a rebuild when you have so much less on the books.

With the team needing new momentum on that arena for their long term survival in Calgary, it seems a fragile time to tear it down and turn away fans for 5+ years like we just witnessed in Ottawa, so it's probably their best play to double down like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad