SpezDispenser
Registered User
- Aug 15, 2007
- 27,859
- 7,523
We can add Chychrun and not be in any trouble. We'd have to shed a contract or 2 in a couple of years, but I hope that isn't seen as the holdup. It's likely not, it's the asking price.
There was some good fortune involved in that EK deal and he carried a bigger rep, so expecting the same from a Chabot trade is probably not realistic. If you top that off with what it would cost to acquire Chychrun and him needing another big contract soon, how much ahead are you?Chychrun plus an EK type deal for Chabot which allows us to keep more players and extend our competitive window is more valuable than going all in on Chabot.
Also watching EK carry the Senators to the ECF game 7 was rather impressive for outsiders.There was some good fortune involved in that EK deal and he carried a bigger rep, so expecting the same from a Chabot trade is probably not realistic. If you top that off with what it would cost to acquire Chychrun and him needing another big contract soon, how much ahead are you?
I'm sure it did.Also watching EK carry the Senators to the ECF game 7 was rather impressive for outsiders.
Agent Zub doesn't like Tkachuk. That is about the extent of it.What is this..
HC Issue aside I hope the Sens are not entertaining trading Formenton,I assume the Sens are offering Formenton instead of Greig, and I'm sure a big reason for that is that Greig would probably be able to plug into the 3rd line LW role by potentially the end of next season for around 2M less than Formenton, resulting in around 6M in savings over his 3YR ELC. If the Yotes retained 50% on Chychrun the savings would be slightly higher (about 2.6M per year).
Depends on how much better the Sens think Greig will end up compared to Formenton. Personally I think both probably top out as 40-50P 2nd line LWs that bring value away from the puck with good two-way games, quality PKing and some physicality (bit more in Greig's case), so I wouldn't mind the above deal.
I’m not sure we do this board is talking about who to trade Chabot or tkatchuk lol. Not long ago we didn’t think we could sign themFixed that for you.
Agent Zub doesn't like Tkachuk. That is about the extent of it.
No, it’s an entertainment business. Brady is entertaining and he sells lots of tickets. Every team can’t win the cup each year. You have to sell the market something and Brady does that for the team in spades.It's crazy how well marketing works on people. This place is like a cult now.
Lol so Chabot gets floated to be traded but no one accuses them of being haters but if Brady gets floated (which makes so much more sense on so many levels) suddenly it's out of bounds and they are haters? Come on.
And it's not about liking the player or not. I like the player, I don't like the cap hit and the money allocated and it will increasingly be a problem. Because let's face it. Brady is the 5th or 6th best player when we're going to be competing and for some reason we're hoping he will carry the highest cap hit on the team.
Keeping Chabot and his better salary makes way more sense than Brady if we're forced to choose one.
It's crazy how well marketing works on people. This place is like a cult now.
I love both players but I'd keep Brady over Chabby...Lol so Chabot gets floated to be traded but no one accuses them of being haters but if Brady gets floated (which makes so much more sense on so many levels) suddenly it's out of bounds and they are haters? Come on.
And it's not about liking the player or not. I like the player, I don't like the cap hit and the money allocated and it will increasingly be a problem. Because let's face it. Brady is the 5th or 6th best player when we're going to be competing and for some reason we're hoping he will carry the highest cap hit on the team.
Keeping Chabot and his better salary makes way more sense than Brady if we're forced to choose one.
It's crazy how well marketing works on people. This place is like a cult now.
Aren't you a notorious Brady hater?Lol so Chabot gets floated to be traded but no one accuses them of being haters but if Brady gets floated (which makes so much more sense on so many levels) suddenly it's out of bounds and they are haters? Come on.
There was some good fortune involved in that EK deal and he carried a bigger rep, so expecting the same from a Chabot trade is probably not realistic. If you top that off with what it would cost to acquire Chychrun and him needing another big contract soon, how much ahead are you?
It would have been easy to simply state we shouldn't trade Chabot. You made the choice to include Tkachuk and make it a debate about which player we should keep.Lol so Chabot gets floated to be traded but no one accuses them of being haters but if Brady gets floated (which makes so much more sense on so many levels) suddenly it's out of bounds and they are haters? Come on.
And it's not about liking the player or not. I like the player, I don't like the cap hit and the money allocated and it will increasingly be a problem. Because let's face it. Brady is the 5th or 6th best player when we're going to be competing and for some reason we're hoping he will carry the highest cap hit on the team.
Keeping Chabot and his better salary makes way more sense than Brady if we're forced to choose one.
It's crazy how well marketing works on people. This place is like a cult now.
Lol so Chabot gets floated to be traded but no one accuses them of being haters but if Brady gets floated (which makes so much more sense on so many levels) suddenly it's out of bounds and they are haters? Come on.
And it's not about liking the player or not. I like the player, I don't like the cap hit and the money allocated and it will increasingly be a problem. Because let's face it. Brady is the 5th or 6th best player when we're going to be competing and for some reason we're hoping he will carry the highest cap hit on the team.
Keeping Chabot and his better salary makes way more sense than Brady if we're forced to choose one.
It's crazy how well marketing works on people. This place is like a cult now.
There's a pretty big differenceLol so Chabot gets floated to be traded but no one accuses them of being haters but if Brady gets floated (which makes so much more sense on so many levels) suddenly it's out of bounds and they are haters? Come on.
And it's not about liking the player or not. I like the player, I don't like the cap hit and the money allocated and it will increasingly be a problem. Because let's face it. Brady is the 5th or 6th best player when we're going to be competing and for some reason we're hoping he will carry the highest cap hit on the team.
Keeping Chabot and his better salary makes way more sense than Brady if we're forced to choose one.
It's crazy how well marketing works on people. This place is like a cult now.
I would like to see Chabot playing 23 to 25 minutes a night. He has been run ragged the last few years playing with a very weak defense group. He makes mistakes because he being overplayed.( because he had to be, someone had to be good back there). I would like to see him play with a bonafide number 2 defenseman, and a better overall group of defenseman. Also in the coming 2022-23 season he will have a nice group of forwards to make plays with for the first time in quite awhile. I would not be surprised if at the exit meetings at the end of this year he asked for the team to go out and get a top 4 defenseman. Apparently from what was being reported that he and Brady were quite vocal about improving the team in the off season. during the exit meetings.
I agree completely. 4 first rounders, rounding in to NHL form.Ice times will need to be cut significantly on defense from last year's deployment. Chabot's injury, player movement and changing ice times gave almost every D-man a lot more ice time.
LD - Chabot, Holden and Brannstrom averaged 58.5 mins per game in 2021.
LD - Chabot, Holden and Brannstrom averaged 66 mins per game in 2022.
There are only 60 mins to spread between them.
RD - Zub, Zaitsev and J.Brown averaged 55.5 mins per game in 2021.
RD - Zub, Zaitsev and Hamonic averaged 59 mins per game in 2022.
There are maybe 55-56 mins to spread between them, once the PP is factored out.
Players highlighted in Red had significant increases in ice time, or were replaced by a better player who plays a lot more in the case of J.Brown-Hamonic. Players highlighted in Blue had significant decreases in ice time.
FWIW, I would just leave things as they are and closely follow the internal growth of Sanderson, Brannstrom, Thomson and JBD.