Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals [MOD - Stay on Topic] 5

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,646
8,080
We are winning with the roster we have. Why would we want Saad coming in and disrupting that if he is expected to be no more than replacement level player to Perron? It's either a legitimate upgrade for the lineup or nothing, imo. Perron being on the shelf is working for us.

Also, not worth the additional cap next year.

The only way this makes sense is if Joel Hofer as a backup is the centrepiece. I don't know enough about Hofer to know if that's what you're suggesting but if he isn't better than Forsberg there is no sense downgrading there, even if Forsy is out for a few games.
Don't agree with this. There is a clear hole on Stuztle wing and on RD. If you can find a top 6 winger who can play with Stuztle it def fills a hole on the roster.

I personally don't think Perron is the answer he has lost a step and don't think you can have both him and G on the wing for Stuztle with his speed.

I am not sure if Saad is the answer but an upgrade is needed
 

ottawagm

Registered User
May 6, 2023
716
695
:blues
-Brandon Saad (4.5M x 2Y)
-Joel Hofer (775k x 1Y - Arbitration Eligible RFA)

:sens
-David Perron (4M x 2Y)
-Anton Forsberg (2.75M x 1Y - UFA)
-Mads Sogaard (775k x 2Y - Injured)

This trade assumes Forsberg isn't out long term because the Blues will need a backup goalie to replace Hofer. It also assumes David Perron isn't read to return for a while and would welcome the idea of getting traded back to his home state.

Why the Blues do it?
This trade would be more about gaining cap flexibility next year without hurting their roster this year. They move out a player who isn't working for one they are more familiar with in a change of scenery move. They shed 500k from the cap next year. Also, Hofer will be eligible for arbitration, so he will certainly make more than Sogaard's 775k salary. Sogaard clearly is on his way out in Ottawa, and might be an intriguing gamble given his ceiling. I doubt he has much trade value, but I also doubt that Hofer does either. The Blues get Forsberg as a stop-gap to back them up. When you consider that Saad makes an extra 1M in cap over the lifetime of this trade, it's very close to cap for cap (9.75M over 2 years from the Blues for 10.75M over 2 years for Ottawa). You could argue that Ottawa should have to retain a small amount on Forsberg.

Why Ottawa does it?
If Perron is not working out here and would welcome a trade back to St.Louis for family reasons, there is nothing to lose since his contract becomes a sunk cost. Is Saad going to come here and be a great player? Probably not. But due to the unfortunate situation with Perron, he's missed almost the entire season so far, and it might help Ottawa to get someone who is already in mid-season form and ready to go, even if it is Brandon Saad. Sogaard is clearly done and has very little trade value, so swapping him for Hofner is of minimal concern. It gets Ottawa an additional change of scenery in the backup goalie position, and if Sogaard puts it all together and meets his immense potential, he is out west.
Add in something around Zub + Greig for Parayko.
 

frightenedinmatenum2

Registered User
Sep 30, 2023
3,214
3,637
Orange County Prison
Add in something around Zub + Greig for Parayko.

I can't see Parayko coming here, but it wouldn't surprise me if we made the unpopular choice to move Zub out because of how injury prone he has been.

If Weegar is available, he might be a good target. Maybe he would waive to come home.

I don't expect anyone that satisfying in a Zub deal. I doubt he has a lot of trade value with his injury history.

On the topic of the actual proposal, Saad for Perron makes way too much sense if Saad actually wants out. I can't see STL getting much for him with his difficult it is to move out players with money and term who aren't performing. As a base, it makes a lot of sense as a legitimate change of scenery for everybody involved assuming Perron would be open to going back to what I assume is his home state now.
 

Alex1234

Registered User
Oct 14, 2014
16,880
7,046
We are winning with the roster we have. Why would we want Saad coming in and disrupting that if he is expected to be no more than replacement level player to Perron? It's either a legitimate upgrade for the lineup or nothing, imo. Perron being on the shelf is working for us.

Also, not worth the additional cap next year.

The only way this makes sense is if Joel Hofer as a backup is the centrepiece. I don't know enough about Hofer to know if that's what you're suggesting but if he isn't better than Forsberg there is no sense downgrading there, even if Forsy is out for a few games.
We are winning because of Linus rn let's be honest
Even if he can be a Vezina goalie any night, that .963 average for the last 5 games is not sustainable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Do Make Say Think

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,308
4,554
We are winning because of Linus rn let's be honest
Even if he can be a Vezina goalie any night, that .963 average for the last 5 games is not sustainable
Not entirely true.

He is playing amazing and is a big part of the success. We forget that goalies being good and helping teams win is allowed.

Overall the team is playing much better, though. If we can get more depth scoring then this team will be legit dangerous.

Pinto breoke through, if Greig, Ammadio, Sanderson, etc..can find a groove, that changes things dramatically.
 

PlayOn

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
2,397
3,204
Not entirely true.

He is playing amazing and is a big part of the success. We forget that goalies being good and helping teams win is allowed.

Overall the team is playing much better, though. If we can get more depth scoring then this team will be legit dangerous.

Pinto breoke through, if Greig, Ammadio, Sanderson, etc..can find a groove, that changes things dramatically.
It’s mainly Sanderson/the first pairing honestly.

Everything else has basically improved to at least adequate. But Sanderson generating nothing 5v5 is a hard thing to get past. I don’t see it changing with Hamonic as his partner either, so we basically just have to hope that Zub comes back strong.
 

frightenedinmatenum2

Registered User
Sep 30, 2023
3,214
3,637
Orange County Prison
No way Staios and Andlauer trade Perron going through the family issues he is. They want to have a human element to their reign; treat people right. No family issues they would make a deal if they felt it would make the team better

They would not do that, I agree. Nor, am I suggesting they should try to dump him somewhere. That would be cruel.

As far as I understand it, his relationship with St.Louis is like Karlsson's with the city of Ottawa.

The trade would be predicated on him feeling that taking a mulligan on the Ottawa signing and moving his family back to their home state would be beneficial.
 

PlayersLtd

Registered User
Mar 6, 2019
1,519
1,880
Don't agree with this. There is a clear hole on Stuztle wing and on RD. If you can find a top 6 winger who can play with Stuztle it def fills a hole on the roster.

I personally don't think Perron is the answer he has lost a step and don't think you can have both him and G on the wing for Stuztle with his speed.

I am not sure if Saad is the answer but an upgrade is needed
That's why I said either a legitimate upgrade to Perron or nothing. Saad is a lateral move.

The need is in the top 6, not a tweener.

We are winning because of Linus rn let's be honest
Even if he can be a Vezina goalie any night, that .963 average for the last 5 games is not sustainable
Not true. It isn't as flashy but one of the common denominators when this team was winning early in the season and now is how well the bottom 6 is playing.
 

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
22,044
2,745
Ottawa
If it's an in-season trade then it needs to be picking up a defenseman on the cheap who you think can slot into the top 4. Which basically sounds extremely difficult.

If this team can't make the playoffs then that's when you look at changes in the forward group.
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
67,590
53,502
They would not do that, I agree. Nor, am I suggesting they should try to dump him somewhere. That would be cruel.

As far as I understand it, his relationship with St.Louis is like Karlsson's with the city of Ottawa.

The trade would be predicated on him feeling that taking a mulligan on the Ottawa signing and moving his family back to their home state would be beneficial.
Sure but someone has to approach Perron with the concept of packing up and moving to St. Louis. I think they would steer away from it
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
45,026
17,927
We are winning because of Linus rn let's be honest
Even if he can be a Vezina goalie any night, that .963 average for the last 5 games is not sustainable
He had to be unreal last night.

The other games he had to be good. And that’s what you should expect from the goalie. And for 8 million you’re expecting great

Penguins needed Harry to have a big first half of the game yesterday and they got it.
 

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,629
3,668
Brampton
Perron for Saad would be an upgrade, but management can't move Perron unless Perron decides its the best thing for his family. Don't think management wants to damage their reputation like that
 

Cosmix

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 24, 2011
19,403
7,304
Ottawa
Don't agree with this. There is a clear hole on Stuztle wing and on RD. If you can find a top 6 winger who can play with Stuztle it def fills a hole on the roster.

I personally don't think Perron is the answer he has lost a step and don't think you can have both him and G on the wing for Stuztle with his speed.

I am not sure if Saad is the answer but an upgrade is needed
I agree that an upgrade is needed; however, we do not have the cap space to acquire a decent winger.

We would have to trade someone to create the cap space and I doubt anyone would want Perron at this stage of his career at the salary Staios agreed to pay him.

Sure but someone has to approach Perron with the concept of packing up and moving to St. Louis. I think they would steer away from it
It is something that some other teams would do to make their teams better. Examples: NYR and Vegas.
 

Cosmix

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 24, 2011
19,403
7,304
Ottawa
Perron for Saad would be an upgrade, but management can't move Perron unless Perron decides its the best thing for his family. Don't think management wants to damage their reputation like that
I think Perron has an annual 15 team no trade list; he is tradable!
 

Alex1234

Registered User
Oct 14, 2014
16,880
7,046
That's why I said either a legitimate upgrade to Perron or nothing. Saad is a lateral move.

The need is in the top 6, not a tweener.


Not true. It isn't as flashy but one of the common denominators when this team was winning early in the season and now is how well the bottom 6 is playing.
My bad
The bottom 6 is winning us some games with 4 goals on 21 in the last 7 games I forgot that lol
Let's see how we do when he gets back to .910 or it's Forsberg in the net then
 

Big Muddy

Registered User
Dec 15, 2019
9,170
4,447
We are winning because of Linus rn let's be honest
Even if he can be a Vezina goalie any night, that .963 average for the last 5 games is not sustainable
I get that Ullmark has been solid and the impact that has. But, not sure that is the sole reason for the wins. The team is playing better team D, more structure and more efficiency. We are providing more goal support as well lately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wondercarrot

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,629
3,668
Brampton
I think Perron has an annual 15 team no trade list; he is tradable!
Sorry, I meant to say the organization shouldn't trade him, not that they can't. They can be ruthless like Vegas or NYR, but not sure if its best to do that when we have trouble attracting FAs, unless of course the unlikely event of a deal being far too good to pass comes up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,629
3,668
Brampton
Would anyone take Burakovsky if the Kraken paid us something minor to take him?
Seattle has loads of wingers I'd love to have given their caphit and term. Burakovsky, Schwartz, or Bjorkstrand would be great for our middle 6. Not sure if they would need to pay to move either of those guys. Wouldn't say no to acquiring someone like Borgen who'd be an upgrade on Hamonic.

We aren't the most asset heavy, but wonder what we could offer in a trade.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad